Find or Sell Used Cars, Trucks, and SUVs in USA

1964 Impala - Restoration Parts And Spares on 2040-cars

US $3,800.00
Year:1964 Mileage:666666 Color: trim parts
Location:

Tucson, Arizona, United States

Tucson, Arizona, United States
Advertising:

1964 Impala two door hardtop, factory AC car with fantasy top. If you're into 64s and have a use for a cache of extra trim and spares, this is for you. Acquired about half way through restoration from a local who had been gathering bits and pieces for years. No motor or trans, but looks like an otherwise complete car and the best trim parts from two other hardtops and an Impala SS. Duplicates of many pieces, and triplicates of some. Many brand new interior and exterior trim parts, emblems, and clips from Ecklers and Classic are stored in boxes. Front clip is super straight and clean. Inner fender wells included (with one extra well - see images) but not installed. X-Frame is solid, straight and rustless. Original transmission cross member and V8 engine mount frame towers are in the car, as is a good radiator. Comes with new body bushings (still in box) and new weatherstrip from Soft Seal, including windshield and rear glass seals, trunk seal, fuzzies, and door weatherstrip. Includes many spare body parts (not everything is shown in the images, believe it or not), including a extra complete rear bumper, spare grille, two core supports, both right and left doors,  rear window, spare right and left quarter glass, and spare instrument cluster. Also includes a complete original very clean right side rear quarter panel, which I think was intended to replace the one on the car that is a bit wavy. There are also random parts from the driveline, such as pulleys, in the mix. Brake hardware looked like it had been recently gone through when we pulled a front drum, and master cylinder appears newly installed (needs line to frame block installed) The body is a west coast survivor with minimal rust. Fenders are perfect. There is a patch panel installed on right front floor. One problem area I found is on the "ledge" below the left tail light where it meets the rear bumper. A straight, rustless patch panel from a donor car is in the pile of spares. Bottom pan in trunk has no obvious rust through but looks thin. Rockers and cowl are solid. There is a spare floor section with floor braces for the area behind the seat, but what's on the car looks OK. The only parts I know are missing for sure are the left front bumper section and the hood hinges (although, oddly, the hood hinge springs are there). Asking $3800 for all. Posted on Craigs locally and will end auction for first reasonable offer. Clear and open AZ title. I AM NOT SELLING PARTS AT THIS TIME. Please call, text or e-mail questions. 520-250-7027.

    Auto Services in Arizona

    Xtreme Roadside ★★★★★

    Auto Repair & Service, Locks & Locksmiths, Keys
    Address: 9424 W Jamestown Rd, Cashion
    Phone: (623) 680-6941

    Xpress Automotive & Wash ★★★★★

    Auto Repair & Service
    Address: 1436 N Higley Rd, Apache-Jct
    Phone: (480) 924-5224

    Windshield Replacement & Auto Glass Repair Phoenix ★★★★★

    Auto Repair & Service, Windshield Repair, Glass-Auto, Plate, Window, Etc
    Address: 1121 N 44th Street, Paradise-Valley
    Phone: (602) 235-0353

    West Glenn Body Shop ★★★★★

    Automobile Body Repairing & Painting
    Address: 5218 W Glenn Dr, Glendale-Luke-Afb
    Phone: (623) 931-4100

    Valley Express Auto Repair ★★★★★

    Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Inspection Stations & Services, Automobile Repairing & Service-Equipment & Supplies
    Address: 629 W Broadway Rd, El-Mirage
    Phone: (480) 630-1279

    Valley Express Auto Repair ★★★★★

    Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Inspection Stations & Services, Automobile Repairing & Service-Equipment & Supplies
    Address: 629 W Broadway Rd, Scottsdale
    Phone: (480) 630-1279

    Auto blog

    BMW, Hyundai score big in JD Power's first Tech Experience Index

    Mon, Oct 10 2016

    While automakers are quick to brag about winning a JD Power Initial Quality Study award, the reality, as we've pointed out before, is that these ratings are somewhat misleading, since IQS doesn't necessarily distinguish genuine quality issues. JD Power's new Tech Experience Index aims to solve that problem. The new metric takes the same 90-day approach as IQS but focuses exclusively on technology – collision protection, comfort and convenience, driving assistance, entertainment and connectivity, navigation, and smartphone mirroring. It splits the industry up into just seven segments, based loosely on size, which is why the Chevrolet Camaro is in the same division (mid-size) as Kia Sorento and the Mercedes-Benz GLE-Class is in the same segment as the Hyundai Genesis (mid-size premium). It makes for some screwy bedfellows, to be sure. Still, splitting tech experience away from initial quality should allow customers to make more informed and intelligent decisions when buying new vehicles. In the inaugural study, respondents listed BMW and Hyundai as the big winners, with two segment awards – the 2 Series for small premium and the 4 Series for compact premium, and the Genesis for mid-size premium and Tucson for small segment. The Chevrolet Camaro (midsize), Kia Forte (compact), and Nissan Maxima (large) scored individual wins. Ford also had a surprising hit with the Lincoln MKC, which ranked third in the compact premium segment behind the 4 Series and Lexus IS. This is a coup for the Blue Oval, whose woeful MyFord Touch systems made the brand a victim of the IQS' flaws in the early 2010s. But Ford and other automakers might not want to celebrate just yet. According to JD Power, there's still a lot of room for improvement – navigation systems were the lowest-rated piece of tech in the study. Instead, customers repeatedly saluted collision-avoidance and safety systems, giving the category the best marks of the study and listing blind-spot monitoring and backup cameras as two must-have features – 96 percent of respondents said they wanted those two systems in their next vehicle. But this isn't really a surprise. Implementation of safety systems from brand to brand is similar, and they don't require any input from users, unlike navigation and infotainment systems which are frustratingly deep.

    2014 Chevrolet Malibu gets more torque, more room and inspiration from the Impala

    Fri, 31 May 2013

    The 2014 Chevrolet Malibu, having stared at the Impala across the showroom floor for a year, gets nips and tucks all over inspired by its larger brother. The 2.5-liter four-cylinder in the base car will get a stop-start system and 23 city miles per gallon, 35 highway, each number representing a one-mpg improvement over the 2013 car. Output is 196 horsepower and 186 pound-feet of torque.
    Opt for the 2.0-liter turbo and, while power holds steady at 259 hp, torque goes up by 14 percent to a striking 295 lb-ft (a figure Chevy calls best in the class). The final details include newly programmed transmission shift points and faster shifts, for better engaging and enjoying the added power.
    Looks-wise, the grille's been reshaped to be more in line with the new Chevrolet look, a narrower upper grille hovering over a larger lower grille.

    Chevy says not to look at the 2019 Silverado's fuel economy rating

    Tue, Nov 20 2018

    The 2019 Chevy Silverado is hitting dealerships soon, and one of the most notable changes for the new full-size pickup is the addition of a 2.7-liter turbocharged inline-four. The engine replaces the naturally-aspirated 4.3-liter V6 in volume consumer models like the Silverado LT and promises more power, less weight and — most importantly — better fuel economy. The thing is, the gains in efficiency haven't been as dramatic as some might have hoped, especially when stacked up against competitors from Ford and Ram. As Automotive News reports, GM's response is a little murky. First, let's talk numbers. We're pulling all figures from FuelEconomy.gov, the official U.S. government source for fuel ratings. Fuel economy numbers on trucks vary greatly based on a number of factors. Bed and cab configuration play a part, but so does a four-wheel-drive system. You also have to factor in tires, transmissions, rear-axle gearing, hybrid systems and cylinder deactivation. Things like that can make the difference between best- and worst-in-class. The EPA's website doesn't give enough information a lot of the time, so there's really no easy way to compare apples-to-apples. First, take a look at the ratings for the 2019 Silverado. A 2.7-liter model with two-wheel drive is rated 20 city, 23 highway and 21 combined. That's both better and worse than a two-wheel drive 2018 Silverado with the 4.3-liter V6 (18 city, 24 highway and 20 combined). The updated 2019 Silverado with a 4.3-liter V6 has yet to be rated. With less weight and a smaller engine, many hoped Chevy would make bigger gains. It's unusual to see any decrease in a fuel economy metric these days. GM says that it's not done tuning the new 2.7-liter engine, so fuel economy could theoretically increase. Expanding further, a V8-powered 2019 Silverado (17 city, 24 highway and 19 combined) actually gets better highway fuel economy than a turbocharged four-cylinder powered truck in certain configurations, even if the latter has a better overall average. But that's only with two-wheel drive, the 8-speed transmission and cylinder deactivation. A Silverado with the 5.3-liter V8 and a 6-speed automatic is rated at 15 city, 22 highway and 17 combined. The biggest issue with the Silverado 2.7-liter doesn't come from within GM itself but from Ford and Ram. GM cites the Ford F-150 with the 3.3-liter V6 and the Ram 1500 with the 3.6-liter V6 as the closest competitors to its new 2.7-liter inline-four.