1995 Toyota Avalon Xls on 2040-cars
State College, Pennsylvania, United States
Body Type:Sedan
Vehicle Title:Clear
Engine:3.0L 2995CC V6 GAS DOHC Naturally Aspirated
Fuel Type:GAS
For Sale By:Private Seller
Model: Avalon
Trim: XLS Sedan 4-Door
Options: Sunroof, Cassette Player, Leather Seats, CD Player
Drive Type: FWD
Safety Features: Anti-Lock Brakes, Driver Airbag
Mileage: 119,146
Power Options: Air Conditioning, Cruise Control, Power Locks, Power Windows, Power Seats
Exterior Color: White
Interior Color: neutral leather
Number of Cylinders: 6
Warranty: Vehicle does NOT have an existing warranty
It appears the the following items have been repaired by the previous owner.
The portion of the exhaust from the CATALYTIC CONVERTOR forward to the engine has been replaced, the rest of the exhaust is in good shape.
TIRE AND BRAKES have been replaced just prior to inspection, both most likely have less than 2000 miles.
I was able to pull away the TIMING BELT cover and see the belt. It had, made in USA printed on the belt, most likely the timing belt has been replaced at least once.
I believe if the belt was oem, the belt would have Toyota or Asian name printed on it.
Since I have had the car, I put in a NEW BATTERY, replaced the SPARK PLUGS plugs and the VALVE COVER GASKETS.
I just changed the OIL.
This car is being sold as-is, but many of the routine maintenance issues should not be a concern for sometime.
The driver's side door lock will not allow the key to be push in. The car does have one FOB.
There is a small leak coming from the left rack and pinion seal. This should not be a major problem. I noticed another auction on Avalon on Ebay had the same problem, the owner used Lucas Stop Leak Power Steering fluid, and occasionally get a small spot on the driveway.
The driver's seatbelt does not retract very well, but it does slowly.
The car does have it's share of dings and scrapes, shown the best I could in photos. The are not severe, the most visible is the scraping of the bumpers, revealing the black plastic underneath. The area below the trunk and above the bumper has been pushed in, the trunks close well.
It has a after market stereo. Alpine CDE 122 with USB port.
Interior is in good condition.
KBB price value is $3059.00
I have the reserve at $2950.00. This vehicle is listed locally. I will consider other bids if the reserve is not met.
I believe I have describe this vehicle fairly and appropriately.
Toyota Avalon for Sale
We finance! limited leather moonroof htd&a/c seats alloys non smoker unbeatable!(US $16,900.00)
2006 toyota avalon touring only 63k miles! heated seats moonroof xenons jbl wow$(US $13,800.00)
2011 toyota avalon limited
2012 avalon limited navigation hid headlamps only 7k miles! very clean!
2008 toyota avalon limited sedan 4-door 3.5l(US $20,990.00)
Touring, 3.5 v6, black leather, extra clean, warranty !!!(US $8,995.00)
Auto Services in Pennsylvania
Zirkle`s Garage ★★★★★
Young`s Auto Transit ★★★★★
Wolbert Auto Body and Repair ★★★★★
Wilkie Lexus ★★★★★
Vo Automotive ★★★★★
Vince`s Auto Service ★★★★★
Auto blog
Poor headlights cause 40 cars to miss IIHS Top Safety Pick rating
Mon, Aug 6 2018Over the past few months, we've noticed a number of cars and SUVs that have come incredibly close to earning one of the IIHS's highest accolades, the Top Safety Pick rating. They have great crash test scores and solid automatic emergency braking and forward collision warning systems. What trips them up is headlights. That got us wondering, how many vehicles are there that are coming up short because they don't have headlights that meet the organization's criteria for an "Acceptable" or "Good" rating. This is a revision made after 2017, a year in which headlights weren't factored in for this specific award. This is also why why some vehicles, such as the Ford F-150, might have had the award last year, but have lost it for this year. We reached out to someone at IIHS to find out. He responded with the following car models. Depending on how you count, a whopping 40 models crash well enough to receive the rating, but don't get it because their headlights are either "Poor" or "Marginal." We say depending on how you count because the IIHS actual counts truck body styles differently, and the Infiniti Q70 is a special case. Apparently the version of the Q70 that has good headlights doesn't have adequate forward collision prevention technology. And the one that has good forward collision tech doesn't have good enough headlights. We've provided the entire list of vehicles below in alphabetical order. Interestingly, it seems the Volkswagen Group is having the most difficulty providing good headlights with its otherwise safe cars. It had the most models on the list at 9 split between Audi and Volkswagen. GM is next in line with 7 models. It is worth noting again that though these vehicles have subpar headlights and don't quite earn Top Safety Pick awards, that doesn't mean they're unsafe. They all score well enough in crash testing and forward collision prevention that they would get the coveted award if the lights were better.
L.A. show, Chevy Colorado AEV Bison, Acura Integra, RDX | Autoblog Podcast #705
Fri, Nov 19 2021In this episode of the Autoblog Podcast, Editor-in-Chief Greg Migliore is joined by Road Test Editor Zac Palmer. This week, they talk about driving the Chevy Colorado ZR2 AEV Bison, Audi A3 and S3, Toyota Corolla XSE hatchback and the new Acura RDX. As for news, they discuss the reveal of the new Acura Integra, and talk about what's new at the 2021 L.A. Auto Show. Finally, they help a listener pick a car from the list of their childhood favorites. Send us your questions for the Mailbag and Spend My Money at: Podcast@Autoblog.com. Autoblog Podcast #705 Get The Podcast Apple Podcasts – Subscribe to the Autoblog Podcast in iTunes Spotify – Subscribe to the Autoblog Podcast on Spotify RSS – Add the Autoblog Podcast feed to your RSS aggregator MP3 – Download the MP3 directly Rundown What we're driving 2022 Chevy Colorado ZR2 AEV Bison 2022 Audi A3 and S3 2022 Toyota Corolla XSE Hatchback 2022 Acura RDX News: 2023 Acura Integra revealed 2021 L.A. Auto Show Spend My Money: Nostalgia purchase Feedback Email – Podcast@Autoblog.com Review the show on Apple Podcasts Autoblog is now live on your smart speakers and voice assistants with the audio Autoblog Daily Digest. Say “Hey Google, play the news from Autoblog” or "Alexa, open Autoblog" to get your favorite car website in audio form every day. A narrator will take you through the biggest stories or break down one of our comprehensive test drives. Related Video: 2022 Porsche Taycan GTS Sport Turismo at the L.A. Auto Show
EPA says automakers ahead of schedule for 54.5 MPG by 2025
Sat, Apr 26 2014Remember, the target is 54.5 miles per gallon by 2025. Today, the CAFE level is a little over 30. How we get from here to there is something the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is monitoring closely. Thus, the EPA just released an annual flash report on how the auto industry is progressing towards meeting the nation's fuel economy goals. Overall, the industry is doing almost 10 grams per mile (equivalent) better than the rules require. The good news is that the industry is a bit ahead of schedule. In the report (see page iii), the EPA breaks things down by automaker based only on MY12 numbers. Tesla is at the top of the list (which is ranked by over-compliance with 2012MY CO2 standards), but for our money, the real leader is Toyota. The Japanese automaker built the second-highest number of vehicles (2,020,248, after General Motors' 2,364,374) but racked up the most net 2012 over-compliance credits (13,163,009 metric tons). That's an average of over 6.5 metric tons per vehicle. The next closest is Honda, with just over five metric tons of credits per vehicle. Given the MPG fiasco with Hyundai and Kia, the EPA says, "we are excluding Hyundai and Kia data because of the ongoing investigation into their testing methods," but overall, the rest of the industry has credits worth 25,053,168 metric tons of CO2, which means it's doing almost 10 grams per mile (equivalent) better than the rules require. Go team. For now, the numbers in this report (and there are a lot more of them – get the 59-page PDF for yourself here), can't really be used to understand everything from the first year of the new CAFE program. The EPA writes, "Because the program allows credits and deficits to be carried into future years, at the close of the 2012 model year no manufacturer is considered to be out of compliance with the program. ... Compliance with the 2012 model year standards can't be fully assessed until the end of the 2015 model year." There are a more interesting tidbits in the report, such as the fact that Fisker produced 1,415 model year 2012 vehicles, Tesla made 2,952. Remember, too, that CAFE numbers don't equal the fuel economy you see in your daily drives. In the real world, the 54.5 CAFE level will be about 40 mpg, and the average fuel economy today is around 25 mpg, so we have a ways to go, no matter how you measure it. EPA Report: Data Show Automakers on Track in meeting Greenhouse Gas Standards WASHINGTON – Today, the U.S.




















