4.2l 4 Speakers Am/fm Stereo Cd Player Power Windows We Finance & Take Trade-ins on 2040-cars
Delavan, Wisconsin, United States
Vehicle Title:Clear
Engine:4.2L 256Cu. In. V6 GAS OHV Naturally Aspirated
For Sale By:Dealer
Body Type:Mini Passenger Van
Fuel Type:GAS
Make: Ford
Warranty: Unspecified
Model: Freestar
Trim: SEL Mini Passenger Van 4-Door
Options: CD Player
Power Options: Power Windows
Drive Type: FWD
Mileage: 118,559
Vehicle Inspection: Inspected (include details in your description)
Sub Model: SEL
Exterior Color: Green
Number of Cylinders: 6
Interior Color: Other
Ford Freestar for Sale
- 2006 ford freestar cargo van 1-owner with 73,000 miles
- Ford freestar van with mobility cart/scooter friendly loading platform - look !!
- 2004 ford freestar 64000 orig miles se mini passenger van 4-door 3.9l(US $6,125.00)
- 2005 ford freestar sel mini passenger van 4-door 4.2l(US $6,200.00)
- 06 freestar se,88k,florida van,no rust,navigation,7 passengers,drives like new!!(US $6,000.00)
- 2004 ford freestar se, good condition, ac,cd,rear dvd entertainment system,
Auto Services in Wisconsin
Wendt`s Auto Body ★★★★★
VIP Auto Sales ★★★★★
Stags Repair ★★★★★
South St Paul Automotive ★★★★★
Silver Spring Collision Center ★★★★★
Showroom Auto Detailing ★★★★★
Auto blog
Consumer Reports criticizes small turbo engines for misleading performance, fuel economy claims [w/video]
Tue, 05 Feb 2013Consumer Reports has taken aim at at small-displacement, forced-induction engines, saying the powerplants don't manage to deliver on automaker fuel economy claims. Manufacturers have long held that smaller, turbocharged engines pack all power of their larger displacement cousins with significantly better fuel economy, but the research organization says that despite scoring high EPA economy numbers, the engines are no better than conventional drivetrains in both categories. Jake Fisher, director of automotive testing for Consumer Reports, says the forced induction options "are often slower and less fuel efficient than larger four and six-cylinder engines."
Specifically, CR calls out the new Ford Fusion equipped with the automaker's Ecoboost 1.6-liter four-cylinder engine. The institute's researchers found the engine, which is a $795 option over the base 2.5-liter four-cylinder, fails to match competitors in acceleration and served up 25 miles per gallon in testing, putting the sedan dead last among other midsize options.
The Chevrolet Cruze, Hyundai Sonata Turbo and Ford Escape 2.0T all got dinged for the same troubles, though Consumer Reports has found the turbo 2.0-liter four-cylinder in the BMW 328i does deliver on its promises. You can check out the full press release below. You can also read the full study on the Consumer Reports site, or scroll down for a short video recap.
2015 Ford Mustang Convertible to recreate Empire State Building stunt
Tue, 25 Mar 2014It would have been all too easy to miss the auto show debut of the 2015 Ford Mustang convertible. It was, after all, unveiled alongside its fixed-roof counterpart at the Detroit Auto Show this past January, lumping coupe and cabrio into one debut. But Ford is evidently still intent on making its new droptop stand out. The top of the Empire State Building ought to do the trick.
Automotive history buffs may recall that, 50 years ago, Ford unveiled its first Mustang convertible atop what was then the tallest building in the world, that Art Deco icon of the New York skyline. Half a century later, Ford is recreating the feat and bringing the new topless Mustang to the same observation deck on the building's 86th floor.
Getting it up there, of course, will be no easy task. While they'd usually airlift the vehicle onto the roof or lift it by crane, the spire protruding from atop the building makes approaching the narrow observation deck too dangerous, and no mobile crane can telescope the thousand-plus feet it would take to get the pony car up there.
Report: GM struggling to market turbo technology
Tue, 20 Apr 2010In the automotive realm, marketing can sometimes prove just as important as the actual product. Take, for instance, Ford's well regarded EcoBoost technology, which couples turbocharging with direct injection to produce more horsepower and reduce fuel consumption. Would it surprise you to hear that General Motors has had similar technology on the market for over three years?
It's true. GM's first turbocharged, direct injected powerplants hit the market for the 2007 model. The 2.0-liter Ecotec mills put down an impressive 260 horsepower and a matching 260 pound-feet of torque, and they were lauded by the press in the engine bays of the Pontiac Solstice, Saturn Sky, Chevrolet Cobalt SS and Chevrolet HHR SS. But few people outside a core group of enthusiasts actually remember this fact.
Says Uwe Grebe, executive director of GM's global advanced engineering, "We didn't have a badge and say, 'This is the most important thing we will put on all our brochures.'" Ford, however, did just that, and it's EcoBoost engines are right at the tips of all our tongues when we discuss today's most advanced powerplants. So, how does The General fix its mistake?