Find or Sell Used Cars, Trucks, and SUVs in USA

2008 Nissan Quest Base Mini Passenger Van 4-door 3.5l on 2040-cars

Year:2008 Mileage:95021 Color: Gray /
 Gray
Location:

Dracut, Massachusetts, United States

Dracut, Massachusetts, United States
2008 Nissan Quest Base Mini Passenger Van 4-Door 3.5L, image 1
Advertising:
Transmission:Automatic
Engine:3.5L 3498CC V6 GAS DOHC Naturally Aspirated
Vehicle Title:Clear
Body Type:Mini Passenger Van
Fuel Type:GAS
For Sale By:Private Seller
VIN: 5N1BV28U38N108460 Year: 2008
Mileage: 95,021
Make: Nissan
Exterior Color: Gray
Model: Quest
Interior Color: Gray
Trim: Base Mini Passenger Van 4-Door
Drive Type: FWD
Options: Sunroof, Cassette Player, 4-Wheel Drive, Leather Seats, CD Player, Convertible
Number of Cylinders: 6
Safety Features: Anti-Lock Brakes, Driver Airbag, Passenger Airbag, Side Airbags
Power Options: Air Conditioning, Cruise Control, Power Locks, Power Windows, Power Seats
Condition: Used: A vehicle is considered used if it has been registered and issued a title. Used vehicles have had at least one previous owner. The condition of the exterior, interior and engine can vary depending on the vehicle's history. See the seller's listing for full details and description of any imperfections. ... 

Nissan Quest 3.5 S


Cash Price for quick sale: $11,300

Body Style: Minivan


Transmission: Automatic

Make: Nissan

Exterior Color: Gray

Model: Quest

Year: 2008

Mileage: 99,021

Engine: V6


CD Player - A/C

Power Everything

Clean Title - Runs %100

YOU HAVE 5 BUSINESS DAYS TO PIC UP THE CAR OR YOU WILL BE CHARGED A 35 DOLLAR STORAGE FEE 
PER DAY

CALL ME , JOE 978 985 4324
  • Location: Lowell, MA
  • Deposit of US $500.00 within 24 hours of auction close. Immediate deposit required for Buy It Now. Full payment required within 3 BUSINESS DAYS  of auction close!!!
  • CALL ME JOE 978-985-4324


 

Auto Services in Massachusetts

Tremont Auto Body ★★★★★

Automobile Body Repairing & Painting
Address: 90 Tremont St, Waltham
Phone: (617) 387-2150

Toy Town Auto Salvage ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Parts & Supplies, Automobile Accessories
Address: 800 Spring St, Ashby
Phone: (978) 297-0350

Town Fair Tire ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Tire Dealers, Wheels-Aligning & Balancing
Address: 121 Endicott St, Glendale
Phone: (978) 777-8350

Teta`s Automotive ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automotive Tune Up Service
Address: 640 Springfield St, Southampton
Phone: (413) 592-9546

T N T Repairs ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service
Address: 59 Wilson St, Paxton
Phone: (508) 885-2193

Salem Auto Body Company ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Body Repairing & Painting, Automobile Body Shop Equipment & Supplies
Address: 25 Boston St, Glendale
Phone: (978) 744-3927

Auto blog

Nissan Juke-R pitted against Bugatti Veyron in brilliantly odd drag race

Mon, 10 Jun 2013

The Nissan Juke-R must've been a tough car to build a business case for, yet the madcap little crossover with the heart of a GT-R is now a production reality. Admittedly, we should probably assign some quotes around "production," since the vehicle is being built on a one-by-one on-demand basis at extraordinary cost - at an estimated price of well over $600,000, it has little in common with the already bonkers everyday Juke. We're just happy it exists at all.
With 545 horsepower, we also didn't figure it needed more power. But that apparently hasn't stopped the tuning community, which probably only had to adapt performance adders designed for the GT-R to the mechanically similar CUV. Thus, we end up with this mile-long drag race, which pits a Bugatti Veyron against a Juke-R prepared by an outfit called Shpilli Villi Engineering with a claimed 700 horsepower. That's still well down on horsepower versus the legendary quad-turbo supercar, but the much smaller Nissan also figures to be a lot lighter while boasting similar all-wheel-drive traction. We don't have much more information to go on other than this video, and it doesn't appear that both drivers necessarily got their best runs in, but it certainly makes for jaw-dropping watching. Check it out by scrolling below.

Poor headlights cause 40 cars to miss IIHS Top Safety Pick rating

Mon, Aug 6 2018

Over the past few months, we've noticed a number of cars and SUVs that have come incredibly close to earning one of the IIHS's highest accolades, the Top Safety Pick rating. They have great crash test scores and solid automatic emergency braking and forward collision warning systems. What trips them up is headlights. That got us wondering, how many vehicles are there that are coming up short because they don't have headlights that meet the organization's criteria for an "Acceptable" or "Good" rating. This is a revision made after 2017, a year in which headlights weren't factored in for this specific award. This is also why why some vehicles, such as the Ford F-150, might have had the award last year, but have lost it for this year. We reached out to someone at IIHS to find out. He responded with the following car models. Depending on how you count, a whopping 40 models crash well enough to receive the rating, but don't get it because their headlights are either "Poor" or "Marginal." We say depending on how you count because the IIHS actual counts truck body styles differently, and the Infiniti Q70 is a special case. Apparently the version of the Q70 that has good headlights doesn't have adequate forward collision prevention technology. And the one that has good forward collision tech doesn't have good enough headlights. We've provided the entire list of vehicles below in alphabetical order. Interestingly, it seems the Volkswagen Group is having the most difficulty providing good headlights with its otherwise safe cars. It had the most models on the list at 9 split between Audi and Volkswagen. GM is next in line with 7 models. It is worth noting again that though these vehicles have subpar headlights and don't quite earn Top Safety Pick awards, that doesn't mean they're unsafe. They all score well enough in crash testing and forward collision prevention that they would get the coveted award if the lights were better.

IIHS: High numbers of drivers treat partially automated cars as fully self-driving

Tue, Oct 11 2022

WASHINGTON — Drivers using advanced driver assistance systems like Tesla Autopilot or General Motors Super Cruise often treat their vehicles as fully self-driving despite warnings, a new study has found. The Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS), an industry funded group that prods automakers to make safer vehicles, said on Tuesday a survey found regular users of Super Cruise, Nissan/Infiniti ProPILOT Assist and Tesla Autopilot "said they were more likely to perform non-driving-related activities like eating or texting while using their partial automation systems than while driving unassisted." The IIHS study of 600 active users found 53% of Super Cruise, 42% of Autopilot and 12% of ProPILOT Assist owners "said that they were comfortable treating their vehicles as fully self-driving." About 40% of users of Autopilot and Super Cruise — two systems with lockout features for failing to pay attention — reported systems had at some point switched off while they were driving and would not reactivate. "The big-picture message here is that the early adopters of these systems still have a poor understanding of the technologyÂ’s limits," said IIHS President David Harkey. The study comes as the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) is scrutinizing Autopilot crashes. Since 2016, the NHTSA has opened 37 special investigations involving 18 deaths in crashes involving Tesla vehicles and where systems like Autopilot were suspected of use. Tesla did not respond to requests for comment. Tesla says Autopilot does not make vehicles autonomous and is intended for use with a fully attentive driver who is prepared to take over. GM, which in August said owners could use Super Cruise on 400,000 miles (643,740 km) of North American roads and plans to offer Super Cruise on 22 models by the end of 2023, did not immediately comment. IIHS said advertisements for Super Cruise focus on hands-free capabilities while Autopilot evokes the name used in passenger airplanes and "implies TeslaÂ’s system is more capable than it really is." IIHS in contrast noted ProPILOT Assist "suggests that itÂ’s an assistance feature, rather than a replacement for the driver." NHTSA and automakers say none of the systems make vehicles autonomous. Nissan said its name "is clearly communicating ProPILOT Assist as a system to aid the driver, and it requires hands-on operation.