2005 Saturn Ion Red Line Quadcoupe 4-door 2.0l on 2040-cars
Bow, New Hampshire, United States
Engine:2.0L 122Cu. In. l4 GAS DOHC Supercharged
Vehicle Title:Clear
Body Type:Coupe
Fuel Type:GAS
For Sale By:Private Seller
Sub Model: REDLINE
Make: Saturn
Exterior Color: Black
Model: Ion
Interior Color: Black/Blue
Trim: Red Line Coupe 4-Door
Warranty: none
Drive Type: FWD
Number of Cylinders: 4
Options: Sunroof, Leather Seats, CD Player
Safety Features: Anti-Lock Brakes, Driver Airbag, Passenger Airbag
Power Options: Air Conditioning, Cruise Control, Power Locks, Power Windows
Mileage: 17,500
This vehicle is low mileage one owner and excellent condition. SMOKE FREE and CLEAN interior with no rips and very slight wear on drivers seat from getting in and out. Original equipment except for a GM stage 1 upgrade to engine with PCM flash and 7,000 RPM redline from 6,500 stock. Tires are at 50% original stock rims and tires. Rims have a couple small curb dings. The drivers side was hit in a parking lot hit and run with slight body damage rear door and fender. It has been buffed out and looks fine and hardly noticeable, but it is there and I'm not trying to hide anything. I put new brakes with drilled and slotted rotors and ceramic pads this year. I have maintenance records and gas receipts with mileage written on them and I have only ever put premium unleaded in it. I have the original window sticker from when it was on the showroom floor. It has the multi-disc factory CD player.
Saturn Ion for Sale
2004 saturn ion 2dr cpe rl quad
2004 saturn ion level 2 one owner only 58k miles non smoker clean no reserve!!!
05' saturn ion*5-speed*great mpg
No reserve 29k runs/drives like new 32+ mpg family car cruise rebuilt 05 06 04
One owner low reserve clean 2005 saturn ion 2 5 speed manual transmission(US $4,975.00)
2005 saturn ion 85k miles 4 door gas saver!!
Auto Services in New Hampshire
Tisdell Transmission ★★★★★
Precision Towing & Recovery ★★★★★
Mike`s Mast Rd Auto Inc ★★★★★
Karstoks Automotive ★★★★★
Jim`s Alignment Service ★★★★★
Greater Lowell Buick ★★★★★
Auto blog
GM recalling another 1.3-million cars over power steering woes
Mon, 31 Mar 2014When it rains, it pours. General Motors has announced yet another major recall, covering 1.3 million units in the American market over concerns that the power steering could suddenly fail. As reported by The Detroit News' David Shepardson, GM has now recalled nearly ten times as many cars as it did all of last year.
It's important to note that should this problem arise in these cars, the steering won't fail completely, however, power steering could suddenly stop functioning. Manual steering would still be possible, but as GM says, there's an increased risk of accidents, particularly at lower speeds.
Like the ignition switch recall, this latest problem covers a wide range of vehicles from Chevrolet, Saturn and Pontiac. Normally, we'd give you the full rundown in paragraph form, but the variety of models and model years means a list is just easier. So, have a look, directly from GM's press release:
GM recalling 426,000 sedans over faulty transmission shift cable
Fri, 21 Sep 2012General Motors is recalling some 426,240 sedans that may have a faulty transmission shift cable, according to a National Highway Traffic Safety Administration report this morning. The recall concerns a fault within four-speed automatic transmissions equipped on 2007-2010 Saturn Aura models, and 2008-2010 Chevrolet Malibu and Pontiac G6 models.
The report specifies that tabs on the transmission shift cable may fracture and separate. Such a fault could cause a discrepancy between the actual position of the transmission and the apparent position of the shift lever.
GM is currently working to notify owners of the vehicles in question, and dealers will check and replace shift cables free of charge. Scroll down to read the complete NHTSA report.
US database may have overstated deaths in GM ignition switch recall
Fri, Mar 14 2014The FARS analysis didn't take into account fatal accidents where the airbags weren't supposed to deploy. Earlier today, we reported that the actual death toll attributable to GM's ignition switch problem had crested the 300 mark according to new research, well up from the original reports of 12 to 13 deaths. Now, word is breaking that the US government database that informed the study that the report was based on may have significantly overstated the correlation between the study and the GM recall. The initial study was conducted by Friedman Research on behalf of the Center for Auto Safety, and used something called the US Fatality Analysis Reporting System. To recap, the study claimed that over a 10-year period, 303 people were killed in Chevrolet Cobalt and Saturn Ion coupes and sedans when their airbags failed to deploy. These undeployed airbags were then linked to GM's ignition switch recall, which as we've explained before, can turn the ignition out of the "run" position and into the "off" or "accessory" position, disabling the airbags in the process. Now, according to a report from The Detroit News, which cites research from the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety and the National Study Center for Trauma and EMS at the University of Maryland, the FARS analysis didn't take into account fatal accidents in conditions where the airbags weren't supposed to deploy (which isn't to say crashes and deaths weren't caused by loss of control from the ignition switching off in the GM vehicles). According to the report, this was a significant number of the cases. There is another potential problem, too. According to that same report, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration uses both FARS and another database on fatalities, called the National Automotive Sampling System/Crashworthiness Data System (NASS/CDS). Where FARS uses what the DetNews calls "not always reliable" police data to record vehicular deaths within 30 days of a crash, NASS/CDS relies on what's known as a probability sample. It collects data on 5,000 crashes each year – including some found in the FARS database – to calculate a probability figure. According to a 2009 IIHS study, "Among crashes common to both databases, NASS/CDS reported deployments for 45 percent of front occupant deaths for which FARS had coded nondeployments." In plain English, FARS doesn't provide a reliable count airbag deployments.