Find or Sell Used Cars, Trucks, and SUVs in USA

2003 Mercedes-benz G55 Amg Base Sport Utility 4-door 5.5l on 2040-cars

Year:2003 Mileage:76000 Color: Black /
 Black
Location:

Brookline, Massachusetts, United States

Brookline, Massachusetts, United States
Advertising:
Transmission:Automatic
Body Type:Sport Utility
Engine:5.5L 5439CC 335Cu. In. V8 GAS SOHC Naturally Aspirated
Vehicle Title:Clear
Fuel Type:GAS
For Sale By:Private Seller
VIN: WDCYR46E33X140519 Year: 2003
Number of Cylinders: 8
Make: Mercedes-Benz
Model: G55 AMG
Trim: Base Sport Utility 4-Door
Warranty: Vehicle does NOT have an existing warranty
Drive Type: 4WD
Options: Sunroof, 4-Wheel Drive, Leather Seats, CD Player
Mileage: 76,000
Safety Features: Anti-Lock Brakes, Driver Airbag, Passenger Airbag
Sub Model: AMG G55
Power Options: Air Conditioning, Cruise Control, Power Locks, Power Windows, Power Seats
Exterior Color: Black
Interior Color: Black
Condition: Used: A vehicle is considered used if it has been registered and issued a title. Used vehicles have had at least one previous owner. The condition of the exterior, interior and engine can vary depending on the vehicle's history. See the seller's listing for full details and description of any imperfections. ... 

SUPER RARE 2003 Mercedes Benz AMG G55 with 76k miles BLACK ON BLACK 100% RUST FREE, This Truck is in near perfect shape! Few small scratches but no dents no major damages. The wheels are painted black by the previuos owner also the back tire cover. All power windows work fine the passenger window is a bit slower but works. The sun roof works well and all eletriic seats are in great working condition. ALL Leather is MINT Normal wear for a 2003 but no rips or stains. Truck has been serviced by Mercedes since new!!! This Truck is a hard find in this colorway and to be a AMG G55 is a PLUS, much better then the G500 that everyone has. (BUYERS ARE RESPONSABLE FOR SHIPPING CHRGES AND SETTING UP SHIPPING) email me at Travisgrillo@gmail.com for all questions or more pictures. serious buyers only and NO OVER SEAS BUYERS ALLOWED TO BID ON THIS TRUCK.  1 problem  (BACK LEFT WINDOW SEEMS TO BE STUCK UP AND NOT WORKING) Motor seems to be working but window will not go down and up...

Auto Services in Massachusetts

Westgate Tire & Auto Center ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Parts & Supplies, Tire Dealers
Address: 98 Westgate Dr, Westwood
Phone: (888) 603-6146

Wellesley Mazda ★★★★★

New Car Dealers, Used Car Dealers
Address: 965 Worcester St, Uphams-Corner
Phone: (866) 595-6470

Tufankjian Toyota of Braintree ★★★★★

New Car Dealers, Used Car Dealers, Wholesale Used Car Dealers
Address: 210 Union St, Jamaica-Plain
Phone: (781) 848-9300

Tint King Inc. ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Window Tinting
Address: West-Wareham
Phone: (978) 670-2927

South Shore Automotive ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Parts & Supplies, Automobile Accessories
Address: 359 Washington St, Minot
Phone: (781) 337-3916

South Shore Auto Specialists ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Parts & Supplies, Automobile Accessories
Address: 27 Robert J Way Ste 2, West-Wareham
Phone: (508) 732-0472

Auto blog

Here’s how 20 popular EVs fared in cold-weather testing in Norway

Sat, Mar 21 2020

Electric vehicles are known to suffer diminished performance in cold weather, but some do a better job than others hanging onto their range capacity while cabin heaters and frigid outdoor temperatures sap power from their batteries. Recently, the Norwegian Automobile Federation put the 20 of the best-selling battery-electric vehicles in the country to the test, to see not only how winter weather affected their range but also their charging times. The major findings: On average, electric vehicles lost 18.5% of their official driving range as determined by the European WLTP cycle. Electric vehicles also charge more slowly in cold temperatures. And interestingly, the researchers learned that EVs don’t simply shut down when they lose power but instead deliver a series of warnings to the driver, with driving comfort and speed levels maintained until the very last few miles. Because itÂ’s Norway, the worldÂ’s top market for electric and plug-in hybrid vehicles by market share, the test included many EVs that arenÂ’t available here in the U.S. But there are many familiar faces, among them the Nissan Leaf, Tesla Models S, 3 and X, Hyundai Kona (known here as the Kona Electric) and Ioniq, and Audi E-Tron. In terms of range, the top-performing EV was the Hyundai Kona, which lost only 9% of its official range, which the WTLP rated at 449 kilometers, or 279 miles, compared to its EPA-rated range of 258 miles on a full charge. It delivered 405 km, just enough to nudge it ahead of the Tesla Model 3, which returned 404 km. Other top performers included the Audi E-Tron, in both its 50 Quattro (13% lower range) and higher-powered 55 Quattro (14% lower) guises; the Hyundai Ioniq (10% lower); and Volkswagen e-Golf (11% lower). At 610 km (379 miles) the Tesla Model S has the longest WLTP range of all models tested and went the furthest, but still lost 23% of its range, though it also encountered energy-sapping heavy snow at the end of its test, when many cars had dropped out. The Model 3 lost 28% of its range. The worst performer? That goes to the Opel Ampera-e, better known stateside as the Chevrolet Bolt. It traveled 297 km (about 184 miles) in the test, which was nearly 30% lower than its stated WLTP range. We should also note that Opel, now owned by Groupe PSA, is phasing the car out in Europe and that Chevy recently upgraded the Bolt here in the U.S.

Why it's difficult to accurately test the efficiency of a plug-in car

Thu, Feb 5 2015

When it comes to electric vehicles and plug-ins in general, the Environmental Protection Agency-certified range is a hugely important number. While actual range anxiety is largely psychological, the magic number does provide a point of comparison of buyers considering one EV over another. The driving distance is also often touted by automakers when marketing their models. Unfortunately, as Green Car Reports finds in a recent deep dive, the way the EPA calculates the figure is a convoluted mess, and discovering the reasons why is definitely worth the read. The issue isn't about bad science but instead comes down to vague wording. The EPA's accepted range test is sourced from an evaluation called J-1634 from the Society of Automotive Engineers, and it seems to provide balanced results for vehicles that automatically reach a single state of charge when plugged in. However for models with multiple charge settings, the situation gets complicated very quickly. Of course, these modes are often created in the software, meaning that a car's certified driving distance can change with just a few taps of the keyboard without the real world results owners might experience actually changing. By showing the test's effects on the certified range for the Tesla Model S, Nissan Leaf and Mercedes-Benz B-Class Electric Drive over the last few years, Green Car Reports makes a compelling argument that it's the evaluation that needs to change. Thankfully, it appears that the solution is a very simple one. Get the details here.

Which electric cars can charge at a Tesla Supercharger?

Sun, Jul 9 2023

The difference between Tesla charging and non-Tesla charging. Electrify America; Tesla Tesla's advantage has long been its charging technology and Supercharger network. Now, more and more automakers are switching to Tesla's charging tech. But there are a few things non-Tesla drivers need to know about charging at a Tesla station. A lot has hit the news cycle in recent months with regard to electric car drivers and where they can and can't plug in. The key factor in all of that? Whether automakers switched to Tesla's charging standard. More car companies are shifting to Tesla's charging tech in the hopes of boosting their customers' confidence in going electric.  Here's what it boils down to: If you currently drive a Tesla, you can keep charging at Tesla charging locations, which use the company's North American Charging Standard (NACS), which has long served it well. The chargers are thinner, more lightweight and easier to wrangle than other brands.  If you currently drive a non-Tesla EV, you have to charge at a non-Tesla charging station like that of Electrify America or EVgo — which use the Combined Charging System (CCS) — unless you stumble upon a Tesla charger already equipped with the Magic Dock adapter. For years, CCS tech dominated EVs from everyone but Tesla.  Starting next year, if you drive a non-Tesla EV (from the automakers that have announced they'll make the switch), you'll be able to charge at all Supercharger locations with an adapter. And by 2025, EVs from some automakers won't even need an adaptor.  Here's how to charge up, depending on which EV you have:  Ford 2021 Ford Mustang Mach-E. Tim Levin/Insider Ford was the earliest traditional automaker to team up with Tesla for its charging tech. Current Ford EV owners — those driving a Ford electric vehicle already fitted with a CCS port — will be able to use a Tesla-developed adapter to access Tesla Superchargers starting in the spring. That means that, if you own a Mustang Mach-E or Ford F-150 Lightning, you will need the adapter in order to use a Tesla station come 2024. But Ford will equip its future EVs with the NACS port starting in 2025 — eliminating the need for any adapter. Owners of new Ford EVs will be able to pull into a Supercharger station and juice up, no problem. General Motors Cadillac Lyriq. Cadillac GM will also allow its EV drivers to plug into Tesla stations.