No Reserve 2000 Mercury Cougar 1 Owner No Accidents Newer Tires on 2040-cars
Hampton, New Jersey, United States
Engine:2.5L 2450CC 155Cu. In. V6 GAS DOHC Naturally Aspirated
For Sale By:Dealer
Body Type:Coupe
Fuel Type:GAS
Transmission:Automatic
Year: 2000
Warranty: Vehicle does NOT have an existing warranty
Make: Mercury
Model: Cougar
Options: Cassette Player
Trim: V6 Coupe 2-Door
Safety Features: Anti-Lock Brakes
Power Options: Power Locks
Drive Type: FWD
Mileage: 114,085
Number of Doors: 2
Sub Model: 3dr Cpe V6
Exterior Color: Black
Number of Cylinders: 6
Interior Color: Gray
Mercury Cougar for Sale
- 1997 mercury cougar xr-7 automatic 8 cylinder no reserve
- 1978 mercury cougar xr-7 hardtop 2-door 6.6l
- As good as it gets sweet 1969 mercury cougar xr7 convertible 351 v-8 p.s,p.b wow
- **very rare**1972 cougar xr7 convertible q-code 351 cobra jet 4-speed 1-owner!(US $15,997.00)
- 1970 mercury cougar xr-7 5.0l
- 1967 mercury cougar g t 390(US $16,500.00)
Auto Services in New Jersey
Yellow Bird Auto Diagnostic ★★★★★
White Horse Auto Pke ★★★★★
Vulcan Motor Club ★★★★★
Ultimate Drive Auto Repair ★★★★★
Sparx Auto ★★★★★
Same Old Brand ★★★★★
Auto blog
Translogic drives wood-burning Mercury Beaver XR-7
Sun, 31 Jul 2011You read the title right, we're talking about the Mercury Beaver XR-7. No, Mercury never officially built a car called the beaver. This is the brainchild of upstate New Yorker Chip Beam, who owns and operates Beaver Energy, LLC. It runs on gases created by wood pellets fermented in a 2,400-degree furnace and fed to a supercharged Ford 4.6-liter V8.
By all accounts, it gets down the road just fine, and has pretty close to full power. The best part is, you can grow the fuel yourself and avoid patronizing big oil, if that's your thing. The only drawback that we can see to the Mercury Beaver XR-7 is the PVC pipe jungle occupying the space that would be the trunk under normal circumstances.
Still, if you're willing to smell like a mountain man and look like a bad Back to the Future knockoff, this ride is right up your alley. Click past the jump to see Translogic's take on this modified Merc.
Preposed class-action lawsuit targets 'defective' MyFord Touch
Tue, 16 Jul 2013A national law firm, Hagens Berman Sobol Shapiro LLP, has filed a proposed class action lawsuit whose presupposition is that MyFord Touch is defective. Specifically, the complaint states that the system - as well as the MyLincoln Touch and MyMercury Touch clones - often freeze, fail to respond to voice or touch commands and have issues connecting to mobile phones.
According to Hagens Berman managing partner Steve Berman, MyFord Touch is a theoretically "brilliant idea" that falls short in actual execution. Said Berman in a press release, "In reality, the system is fundamentally flawed, failing to reliably provide functionality, amounting to an inconvenience at best, and a serious safety issue at worst."
Other MFT issues enumerated within the 41-page filing include problems controlling the window defroster, rear-view camera and navigation system. The suit maintains that Ford is aware of the problem but has yet to submit a workable and acceptable solution to MFT customers. Scroll down if you'd like to read the full press release.
NHTSA upgrades Ford floor mat unintended acceleration probe
Mon, 17 Dec 2012According to a Bloomberg report, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration has upgraded an investigation into complaints of unintended acceleration lodged against Ford vehicles. The investigation began in June of 2010 when just three complaints had been received and it only concerned the Ford Fusion and Mercury Milan, but this was at a time when the phrase "unintended acceleration" made grown men go pale. With 49 additional complaints received since then, the investigation has been reclassified as an engineering analysis - the last phase before a recall - and it has been expanded to include the Lincoln MKZ, making for a total of "around 480,000" units affected between the three sedans from the 2008 to 2010 model years.
The ostensible cause is that floor mats are trapping the accelerator pedal, but according to a Ford statement at the time, the entrapment is due to owners placing the optional all-weather floor mats, or aftermarket floor mats, on top of the car's standard floor mats. NHTSA has backed up that assessment, pinning the blame on "unsecured or double stacked floor mats."
On the face of it, it would appear that NHTSA has upgraded the status not because of Ford's error, but owner error, and Ford has stated publicly that it is "disappointed" in NHTSA's move. On top of NHTSA still being skittish after that other unintended acceleration debacle, it could be seen to be taking its time investigating all of the variables: it's reported that Ford changed its accelerator pedal design in 2010, a "heel blocker" in the floorpan has been considered a potential culprit in how the floor mats could be trapping the pedal, some drivers have said the floor mats weren't anywhere near the pedal, and according to a report in the LA Times, in "a letter sent by Ford to NHTSA in August 2010, the automaker said it found three injuries and one fatality that 'may have resulted from the alleged defect.'"
2040Cars.com © 2012-2024. All Rights Reserved.
Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.
Use of this Web site constitutes acceptance of the 2040Cars User Agreement and Privacy Policy.
0.024 s, 7231 u