Find or Sell Used Cars, Trucks, and SUVs in USA

2007 Chevrolet Trailblazer Ss Awd 6.0l 73750 Original Miles on 2040-cars

Year:2007 Mileage:73750
Location:

Round Lake, Illinois, United States

Round Lake, Illinois, United States
Advertising:

Up for auction is a 2007 Chevrolet Trailblazer 4 door SS All Wheel drive with only 73750 documented original miles and 20” aluminum wheels.

 With the SS package this Trailblazer is equipped with the powerful 6.0 liter 395 horse power engine complimented with the 4 speed automatic transmission.  Engine and transmission perform perfectly no issues, no strange noises and no leaks.

 

As far as appearance the body is very straight with only 1 ding on driver/passenger front doors, and a few scuffs on the rear bumper.  Also the body is very clean with no rust.  The interior is very clean with no rips or tears, all door panels, and dash have no cracks and are in perfect condition.  Overall the inside and outside of this Trailblazer is very clean and very nice.

 

This beautiful 2007 Chevrolet Trailblazer SS is loaded with all the standard accessories along with a host of options which includes AM-FM, 6 Disc CD, XM radio, driver/passenger power seat,  dual climate control, keyless entry, On Star, StabiliTrak .  All accessories and options work perfectly.

TECH SPECS

Powertrain
Engine V8, 6.0 Liter
Horsepower 395 @ 5400 RPM
Torque 400 @ 4400 RPM
Fuel Economy City 12/Hwy 16/Comb 14 MPG
Bore x Stroke 4.00 x 3.62
Compression Ratio 10.9
Fuel Type Gas
Fuel Induction Sequential Fuel Injection
Valve Train Overhead Valve
Valves Per Cylinder 2
Total Number Valves 16
Transmission Automatic
Drivetrain AWD
Transfer Case Torsen

Dimensions
Fuel Capacity 22.0 gallons
Wheel Base 113.0 inches
Overall Length 191.8 inches
Width with Mirrors 74.7 inches
Width without Mirrors -
Height 67.8 inches
Curb Weight 4663 lbs.
Tires / Wheel Size P255/50VR20
Rear Tires / Wheel Size -
Turning Radius -
Standard Axle Ratio 4.10
Minimum Ground Clearance 7.8 inches
Maximum Ground Clearance -
Maximum GVWR 6001 lbs.
Maximum Towing 6600 lbs.
Payload Base Capacity 1338 lbs.
Head Room: Front 40.2 inches
Head Room: Rear 39.6 inches
Leg Room: Front 46.9 inches
Leg Room: Rear 37.0 inches
Shoulder Room: Front 58.5 inches
Shoulder Room: Rear 58.5 inches
EPA Passenger -
EPA Trunk or Cargo 80.1 cu.ft. 


If you are the winning bidder, you are responsible for pickup or shipping costs and a $1,000.00 deposit within 48 hours of end of auction with full payment due in 7 business days.  Please contact me with any questions.

Auto Services in Illinois

Universal Transmission ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Parts & Supplies, Auto Transmission
Address: 1913 S Arlington Heights Rd, Elk-Grove-Village
Phone: (847) 228-1602

Todd`s & Mark`s Auto Repair ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Brake Repair, Tire Dealers
Address: Fidelity
Phone: (618) 233-9923

Tesla Motors ★★★★★

New Car Dealers, Electric Motors
Address: 1053 W Grand Ave, Mc-Cook
Phone: (866) 595-6470

Team Automotive Service Inc ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service
Address: 6021 W Roosevelt Rd, Park-Ridge
Phone: (708) 656-5300

Sterling Autobody Centers ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Body Repairing & Painting
Address: 816 East Roosevelt Rd, Bloomingdale
Phone: (630) 932-0943

Security Muffler & Brake Service ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Parts & Supplies, Mufflers & Exhaust Systems
Address: 362 Ruby St, Rockdale
Phone: (815) 723-0583

Auto blog

Diesel details: Comparing Ram 1500 EcoDiesel, Chevy Silverado Duramax, Ford F-150 Powerstroke

Thu, Jun 13 2019

With specifications for the 2019 Ford F-150 Power Stroke diesel already out, and the details on the 2020 Ram 1500 EcoDiesel and Chevy Silverado Duramax (and its GMC Sierra twin) trickling out, we felt it was a good time to start comparing the full-size trucks' light-duty diesels. Bear in mind, we've only driven one of these new diesel trucks, so we'll be sticking to numbers for now. Some numbers haven't been announced yet, either, but stay tuned, because we'll be updating this post with additional specifications as they become available. And if you want to compare any other versions of these trucks with other vehicles, be sure to check out our comparison tool. Now let's start comparing, starting with our big chart of numbers below. As we can plainly see, these trucks are quite closely matched. Each one has six cylinders, a displacement of 3.0 liters and a turbocharger to boost it. The output of each is somewhat close, too. The Ram 1500 EcoDiesel is the torque king at 480 pound-feet, 20 more than the GM trucks and 40 more than the Ford. The GM trucks win on power, though, with 277 ponies, 17 more than the Ram, and 27 more than the Ford. GM does report that you get their trucks' peak 460 pound-feet of torque from 1,500 rpm to 3,000 rpm, whereas the others only report peak torque at a particular point in the rev band, but all of these trucks should have wide, flat torque curves as you would expect from modern turbodiesels. 2020 Ram 1500 EcoDiesel View 8 Photos Engine output is only one part of the truck performance equation. We also have towing and payload capacity, as well as fuel economy. With towing, the Ram 1500 is the current leader with a maximum capacity of 12,560 pounds. That tops the Ford F-150's 11,400-pound tow rating by well over 1,000 pounds. The F-150 can carry 2,020 pounds in its bed, but we don't know yet whether that's better or worse than the Ram or the GM trucks. We also don't have numbers for the GM trucks' towing capacities. View 9 Photos As for fuel economy, the Ford F-150 manages a thoroughly impressive 22 mpg in the city and 30 on the highway with two-wheel drive. Choosing four-wheel drive drops those numbers to 20 and 25 respectively. The fuel economy numbers for the Ram, Chevy and GMC haven't been revealed yet, but for some comparison, we can look at the old Ram EcoDiesel. That truck's best fuel economy was 20 in the city and 27 on the highway with two-wheel drive.

GM recalling 15k midsize pickups over leaky brakes

Mon, Jun 8 2015

General Motors has announced a recall in coordination with the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration related to the brakes on the 2015 Chevy Colorado and GMC Canyon. In the 14,838 units in the United States estimated to be affected, the front brake calipers may be leaking fluid. Needless to say, that could make them less effective, which could hinder the vehicle's ability to stop in time to avoid a collision. The affected units were all manufactured between January 6 and December 24, 2014. The fix seems simple and straightforward enough, with dealers being instructed to inspect the front brake calipers, and replace them if necessary. See below for all the details from NHTSA. RECALL Subject : Brake Fluid Leak Report Receipt Date: MAY 12, 2015 NHTSA Campaign Number: 15V278000 Component(s): SERVICE BRAKES, HYDRAULIC Potential Number of Units Affected: 14,838 Manufacturer: General Motors LLC SUMMARY: General Motors LLC (GM) is recalling certain model year 2015 Chevrolet Colorado, and GMC Canyon trucks manufactured January 6, 2014, to December 24, 2014. The affected vehicles may experience the front brake calipers leaking brake fluid. This is due to air pockets, an imperfection in the metal caliper body. CONSEQUENCE: If the vehicle experiences a brake fluid leak it can increase the stopping distance, increasing the risk of a vehicle crash. REMEDY: GM will notify owners, and dealers will inspect and replace the front-brake calipers if necessary, free of charge. The recall is expected to begin July 10, 2015. Owners may contact GM customer service at 1-800-222-1020 (Chevrolet), or 1-800-462-8782 (GMC). GM's number for this recall is 14888. NOTES: Owners may also contact the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration Vehicle Safety Hotline at 1-888-327-4236 (TTY 1-800-424-9153), or go to www.safercar.gov. Related Video: Featured Gallery 2015 Chevrolet Colorado: First Drive View 38 Photos News Source: National Highway Traffic Safety AdministrationImage Credit: Copyright 2015 Seyth Miersma / AOL Recalls Chevrolet GMC Truck gmc canyon brakes

BMW, Hyundai score big in JD Power's first Tech Experience Index

Mon, Oct 10 2016

While automakers are quick to brag about winning a JD Power Initial Quality Study award, the reality, as we've pointed out before, is that these ratings are somewhat misleading, since IQS doesn't necessarily distinguish genuine quality issues. JD Power's new Tech Experience Index aims to solve that problem. The new metric takes the same 90-day approach as IQS but focuses exclusively on technology – collision protection, comfort and convenience, driving assistance, entertainment and connectivity, navigation, and smartphone mirroring. It splits the industry up into just seven segments, based loosely on size, which is why the Chevrolet Camaro is in the same division (mid-size) as Kia Sorento and the Mercedes-Benz GLE-Class is in the same segment as the Hyundai Genesis (mid-size premium). It makes for some screwy bedfellows, to be sure. Still, splitting tech experience away from initial quality should allow customers to make more informed and intelligent decisions when buying new vehicles. In the inaugural study, respondents listed BMW and Hyundai as the big winners, with two segment awards – the 2 Series for small premium and the 4 Series for compact premium, and the Genesis for mid-size premium and Tucson for small segment. The Chevrolet Camaro (midsize), Kia Forte (compact), and Nissan Maxima (large) scored individual wins. Ford also had a surprising hit with the Lincoln MKC, which ranked third in the compact premium segment behind the 4 Series and Lexus IS. This is a coup for the Blue Oval, whose woeful MyFord Touch systems made the brand a victim of the IQS' flaws in the early 2010s. But Ford and other automakers might not want to celebrate just yet. According to JD Power, there's still a lot of room for improvement – navigation systems were the lowest-rated piece of tech in the study. Instead, customers repeatedly saluted collision-avoidance and safety systems, giving the category the best marks of the study and listing blind-spot monitoring and backup cameras as two must-have features – 96 percent of respondents said they wanted those two systems in their next vehicle. But this isn't really a surprise. Implementation of safety systems from brand to brand is similar, and they don't require any input from users, unlike navigation and infotainment systems which are frustratingly deep.