Clear Carfax One Owner Nav Dvd Third Row Leather Pdc Inspected Warranty Auto Awd on 2040-cars
Peabody, Massachusetts, United States
Vehicle Title:Clear
Engine:3.5L 3497CC 215Cu. In. V6 GAS SOHC Naturally Aspirated
For Sale By:Dealer
Body Type:Sport Utility
Fuel Type:GAS
Make: Chrysler
Warranty: Unspecified
Model: Pacifica
Trim: Limited Sport Utility 4-Door
Options: Sunroof
Power Options: Power Locks
Drive Type: AWD
Mileage: 109,814
Sub Model: 4dr Limited
Number of Cylinders: 6
Exterior Color: Other
Chrysler Pacifica for Sale
- 2006 chrysler pacifica touring awd sunroof nav dvd 74k texas direct auto(US $11,980.00)
- 2004 chrysler pacifica clean driven 6 passenger power pkg
- 2004 chrysler pacifica ultra clean low miles fl driven 6 passenger power pkg(US $8,500.00)
- Local lexus trade in-very clean-3 month warranty!(US $8,668.00)
- 2005(05)pacifica awd we finance bad credit! buy here pay here low down $1699(US $11,497.00)
- 2004 chrysler pacifica base sport utility 4-door 3.5l(US $3,000.00)
Auto Services in Massachusetts
Tiny & Sons Glass ★★★★★
Tint King Inc. ★★★★★
The Weymouth Auto Mall ★★★★★
R & R Garage ★★★★★
Quirk Chrysler Jeep ★★★★★
Post Road Used Auto Parts ★★★★★
Auto blog
Chrysler recalling over 280k minivans because airbags may deploy on wrong side
Mon, 08 Jul 2013Chrysler has issued a recall for some 2013 Town & Country, Dodge Grand Caravan and Ram C/V Tradesman vans built between May 10, 2012 and June 7, 2013. These vehicles may have a software error that would cause the wrong side (opposite side) airbags to deploy in a crash. With this defect, a left-side impact would cause the right-side airbag to deploy, etc.
The recall affects 281,500 vehicles in total: 224k in the US, 49,300 in Canada, 2,900 in Mexico and 5,300 in other locations. Chrysler will notify owners of effected vehicles, and reflash the offending occupant restraint control module to resolve the issue. Scroll down to read the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration press release.
Detroit Three autoworkers could get huge bonuses
Mon, 06 Jan 2014For a long time, being a line worker for one of the Detroit Three has meant living with an uncertain future. With the health of American automakers on the rise, though, things are also starting to look up for the men and women building the cars. The latest sign that things aren't bad? Big profit-sharing checks.
According to The Detroit News, Ford, General Motors and Chrysler could end up paying over $800 million to 130,000 workers as part of a profit-sharing plan. According to The News, the economic impact of these profits in Michigan alone could exceed $400 million, besting the NFL's Super Bowl, MLB's All-Star Game and the NHL's Winter Classic for their economic impact.
This is the third straight year the Detroit Three have issued profit-sharing checks to UAW employees, and for many workers, the checks are as close as they'll get to a raise, due to the most recent contract between the union and the manufacturers. On average, employees at GM and Ford receive $1 for every $1 million in North American (not just the US) pre-tax profits. Chrysler, meanwhile, gets a similar deal, although the Auburn Hills-based company calculates profit sharing using 85 percent of the brand's global profits.
Move over Audi, now Chrysler has a beef with Tesla's claims
Thu, 23 May 2013In the same week that Audi said "not so fast" to some claims from Tesla, Chrysler has responded to a new press release from the California-based EV-maker by saying "not exactly, Tesla." The statement, released through the company's blog, comes in response to Tesla claiming it was "the only American car company to have fully repaid the government." Chrysler notes that it, too, recently paid back Uncle Sam from its 2008 bailout. Similar to Audi's recent press release, which was eventually and mysteriously deleted from the German automaker's site, Chrysler is both right and wrong in its statement.
Tesla specifically said that it had paid back the Department of Energy loans that many automakers received - including Fisker and VPG Autos - while Chrysler's retort argues Tesla is "unmistakably incorrect" since it repaid the government in 2011 a full six years early. Technically, the statements from both automakers are correct, but Tesla's startup loan originated from the DoE, while Chrysler's loan came in bailout form from the Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP). Further, as The Detroit News notes, Chrysler's loan still cost taxpayers well over a billion dollars after all was said and done - those negative assets tied to "old Chrysler" in the bankruptcy did not require repayment.