Find or Sell Used Cars, Trucks, and SUVs in USA

2010 Toyota 4runner Sr5 V6 4wd on 2040-cars

US $22,500.00
Year:2010 Mileage:121336 Color: Silver /
 Black
Location:

17667 State Highway 13, Branson West, Missouri, United States

17667 State Highway 13, Branson West, Missouri, United States
2010 Toyota 4Runner SR5 V6 4WD, US $22,500.00, image 1
Advertising:
Fuel Type:Gasoline
Engine:4.0L V6 24V MPFI DOHC
Transmission:5-Speed Automatic
Condition: Used
VIN (Vehicle Identification Number): JTEBU5JR8A5004272
Stock Num: 8442A
Make: Toyota
Model: 4Runner SR5 V6 4WD
Year: 2010
Exterior Color: Silver
Interior Color: Black
Options:
  • 1st and 2nd row curtain head airbags
  • 4-wheel ABS Brakes
  • ABS and Driveline Traction Control
  • Automatic locking hubs
  • Auxilliary transmission cooler
  • Braking Assist
  • Bucket front seats
  • Cargo area light
  • Center Console: Full with covered storage
  • Clock: In-dash
  • Coil front spring
  • Coil rear spring
  • Compass
  • Cruise control
  • Cruise controls on steering wheel
  • Daytime running lights
  • Digital Audio Input
  • Double wishbone front suspension
  • Driver and passenger knee airbags
  • Driver Seat Head Restraint Whiplash Protection
  • Dual illuminated vanity mirrors
  • External temperature display
  • Fold forward seatback rear seats
  • Front and rear suspension stabilizer bars
  • Front fog/driving lights
  • Front Independent Suspension
  • Front reading lights
  • Front Ventilated disc brakes
  • Fuel Capacity: 24.0 gal.
  • Fuel Consumption: City: 17 mpg
  • Fuel Consumption: Highway: 22 mpg
  • Fuel Type: Regular unleaded
  • Gross vehicle weight: 6,300 lbs.
  • Head Restraint Whiplash Protection with Passenger Seat
  • Heated driver mirror
  • Heated passenger mirror
  • Independent front suspension classification
  • Instrumentation: Low fuel level
  • Interior air filtration
  • Manufacturer's 0-60mph acceleration time (seconds): 7.3 s
  • MP3 player
  • Multi-link rear suspension
  • Overall height: 71
  • Overall Length: 189.9"
  • Overall Width: 75.2"
  • Overhead console: Mini with storage
  • Passenger Airbag
  • Power remote driver mirror adjustment
  • Power remote passenger mirror adjustment
  • Power windows
  • Privacy glass: Deep
  • Rear seats center armrest
  • Rear spoiler: Lip
  • Rear Stabilizer Bar: Regular
  • Regular front stabilizer bar
  • Remote activated exterior entry lights
  • Remote power door locks
  • Remote window operation
  • Rigid axle rear suspension
  • Side airbag
  • Spare Tire Mount Location: Underbody w/crankdown
  • Speed-proportional power steering
  • Split rear bench
  • Stability control
  • Tachometer
  • Tilt and telescopic steering wheel
  • Tire Pressure Monitoring System
  • Trailer hitch
  • Trip computer
  • Variable intermittent front wipers
  • Vehicle Emissions: LEV II
Drive Type: 4WD
Number of Doors: 4 Doors
Mileage: 121336

Lady Driven, 4x4, Automatic, Air, Power Sunroof, Power Windows, Power Door Locks, Tilt/Cruise, AM/FM/CD Player, Running Boards, Tow Pkg, Alloy Wheels, Newer Tires, Keyless Entry.... Visit us at www.oakleyautoworld.com to see more information & pictures on the vehicle or call 866-316-6078 to set up an appointment to test drive!!! Remember to Like us on facebook... For more information and pictures please visit us at www.oakleyautoworld.com. Bring this ad in and recieve a full tank of gas with purchase of a vehicle. Must be present at time of purchse. No cash value.

Auto Services in Missouri

Western Tire & Auto ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Parts & Supplies, Tire Dealers
Address: 668 Jungermann Rd, Saint-Peters
Phone: (636) 928-6116

Valvoline Instant Oil Change ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Auto Oil & Lube, Automotive Tune Up Service
Address: 3801 S State Route 159, West-Alton
Phone: (618) 288-0877

St Louis Car & Credit ★★★★★

Used Car Dealers
Address: 17 Liberty Pl, West-Alton
Phone: (618) 931-2222

St Louis Auto Parts Co ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Parts & Supplies, Automobile Accessories
Address: 3400 Gravois Ave, Affton
Phone: (314) 772-1234

Specialty Automotive ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service
Address: 7850 Leavenworth Rd, Waldron
Phone: (913) 334-4631

SL Services Inc ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Brake Repair, Trailers-Repair & Service
Address: 40 & 42 Freise Industrial Dr, Moscow-Mills
Phone: (636) 356-9200

Auto blog

Toyota Land Cruiser vs Lexus LX 570 Suspension Flex Test

Thu, May 21 2020

There’s no need to explain the Toyota Land Cruiser, one of ToyotaÂ’s earliest successful products. The 2020 Toyota Land Cruiser Heritage Edition celebrates some 60 years of popularity of a vehicle that has survived the segmentÂ’s “mall wagon” phase and the rise of crossovers. Its already-sterling reputation has received an additional recent push from the rise of overlanding — an outdoor pastime that has always existed but only recently got a press agent. By comparison, the Lexus LX is a more recent development. Debuting in 1996, the LX 450 was little more than an 80-series Land Cruiser with cladding, a Lexus badge and a higher price. The amount of styling differentiation and luxury specialization has increased over the years to the point that the newest LX 570 actually seems like a completely different vehicle. In truth, the 2020 Lexus LX 570 and the 2020 Toyota Land Cruiser are both 200-series Land Cruisers under the skin. They share the same thirsty 5.7-liter V8 engine and the same frame that features a double-wishbone suspension at the front, a five-link coil spring suspension at the rear and a 112.2-inch wheelbase in the middle. The styling is strikingly different, of course, but so are the hidden details of their suspensions. The Land Cruiser employs a simple set of coil springs and shock absorbers, but with an interconnected pair of automatically disconnecting stabilizer bars called KDSS (Kinetic Dynamic Suspension System). The Lexus, on the other hand, has fixed stabilizer bars and coil springs, but its “shocks” are really hydraulic cylinders that perform height adjustments and transmit suspension movements via piping to remote electronically-adjustable damper valves mounted along the frame rails. All of the above begs a question: Which of them will go farther up my RTI ramp and, by extension, offer better suspension articulation in an authentic off-road situation? Right away, the very approach to the ramp demonstrates a huge difference and a serious issue for the LX. Its normal cruising height (there is a lower height, but this isnÂ’t that) doesnÂ’t provide enough approach clearance to attempt the ramp. The front spoiler contacts the nasty grating before the tire does. ItÂ’s a close-run thing, but from this point on, clearance gets SMALLER as the left front suspension compresses on the way up. If it's touching now, itÂ’s only going to get worse if I go forward.

Hurricane Sandy cost automakers 15,000 vehicles, may have ruined up to 200k

Wed, 07 Nov 2012

Hurricane Sandy was the largest Atlantic storm in US history, and its total economic impact is just now coming into view. According to Automotive News, Toyota, Chrysler, Nissan and Honda are set to scrap around 15,000 new vehicles ruined by the storm. Nissan alone accounts for about 40 percent of those, with 6,000 Nissan and Infiniti models deeded "un-saleable" due to damage. The company saw 56 dealerships shuttered due to the storm, but 51 of those have since reopened.
Toyota, meanwhile, had some 4,000 vehicles at its Newark port facility, and of those, 3,000 may be scrapped. An additional 825 were dealer inventory when they were ruined. Honda and Acura dealers are reportedly sending 3,440 vehicles to the salvage yard. By comparison, Chrysler weathered the storm fairly well with 825 units destroyed, while Hyundai suffered only 400 lost units and Kia scrapped around 200.
As you may recall, Fisker also suffered some losses, and Automotive News reports the manufacturer saw 320 Karma models damaged beyond repair. Ford and General Motors have yet to come up with estimates, and no automaker has commented on the full cost of replacing the vehicles.

Jaguar solution to keyless start could save lives

Mon, May 14 2018

UPDATED: An earlier version of this story indicated the Jaguar keyless start function was meant as a safety feature, when in fact, it is meant as a convenience one and will not work as described if automatic stop/start is not engaged. Today, The New York Times published an article about more than two dozen deaths related to drivers accidentally leaving their cars running, closing their garages and later succumbing to carbon monoxide that flooded their homes. The reason has been identified as "keyless start" features, or proximity entry and push-button start, where owners don't need to physically handle a key or fob to gain entry into the vehicle or start it. It is the latest, and deadliest, issue raised with this system after those related to security and simple inconvenience (for instance, leaving the car at a valet or car wash with the fob in your pocket). From my personal perspective, The New York Times had a rather harsh "evil carmakers" tone throughout the article. This is not a matter of a known faulty component, as with the GM ignition switch recall. This has as much to do with user error where people leave their car without pressing the "off" button and without noticing the engine is still running. About half of the cars in question are produced by Toyota and Lexus, brands that have offered keyless start longer than most. They are also brands with high rates of elderly owners, who seemingly made up a majority of reported deaths and injuries. One fire department in Florida even started a campaign alerting those in the area of the dangers of leaving your car running when it noticed a correlation between an increase in cars equipped with keyless start and calls related to carbon monoxide poisoning. I see several contributing issues at play, most of which go well beyond this particular issue. First is insufficient training of owners by dealers and/or owners not paying close enough attention during this training. Cars are complicated, but you should at least know how basic functions work. Second, woefully inadequate driver training in this country. Third, and with apologies to the AARP, insufficient testing of elderly drivers and/or insufficiently low standards for elderly drivers. If you don't know you have to shut the car off or cannot hear that an engine is running, perhaps you shouldn't be driving. Fourth, re-examining keyless start systems.