2014 Nissan Versa 1.6 Sv on 2040-cars
629 Jake Alexander Blvd S, Salisbury, North Carolina, United States
Engine:1.6L I4 16V MPFI DOHC
Transmission:Automatic CVT
VIN (Vehicle Identification Number): 3N1CN7AP7EL826604
Stock Num: 7704
Make: Nissan
Model: Versa 1.6 SV
Year: 2014
Exterior Color: Blue Onyx
Interior Color: Charcoal
Options: Drive Type: FWD
Number of Doors: 4 Doors
Mileage: 1
Head Airbag, [K01] CONVENIENCE PACKAGE, [S92] FOG LIGHTS, [N92] ILLUMINATED KICK PLATES, [B92] SPLASH GUARDS. SV trim, Blue Onyx exterior and Charcoal interior. EPA 40 MPG Hwy/31 MPG City! CLICK ME!======KEY FEATURES INCLUDE: Rear Spoiler, Remote Trunk Release, Keyless Entry, Child Safety Locks, Electronic Stability Control. ======OPTION PACKAGES: CONVENIENCE PACKAGE: foldable assist grips (1 front passenger and 2 rear), and tricot fabric headliner, Bluetooth Hands-Free Phone System, Steering Wheel-Mounted Audio Controls, Wheels: 15 Alloy, Radio: AM/FM w/MP3/iPod Control, Speed Sensitive Volume (SSV) and Radio Data System (RDS), Front Passe, FOG LIGHTS, CARPETED FLOOR & TRUNK MATS (5-PIECE), SPLASH GUARDS, ILLUMINATED KICK PLATES. SV with Blue Onyx exterior and Charcoal interior features a 4 Cylinder Engine with 109 HP at 6000 RPM*. ======EXPERTS CONCLUDE: Great Gas Mileage: 40 MPG Hwy. ======MORE ABOUT US: Visit us Today! Dealer Award Winner for outstanding sales and service in the Charlotte region. We are one of North Carolina's Largest Certified Nissan Dealers. Our team is professional, offers you a no-pressure environment and operates with the quality you expect. Price includes all applicable rebates in lieu of special NMAC finance rates and may be based on purchaser's zip code at the time of purchase. Prices do not include taxes, tag, and $589 administrative fee. Horsepower calculations based on trim engine configuration. Fuel economy calculations based on original manufacturer data for trim engine configuration. Please confirm the accuracy of the included equipment by calling us prior to purchase.
Nissan Versa for Sale
2014 nissan versa note sv(US $17,307.00)
2014 nissan versa note sv(US $17,498.00)
2014 nissan versa note sv(US $16,300.00)
2014 nissan versa 1.6 sv(US $15,553.00)
2012 nissan versa 1.6 s
2011 nissan versa(US $13,000.00)
Auto Services in North Carolina
Wood Tire & Alignment ★★★★★
Wilhelm`s ★★★★★
Wilcox Auto Sales ★★★★★
Town & Country Radiator ★★★★★
The Transmission Shop ★★★★★
The Auto Finders ★★★★★
Auto blog
MotorWeek checks out two sides of the '90s Japanese car scene
Sat, Feb 6 2016MotorWeek's Retro Reviews let you feel nostalgic about a huge range of classic cars, and the latest two releases offer a look at two very different sides of the Japanese car market in the 1990s. The video above shows off tuned examples of the Mazda RX-7 and Nissan 300ZX. Check out the clip below to remember the 1997 Honda CR-V, if you want to reminisce about something a little more utilitarian. The RX-7 and 300ZX were among the era's best Japanese sports cars, and these examples' suspension and engine overhauls gave them an extra boost. Peter Farrel Supercars tunes the Mazda, and the vibrant yellow paint and body kit make it look ready for an episode of Initial D. The updated powertrain stands up to the mean styling and gets the RX-7 to 60 miles per hour in 4.5 seconds. The Stillen 300ZX GTZ sports a giant wing, and new turbos take the output to 465 hp. It sprints to 60 in 4.9 seconds. The CR-V sits on the opposite end of the automotive spectrum as the tuned RX-7 and 300ZX, but it's even more important in a historical sense. The Honda (along with the Toyota RAV4 and others) was among the progenitors of today's mega-popular compact crossovers. These early examples set the foundation for offering buyers a utilitarian vehicle in a comfortable package with good fuel economy at an affordable price. The CR-V had some quirky charm, too, like the removable picnic table hidden in the cargo floor. This content is hosted by a third party. To view it, please update your privacy preferences. Manage Settings.
Race Recap: 2014 24 Hours of Le Mans defines 'endurance'
Mon, 16 Jun 2014Commenting on the rush of events that rocked beginning and end of the 24 Hours of Le Mans, Paul Truswell of Radio Le Mans said "the race is about the ability to endure, not just the ability of drivers to do what they do for a long time." The entire race machine, all the way down to the pit boards and radios, has to survive the stress and abuse of the entire day. This was the race to prove those words.
There were two Toyotas, two Porsches and three Audis, five of the seven led the race at some point, six of the seven ran in the top three. Toyota will be hugely disappointed that it didn't win when its car and drivers were so, so strong, but they gave Audi the kind of scare we haven't seen since the best of Peugeot's days, and Toyota did a better job of it even in the loss. Porsche blew away everyone's expectations, falling 3.5 hours short of a fairy tale ending that would have made Disney cry.
But Le Mans doesn't really do fairy tales. Well, not that fairy tale. Audi's Twitter handle during the event was #welcomechallenges. As usual, Le Mans answered for the entire field.
Carmakers ask Trump to revisit fuel efficiency rules
Mon, Feb 13 2017Car companies operating in the US are required to meet stringent fuel efficiency standards (a fleet average of 54.5MPG) through 2025, but they're hoping to loosen things now that President Trump is in town. Leaders from Fiat Chrysler, Ford, GM, Honda, Hyundai, Nissan, Toyota and VW have sent a letter to Trump asking him to rethink the Obama administration's choice to lock in efficiency guidelines for the next several years. The car makers want to revisit the midterm review for the 2025 commitment in hopes of loosening the demands. They claim that the tougher requirements raise costs, don't match public buying habits and will supposedly put "as many a million" jobs up in the air. The Trump administration hasn't specifically responded to the letter, although Environmental Protection Agency nominee Scott Pruitt had said he would return to the Obama-era decision. The automakers' argument doesn't entirely hold up. While the EPA did estimate that the US would fall short of efficiency goals due to a shift toward SUVs and trucks, the job claims are questionable. Why would making more fuel efficient vehicles necessarily cost jobs instead of pushing companies to do better? As it is, even a successful attempt to loosen guidelines may only have a limited effect. All of the brands mentioned here are pushing for greater mainstream adoption of electric vehicles within the next few years -- they may meet the Obama administration's expectations just by shifting more drivers away from gas power. This article by Jon Fingas originally appeared on Engadget, your guide to this connected life. Related Video: News Source: ReutersImage Credit: Daniel Acker/Bloomberg via Getty Images Government/Legal Green Chrysler Fiat GM Honda Hyundai Nissan Toyota Volkswagen Fuel Efficiency CAFE standards Trump











