1979 Ford Bronco Ranger 4x4 Xlt F150 1978 1977 1976 1975 1974 1973 1972 1971 on 2040-cars
Brown & Tan
Vancouver, WA, United States
For Sale By:Private Seller
Interior Color: Tan
Options: 4-Wheel Drive
Drive Type: 4x4
Sub Model: Ranger
Disability Equipped: No
Exterior Color: Brown & Tan
Condition: Used: A vehicle is considered used if it has been registered and issued a title. Used vehicles have had at least one previous owner. The condition of the exterior, interior and engine can vary depending on the vehicle's history. See the seller's listing for full details and description of any imperfections. ...
Ford Bronco for Sale
Auto Services in Washington
Automobile Parts & Supplies, Automobile Radios & Stereo Systems, Automobile Alarms & Security Systems
Address: 140 NE Broadway St, Orchards
Phone: (503) 257-0488
Automobile Body Repairing & Painting
Address: 418 W Wishkah St, Hoquiam
Phone: (360) 532-8766
Auto Repair & Service, New Car Dealers
Address: 11710 15th Ave NE, Kingston
Phone: (206) 364-0890
Auto Repair & Service, Auto Transmission, Auto Oil & Lube
Address: 2134 Pacific St, Bellingham
Phone: (360) 733-1280
Auto Repair & Service, Tire Dealers, Brake Repair
Address: 1901 Auburn Way N, Des-Moines
Phone: (253) 735-3363
Auto Repair & Service, Glass-Auto, Plate, Window, Etc, Windshield Repair
Phone: (206) 227-7174
Thu, 23 Jan 2014 20:00:00 EST
The Ford Focus ST has enjoyed a relatively calm, if brief, reign in the world of hot hatches. With nothing else in the class (in the States, at least) but the aging Mazdaspeed3 and Subaru Impreza WRX and the slow-selling Volkswagen Golf R, the Blue Oval's 252-horsepower five door has been the go-to vehicle for those that don't need the high-octane lunacy (and expense) of the rally bred Subaru Impreza WRX STI and Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution X.
Wed, 07 Aug 2013 12:33:00 EST
Now, though, as the new Subaru WRX (it's not an Impreza anymore, though, neither is it a hatchback...) starts to arrive at dealers, the Focus ST appears to be under threat for the first time. Naturally, Motor Trend is here to figure out which one is the best, with another one of its Head 2 Head videos. Host Jonny Lieberman puts both cars through their paces, going above and beyond, quite literally, at the very end of the video.
Have a look below and let us know what you think of MT's verdict in Comments.
The Ford Mustang is a brilliantly affordable source of horsepower, with a base 300-plus-horsepower version available for well under $30,000. Jumping up to about $35,000 will get you a solid 420 horsepower from a high-revving V8, while those with some extra disposable income can get a pair of 600-plus-horsepower monsters. Both the Roush Stage 3 with its Phase 3 package and Ford's factory Shelby GT500 even crest the 650-horsepower mark, with 675 and 662 ponies, respectively.
Fri, 10 May 2013 13:30:00 EST
Naturally, someone needed to find out which of these hi-po Mustangs was the quickest. And while this video is quite obviously a dealership commercial, at least there's some solid drag racing between two of the most powerful performance machines available for under $100,000.
With two NHRA drag racers at the wheel, the Stage 3 and GT500 go head to head for three races. Scroll down below to see the results in the full video.
Not that it means anything beyond bragging rights, but if you're fixated on the positions of domestic automakers on the annual Fortune 500 list, both General Motors and Ford are still on it but they've slipped a couple of notches. The list ranks American companies and they're ordered solely by revenue. GM, fifth last year, came in seventh, while Ford fell from ninth to tenth even though both companies saw small gains in annual revenue.
GM's $152.3 billion in revenue was less than a third of that of the first company on the list: Wal-Mart, which regained the title from Exxon Mobil. Berkshire Hathaway and Apple are the firms that moved GM down. Ford, displaced by energy company Valero, had $134.3 billion in revenue.
On a side note, profitability isn't a factor, but both GM and Ford were down in this year's list compared to last year's: GM declined from $9.2 billion to $6.2 billion, Ford fell from $20.2 billion to $5.6 billion. If profits were included, Exxon Mobil would probably still be king: although the energy company made almost $20 billion less in revenue than Wal-Mart's $469.2 billion, it posted $44.9 billion in profit compared to Wal-Mart's $17 billion.