Condition: Runs like a dream, cold air. The only issue is that the Catalytic Converter needs to be replaced. I recently put all new brakes in.
History: Report says I am the 5th owner, we bought it at around 90,000 miles for about $4500 to $5000, can't remember the exact price. I'll also say whatever loans or liens were due with this car are long gone. This car was bought and paid for with cash.
Sale will need to be local, unless someone wants to pay to have it brought to them, I'm open to ideas.
Ford Taurus for Sale
Auto Services in Florida
Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Parts & Supplies, Brake Repair
Address: 10320 N Dale Mabry Hwy, Palma-Ceia
Phone: (813) 269-7646
Auto Repair & Service
Address: 301 Marlborough St, Crystal-Beach
Phone: (813) 818-0993
Auto Repair & Service
Address: 2180 SW 38th St, Carol-City
Phone: (954) 316-6444
Auto Repair & Service, Auto Transmission, Transmissions-Other
Phone: (407) 331-9819
Automobile Parts & Supplies, Automobile Accessories
Address: 5650 NW 79th Ave, Ojus
Phone: (305) 593-9430
Auto Repair & Service, Auto Transmission, Auto Oil & Lube
Address: 474357 E State Road 200, Cecil-Field
Phone: (904) 261-6323
Tue, 28 Oct 2014 14:31:00 EST
Consumer Reports has released its Annual Auto Reliability Survey and the results are, in a word, interesting. While we already covered the score-damaging effects of infotainment systems, there's another big angle to the data that's getting some attention - the utterly dismal scores of the Detroit Three's small car offerings.
Wed, 16 Apr 2014 19:00:00 EST
The turbocharged Dodge Dart and Chevrolet Cruze, as well as the Ford Fiesta were their respective brands' lowest-scoring models, a stat that's made worse by the fact that the American automakers finished 25th, 21st and 23rd, respectively.
That's not acceptable for The Detroit Free Press' auto critic, Mark Phelan, who has penned a scathing critique of the D3's small car reliability scores, arguing that GM, Ford and Chrysler are "out of excuses."
The styling changes to the 2015 Ford Focus were shown off at the recent Geneva Motor Show, so what the EV version looks like is not that much of a surprise. Still, the 2015 Focus Electric is making its world debut here at the New York Auto Show, so we wanted to know what changes we are looking at compared to both the internal combustion engine version and the earlier EV models.
Mon, 17 Dec 2012 15:30:00 EST
The exterior visual distinctions between the ICE and EV are minimal, and basically nonexistent from the A-pillar to the rear. Up front, you can see the charge port, of course, but the front fascia has also undergone a bit of an adjustment. The front doesn't have the ICE version's flattened grille and the EV's Ford logo creates a bump in the hood line where none exists on the ICE. The 2015's grille is also different than the one on the 2014 Focus Electric, being slightly smaller (you can see this better if you compare pictures in our new gallery above to these of the 2011 Focus Electric and these of the gas-powered 2015 Focus).
The updated 2015 interior - which we couldn't access ourselves - has things like a new center stack, improved cupholders and is basically identical between the gas and electric models. With the car off, you can't even tell if you're in an EV or ICE, Seema Bardwaj, the US brand manager for the Focus, told AutoblogGreen. The only things that are different, she said, are extra menu screens to show EV powertrain information to the driver.
In all of the most hotly contested mainstream segments of the motoring universe, the difference of one mile per gallon averaged on a widow sticker can mean the difference between a sale and a walk-off - to say nothing of two or three mpg. So, when Hyundai and Kia were forced to reveal that many of their 40-mpg ratings were actually 38s and 37s, well, it made for big news.
It also, conceivably, made for a competitive disadvantage immediately, when the Korean automakers' products were being shopped versus the guys down the block. And it's that disadvantage that makes a recent story from Automotive News so juicy.
AN is reporting that Margo Oge, former head of the Environmental Protection Agency's Office of Transportation and Air Quality, got a tip in 2010 that Hyundai/Kia were "cheating" to get its impressive fuel economy numbers. The tip, said Oge (who retired from the EPA this past September), came from a senior vice president from a domestic automaker. The source was credible enough for Oge to launch an audit of the Hyundai figures, which ultimately lead to the debacle that we reported on a few months ago, and that the Korean company has been trying to bounce back from ever since.