Find or Sell Used Cars, Trucks, and SUVs in USA

2002 Chevy S10,green Metallic,regular Cab,4cylinder,new Tires,reliable on 2040-cars

US $2,050.00
Year:2002 Mileage:68724
Location:

Staten Island, New York, United States

Staten Island, New York, United States
Advertising:

This 2002 Chevy s10 is smooth running and great on gas. I use this truck for work. Need to sell quickly. This attractive green s10 is very dependable and has a small tool box mounted in rear bed. I live in staten island, all shipping responsibilities will be on the buyer. Lastly, a deposit of $500 is needed on day before final sale and the remaining balance shall be due upon delivery of truck.

Call me at: 1-347-444-3321 or email me at:drowejr@si.rr.com
Donnie 



MUST SELL IMMEDIATELY

Auto Services in New York

Walton Service Ctr ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service
Address: 1634 State Route 54, Bluff-Point
Phone: (315) 536-6928

Vitali Auto Exchange ★★★★★

Used Car Dealers, Wholesale Used Car Dealers
Address: 236 Main St, Owego
Phone: (607) 797-7900

Vision Hyundai of Canandaigua ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, New Car Dealers, Used Car Dealers
Address: 2440 Rochester Rd Rte 332, Bloomfield
Phone: (585) 394-3800

Tony B`s Tire & Automotive Svc ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Tire Dealers, Brake Repair
Address: 684 Main St, Port-Crane
Phone: (607) 729-8670

Steve`s Complete Auto Repair ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service
Address: 425 E John St, Wyandanch
Phone: (631) 669-2189

Steve`s Auto & Truck Repair ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service
Address: 6060 Route 353, Otto
Phone: (716) 938-9130

Auto blog

'84 MotorWeek Cherokee, Bronco and Blazer comparison indulges your SUV nostalgia

Fri, Jan 16 2015

These days, truck-based, full-frame SUVs are somewhat of a rarity on the auto landscape due to the rapid rise in popularity of easier-driving, car-based crossovers. Although, without the gradually building popularity of these chunky, high-riding vehicles decades ago, it's unlikely that America's roads would be filled with so many CUVs today. In its latest dig into the archives, MotorWeek has found a 1984 comparison test of a trio of these early Sport Utility Wagons, as long-time host John Davis called them, that helped get acceptance of this segment going. This is a red, white and blue test of the SUVs from American automakers at the time and pits the Chevrolet Blazer, Ford Bronco and Jeep Cherokee (specifically in Wagoneer guise) against each other. Driving manners and interior usability are considered in the evaluation, but Motorweek actually takes these vehicles off road, too. Among the bigger revelations is the improvement in on-road ability in the past 30 years. While specific 0-60 times aren't given, all three models take around 10 seconds just to get to around 50 miles per hour in the 500-feet on-ramp acceleration test. Check out this clip to see just how far this segment has progressed in the past three decades or just get a blast of nostalgia from these now vintage models. News Source: MotorWeek via YouTube Chevrolet Ford Jeep SUV Off-Road Vehicles Classics Videos Ford Bronco chevy blazer

GM claims it's first to sell million 30+ mpg vehicles

Fri, 04 Jan 2013

As we continue to put together all the data for the year-end edition of By The Numbers, General Motors has announced that it sold more than a million vehicles in the US last year that achieved at least 30 miles per gallon on the highway. More impressively, GM managed this feat using multiple strategies including small vehicle size, turbocharged engines and hybrid or plug-in technologies across four brands (Buick, Cadillac, Chevrolet and GMC) accounting for 13 separate models. This number will grow even more in 2013 thanks to cars like the all-electric Spark, the diesel Cruze, the range-extended Cadillac ELR and the Buick Encore compact CUV.
GM's small car sales were up 39 percent last year helping to attain this million-sales mark for 30-mpg models, and almost 40 percent of all GM sales consisted of cars with fuel-efficient I4 engines. In regards to more advanced means of improving fuel economy, GM says that it plans on having 500,000 vehicles with "some form of electrification" on the road by 2017.
Scroll down for the full list of GM's million 30+ mpg cars as well as an informative press release.

Poor headlights cause 40 cars to miss IIHS Top Safety Pick rating

Mon, Aug 6 2018

Over the past few months, we've noticed a number of cars and SUVs that have come incredibly close to earning one of the IIHS's highest accolades, the Top Safety Pick rating. They have great crash test scores and solid automatic emergency braking and forward collision warning systems. What trips them up is headlights. That got us wondering, how many vehicles are there that are coming up short because they don't have headlights that meet the organization's criteria for an "Acceptable" or "Good" rating. This is a revision made after 2017, a year in which headlights weren't factored in for this specific award. This is also why why some vehicles, such as the Ford F-150, might have had the award last year, but have lost it for this year. We reached out to someone at IIHS to find out. He responded with the following car models. Depending on how you count, a whopping 40 models crash well enough to receive the rating, but don't get it because their headlights are either "Poor" or "Marginal." We say depending on how you count because the IIHS actual counts truck body styles differently, and the Infiniti Q70 is a special case. Apparently the version of the Q70 that has good headlights doesn't have adequate forward collision prevention technology. And the one that has good forward collision tech doesn't have good enough headlights. We've provided the entire list of vehicles below in alphabetical order. Interestingly, it seems the Volkswagen Group is having the most difficulty providing good headlights with its otherwise safe cars. It had the most models on the list at 9 split between Audi and Volkswagen. GM is next in line with 7 models. It is worth noting again that though these vehicles have subpar headlights and don't quite earn Top Safety Pick awards, that doesn't mean they're unsafe. They all score well enough in crash testing and forward collision prevention that they would get the coveted award if the lights were better.