Find or Sell Used Cars, Trucks, and SUVs in USA

1999 Mercury Grand Marquis Ls Sedan 4-door 4.6l on 2040-cars

Year:1999 Mileage:223000 Color: Green /
 Tan
Location:

Manchester, Tennessee, United States

Manchester, Tennessee, United States
Advertising:
Transmission:Automatic
Body Type:Sedan
Vehicle Title:Rebuilt, Rebuildable & Reconstructed
Engine:4.6L 281Cu. In. V8 GAS SOHC Naturally Aspirated
Fuel Type:GAS
For Sale By:Private Seller
VIN: 2mefm75w7xx604434 Year: 1999
Make: Mercury
Model: Grand Marquis
Warranty: Vehicle does NOT have an existing warranty
Trim: LS Sedan 4-Door
Options: Cassette Player, Leather Seats
Drive Type: RWD
Safety Features: Anti-Lock Brakes, Driver Airbag, Passenger Airbag
Mileage: 223,000
Power Options: Air Conditioning, Cruise Control, Power Locks, Power Windows, Power Seats
Exterior Color: Green
Interior Color: Tan
Number of Cylinders: 8
Number of Doors: 4
Condition: UsedA vehicle is considered used if it has been registered and issued a title. Used vehicles have had at least one previous owner. The condition of the exterior, interior and engine can vary depending on the vehicle's history. See the seller's listing for full details and description of any imperfections.Seller Notes:"THIS IS A CORPORATE VEHICLE USED FOR EXECUTIVE AND CLIENTS PICK/DROP-OFFS AT NASHVILLE,ATLANTA,KNOXVILLE AIRPORTS. ALWAYS HAD PROFESSIONAL DRIVER. THERE IS NO RUST,ENGINE RUNS AS IT SHOULD,DOES NOT SMOKE,TRANSMISSION SHIFTS AS IT SHOULD (60K ON THIS ONE).YOU WILL NEED A CALLICCONVERTER.CLEAR COAT PEELING IN SOME AREAS,CLEAN INSIDE AND OUTSIDE.NEVER SMOKED IN. STILL A VERY QUIET AND SMOOTH RIDE.ANY QUESTIONS CALL ROBERT @ 423 572 2215.THERE IS NO WARRANTY."

THE FRONT END WAS COMPLETELY REPLACED AT 69K MILES THE FRAME WAS NOT DAMAGED AT ALL. THIS VEHICLE IS  A VERY GOOD CAR STILL IT'S JUST TIME TO PART WAYS FOR MY CUSTOMERS SAKE. I STILL USE IT AS PERSONNAL CAR AND MY SON WHO'S IN COLLEGE USES IT ALSO. IT WILL MAKE YOU A GREAT CAR FOR SCHOOL A SECOND CAR.

I WOULD GO ANYWHERE IN THIS CAR WITH OUT HESITATION.NY/FL I MEAN ANYWHERE.
ANY QUESTIONS PLEASE CALL ROBERT.

Auto Services in Tennessee

Watson Auto Sales East Inc ★★★★★

Used Car Dealers
Address: 3328 N Main St, Crossville
Phone: (931) 787-1779

Stephen`s Tire & Auto Repair ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Tire Dealers
Address: 1730 Fairview Blvd, Bon-Aqua
Phone: (615) 799-2886

Southern Cross Towing ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automotive Roadside Service, Trailers-Repair & Service
Address: 159 East Bockman Way, Doyle
Phone: (866) 421-8784

Seymour Muffler & Brake ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Parts & Supplies, Mufflers & Exhaust Systems
Address: 12227 Chapman Hwy, Seymour
Phone: (865) 573-0400

S And J Complete Auto Services ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Tire Dealers
Address: 624 Murfreesboro Pike, Bellevue
Phone: (615) 331-1021

Rods Tire and Auto Center ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Tire Dealers
Address: 47 Perimeter Pl, Medina
Phone: (731) 783-3664

Auto blog

Question of the Day: Most degraded car name?

Fri, May 27 2016

When Ford came up with a not-so-sporty version of the Pinto and slapped Mustang badges on it in 1974, that was a low point for the Mustang name. When Chrysler applied the venerable Town & Country name on perfectly functional but unglamorous minivans, it saddened many of us. But perhaps the biggest demotion for a once-proud model came when, in 1988, General Motors imported a misery-enhancing Daewoo from Korea and called it the Pontiac LeMans. The original Pontiac LeMans was a great-looking midsize car with fairly advanced (for the time) suspension design and engine options including potent V8s and a screaming overhead-cam straight-six. The Daewoo-based Pontiac LeMans was a cramped, shoddy hooptie that served only to ruin the LeMans name forever, while stealing sales from the Suzuki-based Chevrolet Sprint. Sure, using the once-respected Monterey name on the Mercurized Ford Freestar was bad, but Mercury didn't have long to live at that point. I say the downward spiral of the LeMans name was the most agonizing in automotive history. What do you think? Related Video: This content is hosted by a third party. To view it, please update your privacy preferences. Manage Settings. Auto News Ford Mercury Pontiac Automotive History Classics questions ford pinto names

Ford recalling 450,000 Fusion, Mercury Milan sedans

Tue, Nov 24 2015

Ford has announced a pair of recalls, and both are critical safety issues. The exponentially larger of the two recall campaigns affects over 450,000 Ford Fusion and Mercury Milan sedans manufactured at the Hermosillo plant between July 21, 2008, and March 4, 2011. The canister purge valve in the fuel tank could malfunction and could cause the top of the tank to crack and leak fuel. That could cause a fire, although Ford "is not aware of any accidents, injuries or fires" resulting from the issue. Affected vehicles will have their ECU software updated and their fuel tanks inspected for potential replacement. The company estimates there are 411,205 affected units in the United States (and its federalized territories), plus another 33,605 in Canada, and 7,055 in Mexico. The second recall affects 13 F-650 trucks. The column shifter's park position mechanism may fracture and let the truck roll away unexpectedly. Those 2016 models built in Ohio between July 29 and September 3, 2015 are all located in the US. Fixing the problem will require replacing the steering column and reconfiguring the instrument panel. FORD ISSUES TWO SAFETY RECALLS IN NORTH AMERICA DEARBORN, Mich., Nov. 23, 2015 – Ford Motor Company is issuing two safety recalls in North America. Ford is not aware of any accidents, injuries or fires related to these conditions. Details are as follows: Ford issues safety recall for certain 2010-2011 Ford Fusion and Mercury Milan vehicles in North America for potential fuel tank issue Ford Motor Company is issuing a safety recall for approximately 450,000 2010-2011 Ford Fusion and Mercury Milan vehicles for a potential issue with the fuel tank. Some of these vehicles might have a canister purge valve that does not work properly, causing internal pressure changes inside the fuel tank. Repeated pressure changes inside the tank could result in a crack on the top of the tank, possibly allowing fuel to leak. A fuel leak in the presence of an ignition source can lead to a fire. Ford is not aware of any accidents, injuries or fires related to this condition. Affected vehicles include certain 2010-2011 Ford Fusion and Mercury Milan vehicles built at Hermosillo Assembly Plant from July 21, 2008 through March 4, 2011. There are a total of approximately 451,865 vehicles that might be affected in North America, including 411,205 vehicles in the United States and federalized territories, 33,605 in Canada and 7,055 in Mexico.

The 1965 Ford Mustang could have looked a lot different

Fri, May 8 2020

The 1965 Ford Mustang is unquestionably an automotive design icon, and nearly every generation of Mustang has some connection to that original car. Because it's such a universally-known vehicle, we were amazed to see all the different designs that were being considered. Head of Ford's archives Ted Ryan recently shared photos of design proposals for the original Mustang on Twitter that he and Jamie Myler found, and we reached out to them to find out more. As Ryan initially noted, the photos were taken on August 19, 1962, and they are proposals for the Ford Mustang. Apparently Ford had committed to doing a Falcon-based youth-oriented car at this point, and it did have plans to launch the car in 1964 for the 1965 model year. But after having little success with early design proposals, the company asked all of its design studios — the Advanced Studio, Lincoln-Mercury Studio and Ford Studio — to submit proposals. With only about two years before the planned launch, Ford was understandably short on time, and it's believed that the studios only had a month to create and present these designs. Lincoln-Mercury design proposal View 8 Photos The majority of the designs, a total of five, came from the Advanced Studio, and part of this was because they already had a couple of concept designs in reserve it could present. Two other models representing three design possibilities came from Lincoln-Mercury, and just one model with two options came from Ford. The Advanced Studio proposals are shown in the gallery at the very top of this article, and the Lincoln-Mercury and Ford proposals are in the gallery directly above this paragraph. The Advanced Studio's most radical design is the one that was clearly related to the Mustang I concept that would be shown later that year with huge wraparound rear glass, turbine-inspired bumpers and enormous side scoops. The other proposals from the studio were more conservative, featuring simple lines, grilles reminiscent of the Falcon, and one even borrowing the jet-thruster-style taillights made famous on the Thunderbird. Lincoln-Mercury had some impressively bold designs, particularly its fastback that had buttresses to extend the shape all the way to the tail. This car had two different side trim possibilities. The other Lincoln-Mercury design was toned down a bit, but had two interesting possibilities for side detailing, as well as some crisp, low-profile tail fins.