Find or Sell Used Cars, Trucks, and SUVs in USA

1985 Toyota Celica Gts Convertable on 2040-cars

Year:1985 Mileage:88936 Color: White
Location:

Alexandria, Virginia, United States

Alexandria, Virginia, United States
Advertising:
Body Type:Coupe
Vehicle Title:Clear
Fuel Type:GAS
Engine:4 cylinder
Transmission:Manual
For Sale By:Private Seller
VIN: JT5RA65K3F4057128 Year: 1985
Make: Toyota
Model: Celica
Options: Convertible
Mileage: 88,936
Sub Model: GTS
Trim: 2 Door Convertable
Exterior Color: White
Number of Cylinders: 4
Drive Type: Manual
Condition: Used: A vehicle is considered used if it has been registered and issued a title. Used vehicles have had at least one previous owner. The condition of the exterior, interior and engine can vary depending on the vehicle's history. See the seller's listing for full details and description of any imperfections. ... 

1985 Toyota Celica GTS convertable with very low mileage.  We bought the car from a friend a few years ago.  When we bought it the car had over 88000 miles, we have literally driven it 500 miles and sinse it just sits in the driveway figured it was time to let it go.  The original owner babied this car, he and his daughters were the only ones to drive it from 85 until 2011 when we picked it up.  The car is mechanically sound.  Runs great and the convertable roof is in nice condition.  There are a few rust spots starting to develop which will need to be addressed.  We will be out of town for the 4th so buyer will need to pick it up a within couple days of the auction ending or wait until after the 6th of July. 

Auto Services in Virginia

West Broad Hyundai ★★★★★

New Car Dealers, Used Car Dealers
Address: 7100 W Broad St, Manakin-Sabot
Phone: (804) 755-6215

Virginia Tire & Auto Of Falls Church ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Used Car Dealers, Automobile Parts & Supplies
Address: 7231 Arlington Blvd, Springfield
Phone: (703) 560-0071

Virginia Auto Inc ★★★★★

Used Car Dealers, Truck Rental, Trailer Renting & Leasing
Address: 2704 Williamson Rd NW, Hollins-College
Phone: (540) 366-2773

Total Auto Service ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service
Address: 101 N Cumberland Ave, Rose-Hill
Phone: (606) 573-9700

Shorty`s Garage ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Parts & Supplies, Mufflers & Exhaust Systems
Address: 43 Kelley Rd, Somerville
Phone: (540) 373-4236

Rosner Volvo Of Fredericksburg ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, New Car Dealers
Address: 3410 Fall Hill Avenue, Snell
Phone: (540) 373-5200

Auto blog

2014 Toyota Corolla

Tue, 27 Aug 2013

Reprising The Recipe For A Perfect Slice Of Toast
My toaster broke the other week. Halfway through the process of cooking my gourmet Pop-Tart breakfast, the thing crapped out with a small bang, leaving my delicious morning treats trapped inside. To rectify the situation, I ventured out to a big box store, located the toaster aisle, and ran a couple of questions through my mind. Do I need two slots or four? Do I need to spend more than 20 bucks on this thing? Should I just buy a toaster oven to give me a wider range of bachelor-pad cooking functionality? After no more than two minutes of contemplation, I grabbed the cheapest one on the shelf, paid and left the store. The new toaster works just fine.
This sort of unemotional shopping experience is how I suspect people decide to purchase the Toyota Corolla. It's a perfectly fine appliance, and to a good number of people in the world, the bond between a car and a driver is no more important than the connection I feel to my toaster. Does it seat four people relatively comfortably? Does it get decent fuel economy? Is it easy to drive? Reliable? Safe? The Corolla checks all of these boxes, and because of that, Toyota managed to move just under 300,000 examples of the tenth-generation car in 2012 (though that number does include sales of the Corolla-based, now-deceased Matrix) - a vehicle that, at the time, was already six years old.

Toyota's HaMo urban mobility carsharing program comes to France

Mon, Sep 22 2014

We're guessing no one's nuts enough to try to take one of Toyota's three-wheeled leaning electric i-Road vehicles up into the French Alps. Still, the town of Grenoble, France, which sits at the foot of the mountains, has received 35 of those vehicles as part of a carsharing pilot program. Toyota's thrown in 35 four-wheel Auto Body COMS vehicles into the program as well. Grenoble, which is about 200 miles north of Marseille, was presumably chosen because of existing carsharing programs run by Cite-lib. This program, dubbed "Cite lib by Ha:mo," goes a little more futuristic, though, as it's part of what Toyota calls its "Ha:mo" plan (Ha:mo is short for "harmonious mobility"). The program will run for three years and includes 27 charging stations near bus lines and train stations. The public will be charged anywhere from three to 19 euros ($3.80 to $24.50 US) to use the vehicles for between 15 minutes and four hours. The good news is that drivers can pick up the vehicles in one location and drop them off in another. Toyota started testing the i-Road vehicles in Toyota City, Japan, this past March. The trike is about three feet wide and has a top speed of 28 miles per hour. Check out Toyota's press release below and read AutoblogGreen's "First Drive" impressions of the i-Road here. "Cite lib by Ha:mo", a New Type of Urban Mobility Based on Ultra-Compact Electric Vehicles Connected to Public Transport, Launches in Grenoble, France This innovative car-sharing service aims to prepare the City and agglomeration of Grenoble for electric mobility within a comprehensive multi-modal mobility plan. The three-year trial project brings together the competencies and services of five partners: the City of Grenoble, the Metro Area, French electricity company EDF and its affiliate Sodetrel, Toyota, and Cite lib, the local car-sharing operator. 35 three-wheel Toyota i-ROAD and 35 four-wheel Toyota Auto Body COMS will be available for short city trips in 27 charging stations installed and operated by Sodetrel - including for one-way trips from one station to another. A total of 120 charging points for the project and 41 for other plug-in vehicles will be added to the city's transport infrastructure. A simple pricing plan dubbed "3, 2, 1 euros" for respectively the first, second and third 15-minute increments will be proposed to Grenoble citizens.

IIHS: Drivers safer than passengers in frontal crash test

Thu, Jun 23 2016

The Insurance Institute for Highway Safety introduced a small overlap frontal crash test in 2012 that replicates what happens when the front corner of a car impacts another object. In the test, vehicles travel at a speed of 40 mph toward a five-foot-tall barrier with 25 percent of the total width of the car striking the barrier on the driver side. One would assume that vehicles with good small overlap front ratings would protect the driver and the passenger equally. But a recent study from the IIHS proves that passengers aren't as protected as drivers. The IIHS conducted the test on seven small SUVs with good driver-side small overlap ratings and only one of the vehicles, the 2016 Hyundai Tucson, performed well enough to be given a good rating. The other SUVs performance ranged from poor to acceptable. After reviewing the results of the test, the IIHS is deliberating whether it should institute a passenger-side rating as part of its Top Safety Pick criteria. "This is an important aspect of occupant protection that needs more attention," states Becky Mueller, lead author of the study and an IIHS senior research engineer. "More than 1,600 right-front passengers died in frontal crashes in 2014." Since the small overlap front test was introduced, 13 automakers have made structural changes to 97 vehicles with roughly three-quarters earning a good rating after the adjustments. The IIHS' test for frontal ratings is completed with a dummy in the driver's seat and with a barrier overlapping the driver's side. Which makes sense, as passengers aren't always riding in a vehicle. "It's not surprising that automakers would focus their initial efforts to improve small overlap protection on the side of the vehicle that we conduct the tests on," states David Zuby, IIHS executive vice president and chief research officer. "In fact, we encouraged them to do that in the short term if it mean they could quickly make driver-side improvements to more vehicles. As time goes by, though, we would hope they ensure similar levels of protection on both sides." As the IIHS' test revealed, there's a massive difference in safety between the two front seats. Increase passenger safety, according to Mueller, would require automakers to strengthen the occupant compartment by using a different type of material or by making it thicker.