2002 Chrysler Prowler on 2040-cars
Arriba, Colorado, United States
3.5L High-Output SOHC 24-valve aluminum V6. Miles per Gallon: 18 City, 23 Highway Horsepower: 253 Stock at 6,400
RPM, 255 pound-feet of torque at 3,950 RPM. Fuel Delivery - Sequential multipoint electronic fuel injection. Dual
throttle bodies induction, special exhaust. 90 amp alternator.
It has an aluminum block with a forged steel crank bedded in the four main bearings. It's been dressed-up, and
spiced up -- a less restrictive air cleaner, cast stainless steel exhaust manifolds that make tube-type headers
look primitive, and EFI linear cam throttle body for surprisingly quick, crisp response, so stay awake.
TRANSMISSION:
Auto Stick(r) feature of the four-speed electronically controlled automatic transaxle
Rear-mounted 4-speed electronically controlled auto transaxle with cooling radiator and Autostick Slapstick
Shifter/Overdrive
The final drive ratio is 3.89; individual gears are: First gear 2.842, 2nd.1.573, 3rd. 1.000, and 4th. 0.689
(overdrive)
Interior:
Front Head Room: 37.0
Front Hip Room: 51.2
Front Shoulder Room: 52.0
Front Leg Room: 43.0
Luggage Capacity: 2
Maximum Seating: 2
Length: 165.0
Width: 76.0
Height: 51.0
Wheelbase: 113.0
Ground Clearance: 4.5
Air Bags: Air bags, driver-side integral with steering wheel; Passenger-side (with on/off switch)- Located in the
dash instrument panel. Air bags are certified to the new Federal Regulations that allow less forceful air bags.
Air Conditioning: Climate Control System, CFC-free refrigerant with outlets located in the instrument panel,
Antenna: Windshield Integral
Brakes: 4-wheel power disc brakes, vented with highlighted calipers, Anti-Lock Braking system
Bumpers: Contrasting front and rear
Console: Center with armrest, cassette storage and cup holder
Convertible Top: Manual, cloth top (Black)
Cruise Control: Electronic control
Deck Lid Release: Remote
Defroster, Rear Window: Electric
Chrysler Prowler for Sale
Yes(US $18,000.00)
2001 chrysler prowler(US $11,040.00)
2002 chrysler prowler(US $18,100.00)
2002 chrysler prowler(US $12,200.00)
Chrysler: prowler(US $18,500.00)
2001 chrysler prowler(US $19,900.00)
Auto Services in Colorado
Werks Auto & Diesel Repair ★★★★★
Tito`s Cash for Cars ★★★★★
SVE Autobody ★★★★★
South Kipling Xpress Lube & Repair, Inc. ★★★★★
Sammy`s Used Cars ★★★★★
Randy`s Tire & Auto ★★★★★
Auto blog
Continental Automotive recalls 5 million airbag control units
Thu, Feb 4 2016Takata isn't the only supplier having airbag problems. Rival manufacturer Continental Automotive Systems announced a recall of 5 million airbag control units fitted to vehicles from Honda, Fiat Chrysler Automotive, Mercedes-Benz, and even a certain Chrysler-based Volkswagen. This sweeping recall has actually been in progress for some time, although the exact scope is only now becoming evident. In October of 2015, Mercedes-Benz recalled 2008 and 2009 model year C- and GLK-Class vehicles because their Continental-made airbag control units could corrode. Such a condition could cause the airbags to deploy without cause or warning, or in the event of a crash, not deploy at all. You can read all about it in our post from last year. Now, Continental's recall is going wide. Alongside the already recalled C and GLK, you've already heard about the 2008 and 2009 Honda Accord airbag recall, which we reported on yesterday. Now, Fiat Chrysler is announcing the recall of the 2009 Dodge Journey, as well as the 2008 and 2009 Dodge Grand Caravan, Chrysler Town and Country, and their rebadged counterpart, the Volkswagen Routan. Yes, one manufacturer is recalling another manufacturer's vehicle. The models listed above only amount to about 580,000 vehicles out of 5 million bad airbag control units. And since Continental will notify manufacturers who will then issue their own recalls, it's extremely likely that more brands and vehicles will be ensnared. Stay tuned. Related Video: News Source: NHTSA via Automotive News - sub. req.Image Credit: Fabian Bimmer / Reuters Recalls Chrysler Dodge Fiat Honda Mercedes-Benz Safety Crossover Minivan/Van Sedan FCA
FCA recalls 1.1 million vehicles worldwide due to confusing shifter
Fri, Apr 22 2016Fiat Chrysler is recalling 1.1 million vehicles worldwide to address the problematic shifter used on cars with eight-speed automatic transmissions. The issue is that the console-mounted shifter acts like a rocker switch and always returns to the middle position after moved. This has been deemed confusing to drivers – confusing enough to cause some to exit their vehicles without first selecting Park and leading to the car rolling away. FCA says 41 injuries are related to the shifter problem, and no evidence of equipment failure has been found. The company will enhance warning chimes and alter the shift strategy, meaning alert messages will be displayed in case the driver door is opened while the engine is running. With the door open, the transmission will prevent the car from moving even if Park is not selected. The affected vehicles are certain model-year 2012–2014 Dodge Charger and Chrysler 300 sedans, as well as model-year 2014–2015 Jeep Grand Cherokee SUVs, an estimated 811,586 US vehicles in total. The recall also affects 52,144 vehicles in Canada, 16,805 in Mexico, and 248,667 vehicles elsewhere. The shifter is used with ZF-designed and ZF-built eight-speed automatic; Audi uses a similar shifter setup in some of its vehicles, including the current-generation, which predated Chrysler's use of it. Chrysler uses a different, a rotating-dial-type shifter on eight-speed-equipped Rams. The company moved away from the problem shifter design in 2015 for the Charger and 300, and the Grand Cherokee's shift lever was modified for 2016. Owners of affected vehicles will be notified of the recall when service is available. Fiat Chrysler urges customers to follow the instructions in the vehicle's owner's manual in the meantime. Related Video: News Source: FCAImage Credit: AOL Recalls Chrysler Dodge Jeep RAM Ownership Safety SUV Sedan
Appeals court delays 'sensible resolution' meeting between GM, Fiat Chrysler CEOs
Tue, Jun 30 2020DETROIT — Three federal appeals judges have delayed a court-ordered meeting between the CEOs of General Motors and Fiat Chrysler to try to settle a lawsuit over corruption by union leaders. U.S. District Court Judge Paul Borman last week ordered GM CEO Mary Barra and FCA CEO Mike Manley to meet before July 1. But GM on Friday asked the federal appeals court in Cincinnati to overturn the order and remove Borman from the case. In an order issued Monday, three appellate judges delayed Borman's order to provide time to consider legal points raised by GM. GM is suing crosstown rival FCA alleging that it got an advantage by paying off United Auto Workers union leaders to reduce labor costs during contract talks. FCAÂ’s former labor chief, Al Iacobelli, is in prison, although the company denies that it directed any prohibited payments. In his order last week, Borman described the lawsuit as a “nuclear option” that would be a “waste of time and resources” for years if he allows the case to move forward. The judge ordered Barra and Manley to sit down without lawyers by July 1 and reach a “sensible resolution of this huge legal distraction.” Borman wants an update from them on a public video conference that same day. Over the weekend he modified the order to allow lawyers to attend the meeting. In a court filing, GM called BormanÂ’s order a “profound abuse” of power. “The court possesses no authority to order the CEOs of GM and FCA to engage in settlement discussions, reach a resolution and then appear alone at a pretrial conference eight days later, without counsel,” GMÂ’s attorneys said. “Second, the court has no business labeling a properly filed federal lawsuit assigned to the court for impartial adjudication ‘a distractionÂ’ or a ‘nuclear option,’” GM said. Borman canÂ’t be viewed as impartial, company lawyers said. The judge declined to comment. In a court filing Monday, Fiat Chrysler lawyers wrote that GM didn't make a good case to remove Borman because judges routinely direct lawsuit parties to talk about settling. The lawyers wrote that GM originally wanted the case assigned to Borman but now apparently is worried that his tough questions mean he will dismiss GM's claims. “GM should not be permitted now to complain that that judge has turned out to be less hospitable to GMÂ’s claims than GM anticipated. Parties are not permitted to engage in such judge shopping," the filing said.


