Find or Sell Used Cars, Trucks, and SUVs in USA

2013 Sv New Turbo 1.6l I4 16v Awd Suv Premium on 2040-cars

US $15,995.00
Year:2013 Mileage:918 Color: Blue /
 Black
Location:

Brooklyn, New York, United States

Brooklyn, New York, United States
Advertising:
Body Type:SUV
Vehicle Title:Salvage
Fuel Type:Gasoline
For Sale By:Dealer
VIN: JN8AF5MV6DT212657 Year: 2013
Number of Cylinders: 4
Make: Nissan
Model: Juke
Warranty: No
Drive Type: AWD
Mileage: 918
Sub Model: SV
Exterior Color: Blue
Number of Doors: 4 Doors
Interior Color: Black
Condition: Used: A vehicle is considered used if it has been registered and issued a title. Used vehicles have had at least one previous owner. The condition of the exterior, interior and engine can vary depending on the vehicle's history. See the seller's listing for full details and description of any imperfections. ... 

Auto Services in New York

Wayne`s Auto Repair ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service
Address: 101 Central Ave, Van-Buren-Point
Phone: (716) 363-6499

Vk Auto Repair ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service
Address: 1000 Jericho Tpke, Glenwood-Landing
Phone: (929) 224-0634

Village Auto Body Works Inc ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Body Repairing & Painting, Wheel Alignment-Frame & Axle Servicing-Automotive
Address: 248 Winthrop Ave, Garden-City
Phone: (516) 997-5583

TOWING BROOKLYN TODAY.COM ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Towing, Locks & Locksmiths
Address: 2025 Flatbush Ave, Rochdale-Village
Phone: (646) 470-4869

Total Performance Incorporated ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Parts & Supplies, Auto Transmission
Address: 18 Ramapo Valley Rd, Nanuet
Phone: (201) 529-4353

Tom & Arties Automotive Repair ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Body Repairing & Painting
Address: 211 Veterans Rd W, Staten-Island
Phone: (718) 967-7817

Auto blog

West Coast labor dispute hampers Japanese automakers' US plants

Wed, Feb 18 2015

The ongoing labor dispute between the International Longshore and Warehouse Union and port owners along the West Coast is starting to affect more Japanese automakers building vehicles in the US. The issue already forced Honda and Subaru to take the expensive option of airlifting some parts into the US weeks ago, and according to USA Today, Toyota and Nissan have begun doing so, as well. The choice hasn't been cheap, though, and Subaru's chief financial officer estimated that the decision cost around $60 million more per month than sending components by cargo ship. The effects continue to radiate, according to USA Today, and shortages of some models are possible. Honda is slowing production at its factories in Ohio, Indiana and Canada because the automaker doesn't have enough transmissions and electronics for some vehicles. Toyota already cut back on overtime at some factories. Nissan has only seen a small effect from the issue, though, because of its local suppliers. Dock workers and port owners have been negotiating on a new contract since last year, and the union has organized work slowdowns in response. According to USA Today, the automakers could move shipments to Canada or Mexico, but it would take longer for parts to arrive. News Source: USA TodayImage Credit: Mark Ralston / AFP / Getty Images Earnings/Financials Plants/Manufacturing UAW/Unions Honda Nissan Subaru Toyota shipping port labor dispute

Nissan Juke Nismo RS reveal confirmed by LA Auto Show

Thu, 10 Oct 2013

With the LA Auto Show a little more than a month away, we're getting a good idea of which cars we'll be seeing there. Show organizers have issued a press release that names numerous debuts we've heard about already, and one that caught our eye as brand new: the Nissan Juke Nismo RS.
We first heard about the Juke Nismo RS last year, and reported news of track-focused handling upgrades as well as a boost in power to the tune of 270 horsepower - an increase of 73 hp over a standard Juke. There is still no definitive word as to what else the will come with the Nismo RS package.
In addition to the Juke, we hear that the Nismo brand will also help unveil a new concept vehicle for Nissan on the LA stage.

At meeting with automakers, Trump launches new attack on NAFTA

Fri, May 11 2018

WASHINGTON — Ten American and foreign automakers went to the White House on Friday to push for a weakening of U.S. fuel efficiency standards through 2025, while President Donald Trump used the occasion to launch a fresh attack on the North American Free Trade Agreement that has benefited the companies. A draft proposal circulated by the U.S. Transportation Department would freeze fuel efficiency requirements at 2020 levels through 2026, rather than allowing them to increase as previously planned. Trump's administration is expected to formally unveil the proposal later this month or in June. "We're working on CAFE standards, environmental controls," Trump told reporters at the top of the meeting, referring to the Corporate Average Fuel Economy standards for cars and light trucks in the United States. Trump said he wants automakers to build more vehicles in the United States and export more vehicles. But much of the hour-long meeting focused on NAFTA. Trump blasted the pact involving the United States, Canada and Mexico as "terrible" and noted that negotiations to make changes sought by his administration were ongoing. "NAFTA has been a horrible, horrible disaster for this country and we'll see if we can make it reasonable," Trump said. Automakers have called NAFTA a success, allowing them to integrate production throughout North America and make production competitive with Asia and Europe, and have noted the increase in auto production over the past two decades with the deal in place. They have warned that changing NAFTA too much could prompt some companies to move production out of the United States. The chief executives of General Motors Co, Ford Motor Co, Fiat Chrysler, along with senior U.S. executives from Toyota Motor Corp, Volkswagen AG, Hyundai Motor Co, Nissan Motor Co, Honda Motor Co , BMW AG and Daimler AG met with Trump, as did the chief executives of two auto trade groups. Major automakers reiterated this week they do not support freezing fuel efficiency requirements but said they want new flexibility and rule changes to address lower gasoline prices and the shift in U.S. consumer preferences to bigger, less fuel-efficient vehicles.