Find or Sell Used Cars, Trucks, and SUVs in USA

Clean 2005 Chevrolet Ssr 6 Speed Manual on 2040-cars

Year:2005 Mileage:2814 Color: Red /
 Black
Location:

Twin Falls, Idaho, United States

Twin Falls, Idaho, United States
Advertising:
Transmission:Manual
Vehicle Title:Clear
For Sale By:Dealer
Engine:6.0L 364Cu. In. V8 GAS OHV Naturally Aspirated
Body Type:Convertible
Fuel Type:GAS
VIN: 1GCES14H05B120415 Year: 2005
Make: Chevrolet
Cab Type (For Trucks Only): Regular Cab
Model: SSR
Trim: Base Convertible 2-Door
Number of Doors: 2
Drive Type: RWD
Transmission Description: TRANSMISSION, 6-SPEED MANUAL, TREMEC
Mileage: 2,814
Drivetrain: Rear Wheel Drive
Sub Model: LS
Exterior Color: Red
Number of Cylinders: 8
Interior Color: Black
Condition: Used: A vehicle is considered used if it has been registered and issued a title. Used vehicles have had at least one previous owner. The condition of the exterior, interior and engine can vary depending on the vehicle's history. See the seller's listing for full details and description of any imperfections. ... 

Auto Services in Idaho

Zimmerman Auto Body ★★★★★

Automobile Body Repairing & Painting
Address: 1775 W Pine Ave, Kuna
Phone: (208) 888-7241

Westside Towing & Recovery ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Auto Engine Rebuilding, Towing
Address: Hauser
Phone: (208) 773-7722

Simple Auto Sales ★★★★★

Used Car Dealers
Address: 9458 W Fairview Ave Ste J, Kuna
Phone: (208) 258-8256

Hanigan Chevrolet ★★★★★

New Car Dealers, Used Car Dealers
Address: 915 S Main St, Fruitland
Phone: (888) 994-2166

Diamond Automotive Machine ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Machine Shop, Engine Rebuilding & Exchange
Address: 434 1/2 Main Ave S, Twin-Falls
Phone: (208) 733-5648

Corwin Ford Nampa ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, New Car Dealers, Used Car Dealers
Address: 5707 E Gate Blvd, Nampa
Phone: (855) 846-2966

Auto blog

GM faces possible class action lawsuit over 8-speed transmission

Thu, Apr 25 2019

General Motors has been hit with a class-action lawsuit from owners who allege the eight-speed automatic transmission found in several rear-wheel-drive Chevrolet, Cadillac and GMC models between the 2015 and 2019 model years has a defect that causes the vehicles to hesitate and jerk when accelerating or slowing down. The lawsuit was posted to ClassAction.org and spotted by GM Authority. Problems with GM's Hydra-Matic 8L90 and 8L45 transmissions have been well-documented on Internet forums and via complaints filed with the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, with many reporting damage to their vehicles. The lawsuit was first filed in December in U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida but appears to have been transferred recently to New York. Autoblog sought comment from Theodore Leopold, the lead attorney for the plaintiffs. "These transmissions have a common defect," the complaint reads. "Drivers attempting to accelerate or decelerate their cars feel a hesitation, followed by a significant shake, shudder, jerk, clunk, or 'hard shift' when the vehicle's automatic transmission changes gears." The problem also occurs when the vehicles accelerate in a single gear, without shifting, the plaintiffs allege. "Drivers have reported that the shift is sometimes so violent, they feel as though they have been hit by another vehicle." The problem is believed to center on the transmission, torque converter or both. The complaint says it causes undue friction, causing hydraulic systems and gears to function improperly and sometimes leaves metal shavings throughout the transmission, leading to costly repairs and replacement of parts or the entire transmission. It says GM has known about the problems since shortly after it introduced the transmissions, and has issued 13 technical service bulletins, none of which have resolved the problem. GM declined to comment on the lawsuit. The plaintiffs say GM should have warned consumers about the issues and covered repairs under each vehicle's three-year/36,000-mile bumper-to-bumper warranty. They're seeking statewide classes in at least six states: California, Florida, Illinois, New York, Oklahoma and Texas.

Chevy Bolt name just might get through US trademark office

Sat, May 30 2015

UPDATE: GM told AutoblogGreen on June 1 that, "Our Chevrolet Legal team has been working closely with the USPT on the Chevrolet Bolt trademark. As of last week, our legal staff received consent from Yamaha to use the Bolt name. According to our legal team, our USPT application is back to active status." Also, it appears that GM has further trademarked Bolt EV and Chevrolet Bolt EV. Chevy wants to sell a 200-mile electric vehicle for around $35,000 in a few years. The Detroit automaker wants to call that car the Bolt, not to be confused with the company's other plug-in, the Chevy Volt. Unless something changes, the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) is going to crush GM's Bolt-flavored dreams. The USPTO has suspended GM's trademark application. The USPTO said in its suspension that there was a "likelihood of confusion" with another Bolt trademark, No. 4429759, which applies to a Bolt trademark filed by Yamaha on August 09, 2012. That's well before GM's effort to trademark the Bolt name in 2014. GM's application will remain suspended, the USPTO said, "until the earlier-filed referenced application(s) is either registered or abandoned." Maybe GM will use this setback to respond to the many criticisms of the Bolt name we've heard since it was first announced. There is another page on the USPTO's website that says GM's Bolt application is still live, but we assume that just hasn't been updated yet. Related Video:

Dodge vs. Chevy tug-of-war taken to the extreme

Mon, 17 Dec 2012

They say "idle hands are the devil's playground," but said playgrounds grow to Disney-sized proportions when a pair of jacked-up trucks, two egos, a chain and an empty mall parking lot are involved. Proof of this is the video below, which shows a Cummins-powered Dodge Ram circa 2006 to 2008 chained tail-to-tail with what looks to be a gasoline-powered Chevrolet Silverado from the late 1990s or early 2000s.
We don't necessarily have to tell you who wins this battle, but we'll let you see for yourself the lengths the "winning" driver goes to prove his point. There's plenty of foul language in the video below, so beware that this might be Not Safe For Work, and not that we should have to tell you, but please, do not try this at home.