Find or Sell Used Cars, Trucks, and SUVs in USA

2007 Hyundai Accent 102k Runs Great No Issues ! on 2040-cars

US $4,500.00
Year:2007 Mileage:102000
Location:

Chandler, Arizona, United States

Chandler, Arizona, United States
Advertising:

We took very good care of this car... always serviced it on time. Our daughter used it when she was in high school and college. Never broke down. Very dependable, affordable transportation. Excellent choice for your high school or college kid, or for a new driver. Avoid monthly car payments and keep your insurance cost low- not to mention the gas savings ! No known mechanical problems. You can have your mechanic check it out before you buy it. The only minor cosmetic issues are these:  driver side sun visor is broken and needs to be replaced. The seats have some stains but a good detail shop can take them out. The paint on the right side is a bit faint in a small area because of sun light. No damage or dents anywhere. AM/FM radio, CD, nice cold AC.  All questions welcome.

Auto Services in Arizona

Windshield Replacement Phoenix ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Windshield Repair, Glass-Auto, Plate, Window, Etc
Address: 3309 N 70th St, Guadalupe
Phone: (602) 904-7237

Windshield Replacement & Auto Glass Repair Chandler ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Windshield Repair, Glass-Broken
Address: 975 E Riggs Rd, Sun-Lakes
Phone: (480) 745-2403

University Motor Werks ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service
Address: 2730 E McDowell Rd Ste 5, Guadalupe
Phone: (602) 225-1107

The Path Less Traveled Automotive ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Brake Repair, Auto Transmission
Address: 10420 E Apache Trail, Apache-Junction
Phone: (480) 807-0100

Supreme Automotive ★★★★★

Automobile Parts & Supplies, Auto Body Parts
Address: 416 E Baseline Rd Ste 8, Chandler
Phone: (480) 558-4888

San Tan Automotive ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service
Address: 22014 S Ellsworth Rd, Queen-Creek
Phone: (480) 987-0133

Auto blog

Ford Mustang Mach-E fails Sweden's moose test

Wed, Sep 29 2021

The infamous moose test has claimed another casualty. This time it's the Ford Mustang Mach-E AWD Long Range, which was tested in an electric four-way alongside the Tesla Model Y, Hyundai Ioniq 5 and Skoda Enyaq iV (an electric utility vehicle closely related to the Volkswagen ID.4 that is sold in the United States). According to the Swedish testers at Teknikens Varld, Ford's electric car not only failed to hit the speed necessary for a passing grade, it didn't perform well at slower speeds, either. To pass the outlet's moose test, a car has to complete a rapid left-right-straight S-shaped pattern marked by cones at a speed of at least 72 km/h (44.7 miles per hour). The test is designed to mimic the type of avoidance maneuver a driver would have to take in order to avoid hitting something that wandered into the road, which in Sweden may be a moose but could just as easily be a deer or some other member of the animal kingdom elsewhere in the world, or possibly a child or car backing into the motorway. Not only is the maneuver very aggressive, it's also performed with weights belted into each seat and more weight added to the cargo area to hit the vehicle's maximum allowable carrying capacity. The Mustang Mach-E only managed to complete the moose test at 68 km/h (42.3 mph), well below the passing-grade threshold. Even at much lower speeds, Teknikens Varld says the Mach-E (which boasts the highest carrying capacity and was therefore loaded with more weight than the rest of the vehicles tested in this quartet) is "too soft in the chassis" and suffers from "too slow steering." Proving that it is indeed possible to pass the test, the Hyundai and Skoda completed the maneuver at the 44.7-mph figure required for a passing grade and the Tesla did it at 46.6 mph, albeit with less weight in the cargo area. It's not clear whether other versions of the Mustang Mach-E would pass the test. It's also unknown if Ford will make any changes to its chassis tuning or electronic stability control software, as some other automakers have done after a poor performance from Teknikens Varld, to improve its performance in the moose test. Related video:

Motorcyclist gives rude driver a taste of instant justice

Wed, Nov 30 2016

A British motorcyclist proved that no good deed goes unpunished recently when he tried to return a motorist's wallet and got nothing but abuse for his trouble. According to the Daily Mail, a motorcyclist somewhere in England spotted a driver in a silver Hyundai pull out of a gas station with a wallet and cellphone on the roof. As the driver pulled off, the wallet slid off the roof and landed in the street, where the motorcyclist retrieved it. With wallet in hand, the motorcyclist set off in pursuit of the Hyundai driver, but when he approached the car the driver didn't seem too happy to see him. As the rider approached, the Hyundai driver tried to escape him, then spat a string of profanity at the rider as he pulled up to the car's window. The motorcyclist then flung the driver's wallet at him through the car's open window, whereupon the driver quickly changed his tune. "Thank you so much, bro!" the driver is heard saying in the video. The motorcyclist decided that he'd had enough abuse and wasn't buying the Hyundai driver's improved attitude, so he decided to extract a little revenge. He grabbed the driver's phone off the Hyundai's roof. He held it up to the driver of the car and then casually tossed it on the ground. Then the motorcyclist rode away, presumably believing he'd taught the rude driver a valuable lesson. Related Video: News Source: The Daily Mail Auto News Weird Car News Hyundai Motorcycle road rage good samaritan motorcyclist

Why Kia doesn't need a premium brand

Sat, Dec 5 2015

Hyundai's creation of the Genesis luxury brand means it and fellow Korean brand Kia have finally hit the mainstream in the U.S. – as far as products are concerned – after nearly three decades of trying. Which is about as long as it took Toyota and Nissan to roll out Lexus and Infiniti, respectively. It's history repeating itself. Genesis is supposed to be the way Hyundai's premium models get the respect they deserve, without carrying the baggage of a name associated with frugality. Hyundai has, in fact, built up a reputation over the last decade or so for cars that compete head-on with class leaders, rather than aim to be 90 percent as good for 75 percent of the price. And because Kia shares a number of components with Hyundai, its vehicles have also steadily become not only better mainstream vehicles, but have continued to aim higher than their price points. Does Kia need to follow now in its parent's steps with a prestige brand to market its most expensive models? I'm aware of the Kia K900, the company's deepest foray into luxury territory notably occupied by Lexus. Kia, however, has consistently been pushing this $60,000 full-size luxury sedan along with $0 down, low monthly payment lease deals. Turns out there really aren't many people looking for a full-size Kia luxury sedan. Or maybe they're just waiting to get it for $20,000 in a couple of years. Consider the K900 and Genesis when I convince you Kia already makes upscale cars to rival those with premium badges. They just don't happen to be its most expensive model. Shortly after Hyundai's announcement it would spin its luxury models off into the Genesis brand, I spent a few days with a 2016 Kia Sorento SXL. And I'm willing to call it a more convincing attempt to get people out of luxury cars than the K900. Driving the Sorento is not an emotional experience. You feel parental driving it, thinking you might've forgotten to pick your kids up until you remember you don't actually have kids. But after settling into the nicely stitched and perforated leather seats, you respect its comfort, quiet and amenities. The headliner is soft, the stitching on the dash top is convincingly real and everyone is impressed by the sharp graphics on the touchscreen and the slick powered shade that reveals an expansive glass roof. A Kia Sorento costing more than $46,000 sounds absurd until you wonder how much better an Acura MDX or Lexus RX350 is when those cost as much as $10,000 more.