Find or Sell Used Cars, Trucks, and SUVs in USA

In Az - 2000 Ford Excursion Xlt 7.3l Diesel 4x4 Emergency Communication Vehicle on 2040-cars

US $29,500.00
Year:2000 Mileage:102328 Color: White /
 Blue
Location:

Phoenix, Arizona, United States

Phoenix, Arizona, United States
Advertising:
Vehicle Title:Clear
Fuel Type:Diesel
For Sale By:Dealer
Transmission:Automatic
Body Type:SUV
VIN: 1FMSU41FXYEC51397 Year: 2000
Warranty: Unspecified
Make: Ford
Model: Excursion
Options: Cassette, Compact Disc
Mileage: 102,328
Safety Features: Anti-Lock Brakes, Driver Side Airbag
Sub Model: XLT
Power Options: Air Conditioning, Cruise Control, Power Windows
Exterior Color: White
Interior Color: Blue
Number of Cylinders: 8
Doors: 4
Engine Description: 7.3L V8 DIR Turbo
Drivetrain: 4-Wheel Drive
Condition: Used: A vehicle is considered used if it has been registered and issued a title. Used vehicles have had at least one previous owner. The condition of the exterior, interior and engine can vary depending on the vehicle's history. See the seller's listing for full details and description of any imperfections. ... 

Auto Services in Arizona

Twentyfifth Street Automotive ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Parts & Supplies, Automotive Tune Up Service
Address: 4112 N 25th St, Guadalupe
Phone: (480) 447-6879

Tru-Tek ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Machine Shop, Machine Shops
Address: 541 E Juanita Ave # 6, Higley
Phone: (480) 424-4938

Thomas Bishop Automotive ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service
Address: 3414 E Washington St, Guadalupe
Phone: (602) 225-9225

Sonny`s Upholstery ★★★★★

Automobile Parts & Supplies, Patio Covers & Enclosures, Patio & Outdoor Furniture
Address: 323 W Southern Ave Suite B, Carefree
Phone: (480) 921-0077

Samson Body Shop Service Center Auto Glass Towing and RV Service ★★★★★

Automobile Body Repairing & Painting, Towing, Motor Homes
Address: 1709B Lizard Ln, Holbrook
Phone: (928) 297-0274

Ramirez Wheel Fashion ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Lifts-Automotive & Truck, Tire Dealers
Address: 4324 W Northern Ave, Goodyear
Phone: (623) 847-1804

Auto blog

Ford talking unibody Ranger replacement

Mon, 18 Feb 2013

Now here's some welcome news. Car and Driver reports Ford is seriously mulling a replacement for the recently deceased Ranger, but the successor to the compact pickup's throne may not look anything like what we've seen from the nameplate in the past.
While speaking at the 2013 Chicago Auto Show, Doug Scott, marketing manager for Ford Trucks, said there's still a market for a smaller pickup, but that buyers expect to see a larger differentiation between the smaller utility vehicles and their full size counterparts in price, capability and fuel economy.
According to Scott, that means a vehicle with a payload capacity of around 1,000 pounds paired with a towing capacity of 3,000 pounds and "a dramatic reduction in fuel consumption." But the biggest piece of that recipe is the price tag, and Scott says to keep the MSRP far enough away from the already cheap F-150, the answer could come in the form of a unibody design. Scott says target customers in this market don't care whether the truck has a traditional frame or not, so long as it's tough enough to do the job and has the capability they need.

Ford Mustang Mach-E fails Sweden's moose test

Wed, Sep 29 2021

The infamous moose test has claimed another casualty. This time it's the Ford Mustang Mach-E AWD Long Range, which was tested in an electric four-way alongside the Tesla Model Y, Hyundai Ioniq 5 and Skoda Enyaq iV (an electric utility vehicle closely related to the Volkswagen ID.4 that is sold in the United States). According to the Swedish testers at Teknikens Varld, Ford's electric car not only failed to hit the speed necessary for a passing grade, it didn't perform well at slower speeds, either. To pass the outlet's moose test, a car has to complete a rapid left-right-straight S-shaped pattern marked by cones at a speed of at least 72 km/h (44.7 miles per hour). The test is designed to mimic the type of avoidance maneuver a driver would have to take in order to avoid hitting something that wandered into the road, which in Sweden may be a moose but could just as easily be a deer or some other member of the animal kingdom elsewhere in the world, or possibly a child or car backing into the motorway. Not only is the maneuver very aggressive, it's also performed with weights belted into each seat and more weight added to the cargo area to hit the vehicle's maximum allowable carrying capacity. The Mustang Mach-E only managed to complete the moose test at 68 km/h (42.3 mph), well below the passing-grade threshold. Even at much lower speeds, Teknikens Varld says the Mach-E (which boasts the highest carrying capacity and was therefore loaded with more weight than the rest of the vehicles tested in this quartet) is "too soft in the chassis" and suffers from "too slow steering." Proving that it is indeed possible to pass the test, the Hyundai and Skoda completed the maneuver at the 44.7-mph figure required for a passing grade and the Tesla did it at 46.6 mph, albeit with less weight in the cargo area. It's not clear whether other versions of the Mustang Mach-E would pass the test. It's also unknown if Ford will make any changes to its chassis tuning or electronic stability control software, as some other automakers have done after a poor performance from Teknikens Varld, to improve its performance in the moose test. Related video:

American automakers fall in latest Fortune 500 rankings

Fri, 10 May 2013

Not that it means anything beyond bragging rights, but if you're fixated on the positions of domestic automakers on the annual Fortune 500 list, both General Motors and Ford are still on it but they've slipped a couple of notches. The list ranks American companies and they're ordered solely by revenue. GM, fifth last year, came in seventh, while Ford fell from ninth to tenth even though both companies saw small gains in annual revenue.
GM's $152.3 billion in revenue was less than a third of that of the first company on the list: Wal-Mart, which regained the title from Exxon Mobil. Berkshire Hathaway and Apple are the firms that moved GM down. Ford, displaced by energy company Valero, had $134.3 billion in revenue.
On a side note, profitability isn't a factor, but both GM and Ford were down in this year's list compared to last year's: GM declined from $9.2 billion to $6.2 billion, Ford fell from $20.2 billion to $5.6 billion. If profits were included, Exxon Mobil would probably still be king: although the energy company made almost $20 billion less in revenue than Wal-Mart's $469.2 billion, it posted $44.9 billion in profit compared to Wal-Mart's $17 billion.