Find or Sell Used Cars, Trucks, and SUVs in USA

Very Clean 2004 Chrysler Pt Cruiser on 2040-cars

US $3,500.00
Year:2004 Mileage:162628 Color: Blue /
 Gray
Location:

Durham, North Carolina, United States

Durham, North Carolina, United States
Body Type:Wagon
Vehicle Title:Clear
Engine:2.4 ll 4 dohc 16 v
Fuel Type:Gasoline
For Sale By:Private Seller
Transmission:Automatic
VIN: 3C4FY48B54T316986 Year: 2004
Make: Chrysler
Model: PT Cruiser
Options: CD Player
Power Options: Air Conditioning, Power Windows
Mileage: 162,628
Exterior Color: Blue
Interior Color: Gray
Trim: Base
Drive Type: FWD
Condition: UsedA vehicle is considered used if it has been registered and issued a title. Used vehicles have had at least one previous owner. The condition of the exterior, interior and engine can vary depending on the vehicle's history. See the seller's listing for full details and description of any imperfections.Seller Notes:"Very clean 2004 Chrysler PT Cruiser. 162,628 miles. Super cold A/C. All features work. It's a smooth ride. To view or test drive contact: Esco at (919) 624-9247"

Auto Services in North Carolina

Wheel Works ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Parts & Supplies, Tire Dealers
Address: 6300 Robertson Pond Rd, Raleigh
Phone: (919) 365-5500

Vintage & Modern European Service ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service
Address: 2809 Indiana Ave Ext, Aberdeen
Phone: (910) 944-1023

Victory Lane Quick Oil Change ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Auto Oil & Lube, Automobile Inspection Stations & Services
Address: 131 Wakelon St, Wendell
Phone: (919) 269-5205

Valvoline Instant Oil Change ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Auto Oil & Lube, Automotive Tune Up Service
Address: 4417 S 17th St, Leland
Phone: (910) 392-7279

University Ford North ★★★★★

New Car Dealers, Used Car Dealers, Automobile Leasing
Address: 5331 N Roxboro Rd, Rougemont
Phone: (919) 536-3673

University Auto Imports Inc ★★★★★

Used Car Dealers
Address: 601 W Franklin St, Rtp
Phone: (919) 240-4612

Auto blog

Chrysler readying 20 Moparized vehicles for SEMA

Tue, 08 Oct 2013

The Las Vegas Convention Center has plenty of space for aftermarket companies and automakers to show off their wares, and it looks like Chrysler is taking advantage of the spacious floor plan. At next month's SEMA Show, Chrysler will have a full 20 cars from its six brands decked out with Mopar gear.
As a hint of what is to come, Chrysler released a handful of teaser sketches showing glimpses of modified Jeep Cherokee, Ram 1500, Fiat 500L and Chrysler 300 concept vehicles. The automaker will also use the venue to show off a new line of Jeep Performance Parts offered by the all-new Mopar Off-Road Division. In addition to the images, Chrysler also issued a brief press release - posted below - breaking down some of the "industry-first features" that Mopar has offered in recent years.

Are you the 2015 Chrysler 300?

Tue, 16 Sep 2014

When Chrysler showed us its hand and revealed its five-year product plan to the world, we learned that the updated 300 sedan will bow at the LA Auto Show in November. Now, thanks to Allpar, we might have our first (super grainy) look at the new sedan a full two months ahead of its official debut.
Unlike its Dodge Charger platform mate, the new 300 isn't really all that different from the model currently on sale. That said, we're not sure if the changes shown here really reflect styling that we'd call "better," with the company's logo sort of floating at the top of the grille, and a more simplistic front end that lets the schnoz stick out a bit. Again, nothing drastic to talk about, but the new tweaks are kind of weak. Of course, we'll wait until we see the finished product in the metal before we make up our minds.
Don't expect things to change too much in terms of interior refinement or powertrain offerings, as well, with all the same leather and technology we've enjoyed in the 300 before, and the usual 3.6-liter Pentastar V6 and 5.7-liter Hemi V8 powertrain options. We'll know for sure when the car shows its freshened face in Los Angeles in November.

Is it time for American carmakers to give up on dual-clutch transmissions? [w/poll]

Mon, 22 Jul 2013

Last week, in the midst of Detroit's first days seeking relief in Chapter 9 of the bankruptcy code, Automotive News contributor Larry P. Vellequette penned an editorial suggesting that American car companies raise the white flag on dual clutch transmissions and give up on trying to persuade Americans to buy cars fitted with them. Why? Because, Vellequette says, like CVT transmissions, they "just don't sound right or feel right to American drivers." (Note: In the article, it's not clear if Vellequette is arguing against wet-clutch and dry-clutch DCTs or just dry-clutch DCTs, which is what Ford and Chrysler use.) The article goes on to state that Ford and Chrysler have experimented with DCTs and that both consumers and the automotive press haven't exactly given them glowing reviews, despite their quicker shifts and increased fuel efficiency potential compared to torque-converter automatic transmissions.
Autoblog staffers who weighed in on the relevance of DCTs in American cars generally disagreed with the blanket nature of Vellequette's statement that they don't sound or feel right, but admit that their lack of refinement compared to traditional automatics can be an issue for consumers. That's particularly true in workaday cars like the Ford Focus and Dodge Dart, both of which have come in for criticism in reviews and owner surveys. From where we sit, the higher-performance orientation of such transmissions doesn't always meld as well with the marching orders of everyday commuters (particularly if drivers haven't been educated as to the transmission's benefits and tradeoffs), and in models not fitted with paddle shifters, it's particularly hard for drivers to use a DCT to its best advantage.
Finally, we also note that DCT tuning is very much an evolving science. For instance, Autoblog editors who objected to dual-clutch tuning in the Dart have more recently found the technology agreeable in the Fiat 500L. Practice makes perfect - or at least more acceptable.