Find or Sell Used Cars, Trucks, and SUVs in USA

S Automatic Power Windows Wing Alloy Wheels on 2040-cars

Year:2010 Mileage:52667 Color: Silver /
 Black
Location:

Canton, Massachusetts, United States

Canton, Massachusetts, United States
Advertising:
Body Type:Sedan
Engine:4
Vehicle Title:Clear
Fuel Type:Gasoline
For Sale By:Dealer
Transmission:Automatic
VIN: 1NXBU4EE3AZ180587 Year: 2010
Make: Toyota
Cab Type (For Trucks Only): Other
Model: Corolla
Warranty: Vehicle does NOT have an existing warranty
Mileage: 52,667
Sub Model: S
Exterior Color: Silver
Disability Equipped: No
Interior Color: Black
Doors: 4
Drive Train: Front Wheel Drive
Condition: Used: A vehicle is considered used if it has been registered and issued a title. Used vehicles have had at least one previous owner. The condition of the exterior, interior and engine can vary depending on the vehicle's history. See the seller's listing for full details and description of any imperfections. ... 

Auto Services in Massachusetts

Woody`s Tire Service ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Tire Dealers, Tire Recap, Retread & Repair
Address: 80 Garden St, Belmont
Phone: (978) 674-7550

Walnut Hill Auto Body ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Body Repairing & Painting
Address: 235 Lowell St, Somerville
Phone: (978) 674-7550

Sudbury Volvo Service ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, New Car Dealers
Address: 684 Boston Post Rd, Lexington
Phone: (978) 443-3833

Southeast Truck Ctr Inc ★★★★★

Automobile Parts & Supplies, New Truck Dealers, Truck Equipment & Parts
Address: 147 State Rd, Monument-Beach
Phone: (508) 888-1977

Sal`s Auto & Truck Repair ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Towing
Address: Ashby
Phone: (978) 263-2614

S & L Auto Service ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Auto Oil & Lube
Address: 16 Southbridge Rd, Whitinsville
Phone: (508) 461-9950

Auto blog

Subprime financing on the rise in new car sales, leasing too

Fri, 07 Dec 2012

We all remember the financial crisis that began several years back. At its core was a splurge of subprime lending for housing loans. The housing bubble burst, triggering a collapse of the mortgage-backed securities market. Apparently, those types of loans still exist in the automotive industry, and the market share for these types of "nonprime, subprime, and deep subprime," loans has grown 13.6 percent compared to the third quarter a year ago.
According to an Automotive News report, high-risk lending expanded to 24.8 percent of total loans in Q3, up from 21.9 percent for this time last year. As this level increased, average credit scores of borrowers dropped to 755, down from 763 a year ago. In that time, the average financing amount increased $90 per vehicle, to $25,963.
At 818, Volvo maintains the highest per-owner credit score, while Mitsubishi has the lowest, at 694. The highest rate of borrowers was at Toyota, with 14 percent of the market, followed by Ford with 13.1 percent and Chevrolet at 11.1.

Toyota RAV4 EV recalled for Tesla motor assembly software problem

Thu, Mar 12 2015

As we noted this morning, Toyota is recalling 112,500 cars and SUVs to fix problems with electric power steering controls and electric vehicle software. The largest of two recalls announced yesterday cover about 110,000 2015 Camry midsize sedans and Highlander SUVs, as well as 2014 and 2015 RAV4 SUVs. There is a specific problem for those RAV4s that are also of the electric variety, which Toyota built with Tesla help from 2012 through 2014. This recall covers 2,500 RAV4 electric vehicles. Software in a motor assembly can make the vehicles shift into neutral on their own. Toyota says it knows of no crashes or injuries that resulted from the problem. For the non-EV-specific recalls, Toyota says a circuit board in the electric power steering may have been damaged at the factory. Power-assisted steering could fail, increasing the effort needed to steer and raising the risk of a crash. Dealers will inspect and replace power steering controls if needed. Related Video: The AP contributed to this report. Featured Gallery 2012 Toyota RAV4 EV: First Drive View 22 Photos News Source: Bloomberg Green Recalls Tesla Toyota Electric rav4 ev toyota rav4 ev

IIHS: Drivers safer than passengers in frontal crash test

Thu, Jun 23 2016

The Insurance Institute for Highway Safety introduced a small overlap frontal crash test in 2012 that replicates what happens when the front corner of a car impacts another object. In the test, vehicles travel at a speed of 40 mph toward a five-foot-tall barrier with 25 percent of the total width of the car striking the barrier on the driver side. One would assume that vehicles with good small overlap front ratings would protect the driver and the passenger equally. But a recent study from the IIHS proves that passengers aren't as protected as drivers. The IIHS conducted the test on seven small SUVs with good driver-side small overlap ratings and only one of the vehicles, the 2016 Hyundai Tucson, performed well enough to be given a good rating. The other SUVs performance ranged from poor to acceptable. After reviewing the results of the test, the IIHS is deliberating whether it should institute a passenger-side rating as part of its Top Safety Pick criteria. "This is an important aspect of occupant protection that needs more attention," states Becky Mueller, lead author of the study and an IIHS senior research engineer. "More than 1,600 right-front passengers died in frontal crashes in 2014." Since the small overlap front test was introduced, 13 automakers have made structural changes to 97 vehicles with roughly three-quarters earning a good rating after the adjustments. The IIHS' test for frontal ratings is completed with a dummy in the driver's seat and with a barrier overlapping the driver's side. Which makes sense, as passengers aren't always riding in a vehicle. "It's not surprising that automakers would focus their initial efforts to improve small overlap protection on the side of the vehicle that we conduct the tests on," states David Zuby, IIHS executive vice president and chief research officer. "In fact, we encouraged them to do that in the short term if it mean they could quickly make driver-side improvements to more vehicles. As time goes by, though, we would hope they ensure similar levels of protection on both sides." As the IIHS' test revealed, there's a massive difference in safety between the two front seats. Increase passenger safety, according to Mueller, would require automakers to strengthen the occupant compartment by using a different type of material or by making it thicker.