2002 Land Rover Freelander S Sport Utility One Owner Low Mileage Service Records on 2040-cars
San Diego, California, United States
Engine:2.5L 2500CC 153Cu. In. V6 GAS DOHC Naturally Aspirated
Transmission:Automatic
Body Type:Sport Utility
Fuel Type:GAS
Interior Color: Gray
Make: Land Rover
Warranty: Vehicle does NOT have an existing warranty
Model: Freelander
Trim: S Sport Utility 4-Door
Options: 4-Wheel Drive, CD Player
Safety Features: Anti-Lock Brakes, Passenger Airbag
Drive Type: AWD
Power Options: Air Conditioning, Cruise Control, Power Locks, Power Windows
Mileage: 63,934
Number of Cylinders: 6
Sub Model: S MODEL ONE OWNER NON SMOKER
Exterior Color: Silver
This is a 2002 Land Rover Freelander S model. It has excellent original paint and near new interior. It is a one owner vehicle that was purchased and serviced here locally. This vehicle only has 63k original miles and has an extensive service history recorded on CarFax. The owner also had a service contract extending the warranty. I installed 4 new Falken tires and had my British mechanic inspect the vehicle. He replaced the differential mount and gave the vehicle a proper oil change. It runs and drives like new. You will not be disappointed. THIS VEHICLE HAS A 86 AUTOCHECK SCORE, CLEAN CARFAX AND CLEAR TITLE IN HAND. VEHICLE MAY BE INSPECTED PRIOR TO AUCTION ENDING AT BUYERS EXPENSE. SERVICE HISTORY: Date: Mileage: Source: Comments: 09/14/2002 14 California
Motor Vehicle Dept.
Encinitas, CA Title issued or updated
First owner reported
Titled or registered as
personal vehicle
Loan or lien reported 03/22/2005 Land Rover Miramar
San Diego, CA
858-693-1400
landrovermiramar.com Battery/charging system checked
Battery replaced
Front brake pads and rotors replaced
Oil and filter changed 06/20/2005 Land Rover Miramar
San Diego, CA
858-693-1400
landrovermiramar.com Battery replaced
Battery/charging system checked 09/27/2005 California
Motor Vehicle Dept.
Encinitas, CA Title issued or updated 08/05/2006 Land Rover Miramar
San Diego, CA
858-693-1400
landrovermiramar.com Maintenance inspection completed
Oil and filter changed
Tire condition and pressure checked
Brake light switch replaced
Tires rotated and balanced
Front crankshaft oil seal replaced 08/12/2006 21,021 Service Plan Co.
Encinitas, CA Service contract issued 12/14/2006 23,273 Service Plan Co. Service contract claim
Vehicle serviced
Cooling system serviced 12/27/2006 Land Rover Miramar
San Diego, CA
858-693-1400
landrovermiramar.com Front crankshaft oil seal replaced
Coolant reservoir replaced
Cooling system checked 06/13/2007 Land Rover Miramar
San Diego, CA
858-693-1400
landrovermiramar.com Brake light switch replaced
Front brake pads and rotors replaced 08/02/2007 Land Rover Miramar
San Diego, CA
858-693-1400
landrovermiramar.com Window(s) checked
Rear window regulator(s) replaced 12/10/2007 29,696 Service Plan Co. Service contract claim
Cooling system serviced 12/20/2007 Land Rover Miramar
San Diego, CA
858-693-1400
landrovermiramar.com Cooling system checked
A/C and heating system checked
Oil and filter changed 05/02/2008 Land Rover Miramar
San Diego, CA
858-693-1400
landrovermiramar.com Vehicle serviced 09/16/2008 34,631 California
Inspection Station
Encinitas, CA Passed emissions inspection 11/10/2008 35,711 Service Plan Co. Service contract claim
Cooling system serviced 11/15/2008 Land Rover Miramar
San Diego, CA
858-693-1400
landrovermiramar.com Oil and filter changed
Brake light switch replaced
Thermostat replaced
Cooling system checked 01/21/2009 36,921 Service Plan Co. Service contract claim
Cooling system serviced 01/29/2009 Land Rover Miramar
San Diego, CA
858-693-1400
landrovermiramar.com Cooling system checked
Upper intake manifold replaced 01/30/2009 36,943 CALIFORNIA AUTOHAUS
Encinitas, CA
760-334-0193
Front brake pads replaced 07/31/2009 40,527 Land Rover Miramar
San Diego, CA
858-693-1400
landrovermiramar.com Maintenance inspection completed
Fuel pump replaced 09/28/2010 48,090 California
Inspection Station
Encinitas, CA Passed emissions inspection 02/22/2012 57,711 Charlie's Foreign Car
Encinitas, CA
760-753-4969
Anti-theft/keyless remote battery replaced
Tire condition and pressure checked
Oil and filter changed
Exterior lights checked 04/17/2012 58,500 Charlie's Foreign Car
Encinitas, CA
760-753-4969
Tire condition and pressure checked 06/08/2012 59,945 Encinitas Foreign & Domestic Auto
Encinitas, CA
760-632-0830
Tire condition and pressure checked
Battery replaced
Battery/charging system checked 07/16/2012 60,464 CALIFORNIA AUTOHAUS
Encinitas, CA
760-334-0193
Vehicle serviced 10/05/2012 61,474 California
Inspection Station
Encinitas, CA Passed emissions inspection
On Aug-23-13 at 14:23:08 PDT, seller added the following information:
This vehicle comes with 2 keys and 2 remotes.
Land Rover Freelander for Sale
Auto Services in California
Yuba City Toyota Lincoln-Mercury ★★★★★
World Auto Body Inc ★★★★★
Wilson Way Glass ★★★★★
Willie`s Tires & Alignment ★★★★★
Wholesale Import Parts ★★★★★
Wheel Works ★★★★★
Auto blog
Kia leads J.D. Power's Vehicle Dependability Study for 2022
Thu, Feb 10 2022For the first year ever, Kia leads J.D. Power's annual Vehicle Dependability Study with a score of 145 problems per 100 vehicles. Buick (147) and Hyundai (148) round out the top three. The highest premium brand on the list is Genesis, with a score of 148. It's common for so-called "mass market" brands to lead this particular study, according to J.D. Power, as "premium" brands "typically incorporate more technology in their vehicles, which increases the likelihood for problems to occur" and aren't necessarily built to a higher standard that less-expensive brands. The highest-rated single nameplate is the Porsche 911. It's the third time out of the past four years and the second year in a row that Porsche's quintessential sports car has taken top honors. Porsche as a brand sits in seventh place (162) just behind Lexus (159) and ahead of Dodge (166). At the very bottom of the list is Land Rover with a dismal score of 284; the SUV specialist held the same unfortunate distinction on last year's list. Ram (266), Volvo (256), Alfa Romeo (245) and Acura (244) also performed poorly. The overall industry average score sits at 192 — mass market brands average a score of 190 while premium brands sit 14 points lower at 204. While Tesla is unofficially included in some of J.D. Power's results, the agency says the sample size it has access to for this study is too small to include. As has been the case for the past several years, infotainment systems dominate the list of problems reported by owners. Popular (or unpopular, depending on your point of view) complaints include built-in voice recognition (8.3 PP100), Android Auto/Apple CarPlay connectivity (5.4 PP100), built-in Bluetooth system (4.5 PP100), not enough power plugs/USB ports (4.2 PP100), navigation systems difficult to understand/use (3.7 PP100), touchscreen/display screen (3.6 PP100), and navigation system inaccurate/outdated map (3.6 PP100). While problems with the car's infotainment and technology packages are indeed bothersome, it's important to remember that such issues aren't usually leaving owners stranded with an immovable vehicle like a broken transmission or blown engine would. Culling infotainment complaints from the results would reduce the average problem-per-100-vehicle score by a staggering 51.9 points. The vehicles included in this study are from the 2019 model year. That means owners have had three years to get to know their cars and trucks. It's the 33rd year that J.D.
Range Rover versus Mercedes-Benz: Which makes a more appealing SUV?
Mon, Aug 14 2017From time to time — truth be told, all the time — the Autoblog staff enjoys a good debate on the merits and demerits of the cars and trucks we drive each week. This week, we spent some time in a brand-new Land Rover Range Rover Supercharged SUV, a model some of us think sits at the pinnacle of the luxury utility vehicle segment. Others disagree. The following is a real-life online debate that took place over the course of a few hours. Have a read, and feel free to take sides. There's a poll at the end so you can make your voice heard. Consumer Editor Jeremy Korzeniewski: Strange as it may sound, Jeremy Clarkson and I have a few things in common, most obvious of which is that we share a given name. But we also both love cars so much that we decided to turn our automotive passion into a career — with varying degrees of success, of course — and we both have come to realize over time that there's no point in trying to topple the Land Rover Range Rover as the world's best luxury off-road utility vehicle. Thing is, this universal truth isn't quite as universally shared as I think it should be. In fact, my esteemed colleague Alex Kierstein believes that Mercedes-Benz makes the most desirable four-wheel-drive off-road vehicles. He's clearly wrong, but I feel obligated to let him explain his choice, though it won't go without a rebuttal. Senior Editor Alex Kierstein: That's correct, and so am I in this regard. I'm sorry, Jeremy, but it's an irrefutable fact that Mercedes-Benz is doing the best interiors in the business now. And the interior is where you're going to spend most of your time, at least when the thing's running. The Range Rover's interior simply isn't as special, and frankly it'll be in the shop enough that you won't enjoy it. Now, stepping into pretty much any contemporary Mercedes sedan interior is a "wow" moment. They seem special — posh, exclusive, luxurious. The SUVs, all older vehicles coming due for total redesigns at some point in the future, are lagging a bit, but it's still a premium and upscale experience. Especially since performance is almost academic at this point. Anything in this class is going to be powerful, almost absurdly so. So why not go for the one that makes you feel like royalty, rather than your mechanic? JK: I just want to point out that it was you who brought reliability into this discussion.
2019 BMW X7 vs luxury SUV rivals: Comparing specs and photos
Wed, Oct 17 2018Today we get our first-ever look at the first-ever 2019 BMW X7 crossover. We've actually already had our first-ever drive in an X7 Prototype. And so, we thought it appropriate to follow that up today with the first-ever X7 comparison of specs between BMW's first-ever three-row crossover with legitimate room for seven and its many high-dollar competitors. On paper, the 2019 X7 definitely seems to most closely align with the Mercedes-Benz GLS-Class. Their similar dimensions, interior space, engine choices and price would certainly imply where BMW placed the target when developing X7. We used those same elements to determine three-row vehicles likely to be cross-shopped or that should be cross-shopped. These include the Audi Q7, Land Rover Discovery, Volvo XC90 and Lincoln Navigator. Yes, the latter is a truck-based SUV as opposed to a crossover, but tell that to all the people lining out the door at the local Lincoln emporium. They do not care, and neither shall we. We also included the 2019 BMW X5, which was completely redesigned for this year and therefore not the first-ever. That makes it less appealing? Either way, lining the new X5 up with the SUV that leapfrogs it atop BMW's SUV hierarchy should provide a good idea of just how much more you get by going up a model number. Engines and model lineup Again, the X7 aligns closest with the GLS, offering a base six-cylinder in its xDrive40i model and an upgrade turbo V8 in the xDrive50i. The Mercedes engines have greater output, but the GLS still accelerates slower than the BMW. As the 2019 X5 offers the exact same engines, we would also expect the X7's fuel economy to be superior to the GLS once its estimates are announced. It should be noted, though, that the GLS offers a high-powered AMG model whereas we anticipate the X7 to offer a plug-in hybrid model comparable to the X5 upcoming xDrive45e model. The other luxury SUVs diverge in their engine choices and model lineup. The Audi Q7 offers a base turbocharged four-cylinder, as does the Volvo XC90 in its T5 model, which we left out of the above chart entirely for space reasons. That the Q7 3.0 TFSI supercharged V6 gets the same fuel economy estimates as the four-cylinder is proof positive that engine is purely around for its lower base price.