Find or Sell Used Cars, Trucks, and SUVs in USA

2006 Saturn Vue 4-door 2.2l Fwd Wow!! Great Shape One Owner Runs Great Looks Gr8 on 2040-cars

Year:2006 Mileage:124000
Location:

Bridgeport, Connecticut, United States

Bridgeport, Connecticut, United States
Advertising:

 

Report Summary

  • Class: CUV - Entry Level
  • Engine: 2.2L I4 MPI
  • Country of Assembly: United States
  • Vehicle Age: 7 year(s)
  • Calculated Owners: 1
  • VIN: 5GZCZ33D46S837431
  • Year : 2006
  • Make : Saturn
  • Model: VUE
  • Style/Body: SUV 4D

This Vehicle's AutoCheck Score

The AutoCheck Score is a summary of your vehicle's history. It lets you compare similar vehicles with ease.
About the AutoCheck Score

This vehicle qualifies for Buyback Protection

buyback

Safeguard your investment with AutoCheck Buyback Protection. It reduces the risk in buying a used vehicle.
About Buyback Protection

AccidentCheck

Reported accidents: 1

Title and ProblemCheck

Your vehicle checks out!

OdometerCheck

Your vehicle checks out!

Last Reported Odometer: 124,063

Vehicle Use and EventCheck

Specific vehicle use(s) or events reported


On Dec-13-13 at 15:17:24 PST, seller added the following information:

   great tires, good brakes, starts well, great heat, radio, full power, twin cam, auto, clean, comfy, safe and sound. runs great.     please see all photos, I took every good and bad shot.     pay simply what you all want. this is an eBay sale, bid... buy... you own it. not what I ask, what you think is right ~!~!    come by, say hi, shake hands and drive it home.     car, keys, title, bill of sale.... you are all set.    drive it home or anywhere with no worries.      j. bettes,   800 Clinton ave,   Bridgeport,   CT   06604   203.258.3356

Auto Services in Connecticut

Warburtons Automobile Repair ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service
Address: 913 Main St, Oneco
Phone: (401) 828-6574

Vail Buick GMC ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, New Car Dealers, Used Car Dealers
Address: 606 Bedford Rd, Ridgefield
Phone: (914) 666-7537

Saf-T Auto Ctr ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Brake Repair, Gas Stations
Address: 986 S Main St, Cheshire
Phone: (203) 271-0899

Ren Sales & Svc ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service
Address: 98 Linwood Ave, North-Grosvenordale
Phone: (508) 234-9651

Pop`s Exhaust ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Parts & Supplies, Mufflers & Exhaust Systems
Address: 53 Slater St, Coventry
Phone: (860) 645-6095

Paul`s Automotive ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Body Repairing & Painting, Automobile Parts & Supplies
Address: 804 Stanley St, New-Britain
Phone: (860) 223-3324

Auto blog

GM ignition switch trial cleared to begin on January 11

Sat, Jan 2 2016

US District Judge Jesse Furman didn't accept General Motor's attempt to dismiss a civil trial over the automaker's faulty ignition switches, and set a January 11 start date for the case to begin, according to Reuters. The judge found that plaintiff Robert Scheuer had the evidence to proceed with the case. Scheuer was injured in an accident in his 2003 Saturn Ion in 2014 when another vehicle forced him off the road, and he crashed into some trees. The airbag didn't deploy, and Scheuer alleged this was the result of the faulty ignition switch. According to Reuters, Scheuer's trial is one of six bellwether cases over GM's ignition switch problem in the coming year. Juries' decisions in these lawsuits should provide an example of how similar trials could end, and these results would help The General decide whether to settle other pending cases or to keep fighting them. The ignition switch fiasco has already cost GM billions. For example, the company's compensation program offered $594.5 million in 399 cases of people killed or injured by the defective parts. Anyone that accepted this money agreed not to sue GM for the problem later. The company also came to a $900 million criminal settlement with the US government and paid $575 million in civil resolutions in September.

GM's got 107 problems and NHTSA's No. 1

Thu, Mar 6 2014

General Motors' problems with its recall of roughly 1.6-million vehicles continue to mount. Now that it has emerged that GM knew about the problem since at least 2004 but waited to recall vehicles until February 2014, regulators at the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration have begun a much deeper investigation. NHTSA has sent a 27-page survey to GM that includes 107 questions about the timeline of what led up to the recall, and it has until April 3 to reply. This isn't a simple, multiple-choice test. Automotive News believes that hundreds of pages could be required to answer some of the queries. NHTSA says that it is still investigating GM's response to the recall. "We are a data-driven organization, and we will take whatever action is appropriate based on where our findings lead us," said NHTSA in a statement on its website. If found liable, the automaker could face a fine as high as $35 million and even possible criminal charges, according to Bloomberg. NHTSA's questions include a detailed explanation of GM's examination process; how it will improve the process; why a planned redesign of the cars' key in 2005 wasn't implemented; and specific data on each complaint it received. According to Bloomberg, NHTSA also has records that show the company had a meeting with regulators to discuss the airbag failure in a Chevrolet Cobalt in 2007. New GM CEO Mary Barra has also hired an outside law firm to conduct an independent investigation about what happened. It will include questioning company employees who were involved with the process from the start. The recall stems from faulty ignition switches that shut off the car while driving, and if it occurs the airbags deactivate. Thirteen deaths and 23 crashes have been caused by the problem, according to Bloomberg. If you would like to peruse NHTSA's entire questionnaire for GM, it can be viewed here. News Source: Automotive News – sub. req., National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, BloombergImage Credit: Carlos Osorio / AP / dapd Government/Legal Recalls GM Pontiac Saturn Safety pontiac solstice saturn ion saturn sky pontiac g5

Woman Cleared In Fatal Car Wreck After GM Letter

Tue, Nov 25 2014

A Texas judge cleared a woman Monday for a car accident that killed her fiance in 2004, after General Motors acknowledged that her car would have been among millions being recalled for a problem that may have contributed to the death. Candice Anderson was driving a 2004 Saturn Ion when it suddenly veered off a road about 60 miles east of Dallas and slammed into a tree. Anderson, then 21, was severely injured when the car's air bags failed to deploy. Her 25-year-old fiance, Gene Erikson, who was a passenger, was killed. She later pleaded guilty to charges stemming from the wreck. But during a hearing Monday, State District Judge Teresa Drum expunged the conviction from her record, according to officials in the Van Zandt County court andAnderson's attorney, Bob Hilliard. In a letter given to the court ahead of the hearing, an attorney for the automaker confirmed that Anderson's Saturn would have been among 2.6 million GM vehicles recalled in February to address ignition switches that can slip out of the "run" position, causing the engines to stall and disabling power steering, brakes and air bags. Anderson's crash "is one in which the recall condition may have caused or contributed to the frontal air bag non-deployment in the accident," attorney Richard C. Godfrey wrote. Hilliard provided a copy of the letter to The Associated Press, and Godfrey confirmed its contents Monday. Anderson was initially charged with criminally negligent homicide because there was no clear explanation at the time why the wreck occurred, according to court documents from the case. She pleaded guilty to a letter charge in 2006, and was sentenced to five years' probation. She also was ordered to perform 260 hours of community service, pay court costs and cover the costs of Erikson's funeral. "GM knew this defect caused this death, yet instead of telling the truth watched silently as Candice was found guilty of involuntary manslaughter," Hilliard said Monday. "It took 10 years for GM to find its voice." In a separate statement issued by the company, GM said it "cooperated fully by providing technical information that was requested to make a decision in this matter." The carmaker also said the issue in Anderson's case was for local law enforcement and courts to consider. "That's why we took a neutral position on Ms. Anderson's case," the company's statement said. "It was appropriate for the court to determine the legal status of Ms.