2003 Hyundai Sonata Clean Needs A Motor, Mechanic's Special Ran Great $ave Now ! on 2040-cars
Year:2003Mileage:121000
Location:
Bridgeport, Connecticut, United States
Advertising:
hi. my mechanic and good friend down the street called me on this car. I was a little skeptical, but went down to help out. the car turns out to be pretty nice; please see all photos. solid body and paint, intact interior, full power, windows, locks, cruise, tilt, sun roof, cloth and more !~~
turns out the previous owner, customer, drove the car daily and the engine failed. we can't say how or why, but the motor does not turn over at this point. too many projects and a bunch of loose ends means it is for sale. I can get close to $400 by junking the car, but it seems a shame. I have had one or two of these Hyundai's before, they run and drive great. comfy cars, safe and reliable. too nice to just scrap it, why not bid and buy. great project and a solid car to work with. just 3 blocks off I-95, exit #24, an hour from new York city (or less).
please feel free to bid, buy, pick up, call or email anytime. thnx ~!~
Not all accidents / issues are reported to AutoCheck
Information Reported! AutoCheck shows accidents reported to AutoCheck for this 2003 Hyundai Sonata (KMHWF25S03A811211). Below you will find the date and location reported for the accident. Not all accidents or damage events are reported to AutoCheck.
Accidents Reported on This Vehicle
Accident No.
Reported Date
Location
1
03/16/2008
ORANGE, CT
Reported accidents or damage events are a result of vehicle collisions or other non-collision incidents such as vandalism or theft. Not all accidents or damage events are reported to AutoCheck.
Title and ProblemCheck
Your vehicle checks out! AutoCheck's database for this 2003 Hyundai Sonata (KMHWF25S03A811211) shows no negative titles or other problems. When reported to AutoCheck, these events can indicate serious past damage or other significant problems, and disqualifies the vehicle for AutoCheck Buyback Protection. Check the Vehicle Use and EventCheck for reported accidents that can affect vehicle safety and value.
0 Problem(s) Reported:
15 Title/Problem areas checked:
No abandoned title record
No damaged title or major damage incident record
No fire damaged title record
No grey market title record
No hail damage title record
No insurance loss title or probable total loss record
No junk or scrapped title record
No manufacturer buyback/lemon title record
No odometer problem title record
No rebuilt/rebuildable title record
No salvage title or salvage auction record
No water damaged title record
No NHTSA crash test record
No frame/unibody damage record
No recycling facility record
OdometerCheck
Your vehicle checks out! AutoCheck examined the reported odometer readings reported to AutoCheck for this 2003 Hyundai Sonata (KMHWF25S03A811211) and no indication of an odometer rollback or tampering was found. AutoCheck uses business rules to determine if reported odometer readings are significantly less than previously reported values. Not all reported odometer readings are used. Title and auction events also report odometer tampering or breakage.
0 Problem(s) Reported:
Mileage
Date Reported
6
05/15/2003
15,545
12/18/2003
15,545
02/25/2004
15,570
03/24/2004
85,000
01/13/2009
Vehicle Use and EventCheck
Information Reported! AutoCheck shows additional vehicle uses or events reported to AutoCheck for this 2003 Hyundai Sonata (KMHWF25S03A811211). This includes reported vehicle uses such as rental or lease, and events such as whether the vehicle has been reported to have had a loan/lien or duplicate title issued. Other events show if the vehicle has a reported accident and how many calculated accidents or if it has been reported stolen or repossessed. It is recommended to have pre-owned vehicles inspected by a third party prior to purchase.
Below are the historical events for this vehicle listed in chronological order. Any discrepancies will be in bold text.
Report Run Date: 2013-10-16 19:01:49.285 EDT
Vehicle: 2003 Hyundai Sonata (KMHWF25S03A811211)
Event Date
Event Location
Odometer Reading
Data Source
Event Detail
04/23/2003
MN
Independent Source
VEHICLE MANUFACTURED AND SHIPPED TO DEALER
05/15/2003
NC
6
Motor Vehicle Dept.
TITLE (Title #:779302031357107) (Leased Vehicle) REGISTRATION EVENT/RENEWAL (Leased Vehicle) TITLED OR REGISTERED AS A RENTAL VEHICLE, OR PART OF A RENTAL FLEET
12/18/2003
SOUTHEASTERN REGION
15,545
Auto Auction
REPORTED AT AUTO AUCTION
02/25/2004
SOUTHEASTERN REGION
15,545
Auto Auction
AUCTION ANNOUNCED AS REPOSSESSED
03/24/2004
MILFORD, CT
15,570
Motor Vehicle Dept.
TITLE (Title #:028279083) (Lien Reported)
03/24/2004
MILFORD, CT
Motor Vehicle Dept.
REGISTRATION EVENT/RENEWAL
02/14/2006
MILFORD, CT
Motor Vehicle Dept.
REGISTRATION EVENT/RENEWAL
02/29/2008
MILFORD, CT
Motor Vehicle Dept.
REGISTRATION EVENT/RENEWAL
03/16/2008
ORANGE, CT
Police Report
ACCIDENT REPORTED
01/13/2009
ORANGE, CT
85,000
Motor Vehicle Dept.
TITLE (Title #:031513200)
01/13/2009
ORANGE, CT
Motor Vehicle Dept.
REGISTRATION EVENT/RENEWAL
11/22/2010
ORANGE, CT
Motor Vehicle Dept.
REGISTRATION EVENT/RENEWAL
This Vehicle's Glossary
Below are the specific definitions for events that appear in this vehicle's report. More information is available in the full AutoCheck glossary.
Term
Section Location
Definition
Repossessed
Vehicle Use and EventCheck
The creditors or lessors have invoked legal authority to seize the vehicle due to default on a loan or lease.
Loan/Lien
Vehicle Use and EventCheck
A loan/lien is the legal right to take and hold or sell the vehicle of a debtor as security or payment for a debt. Normally, a vehicle will have a lien due to a loan or unpaid repair bill against the vehicle. Check with the seller to ensure that the lien has been satisfied.
Accident or Vehicle Damage
Vehicle Use and EventCheck
Reported accidents or damage events are a result of vehicle collisions or other non-collision incidents such as vandalism or theft. Not all accidents or damage events are reported to AutoCheck. Certain accident or damage events are reported by the source to have resulted in minor, moderate or severe damage to the vehicle, or the events are calculated by AutoCheck to have resulted in minor, moderate or severe damage based on the information reported. It is recommended to have pre-owned vehicles inspected by a third party prior to purchase.
Fleet, Rental and/or Lease Use
Vehicle Use and EventCheck
The vehicle has been reported as used as a fleet, rental and/or lease vehicle.
AutoCheck vehicle history report Terms and Conditions This report, and any reliance upon it, is subject to AutoCheck Terms and Conditions. If you obtained the report from a dealer, the dealer has been provided with these Terms & Conditions and can share them with you. These AutoCheck Terms and Conditions are also available at any time at www.autocheck.com/consumers/disclaimer.do or by writing to Experian: Experian Automotive C/O AutoCheck Customer Service 955 American Lane Schaumburg IL 60173
AutoCheck Buyback Protection Terms and Conditions This vehicle (KMHWF25S03A811211) qualifies for AutoCheck Buyback Protection. If you obtained the report from a dealer, the dealer has been provided with the terms and can share them with you. These Buyback Protection Terms and Conditions are also available to you at any time at www.autocheck.com/bbpterms or by writing to Experian: Experian Automotive C/O AutoCheckCustomer Service 955 American Lane Schaumburg IL 60173
About AutoCheck AutoCheck vehicle history reports by Experian Automotive is the leading vehicle history reporting service. With expert data handling, the Experian Automotive database houses over 4 billion records on a half a billion vehicles. Every AutoCheck vehicle history report will give you confidence when buying or selling your next used vehicle, with superior customer service every step of the way.
Patent Notice Certain aspects of this vehicle history report may be covered by U.S. Patent 8,005,759.
We had plenty of nice things to say about the sleek, new Hyundai Genesis Sedan when we drove the Korean domestic market version late last month. And while we're still waiting to find out just when the new rear-driver will arrive in the US market, Hyundai's home-market operations have released a series of videos on the new sedan. Now, unfortunately, all the videos are in Korean. While we haven't the foggiest idea of what they're actually saying, the eight videos in the series give a great look at the new Genesis Sedan in motion, as well as showing off some of the development process behind the newest member of the Hyundai family. We've embedded all eight videos below for your viewing pleasure. Have a look below.
Related: Most reliable cars and trucks of 2022 Â Every year, Consumer Reports ranks new cars based on their predicted reliability. We often see Toyota, Lexus, and a few other automakers near the top. But on the other side of the coin, the list of least reliable vehicles sometimes contains surprises. Â The organization surveys its members to determine the vehicles that exhibited the most problems over the prior year. Owners are asked about creaks and rattles, the durability of parts and trim, and mechanical issues. Consumer Reports assigns a weight to each problem and then uses them to create a score, with 100 being the best. Some familiar names appear on the list of least reliable vehicles (in order with the lowest predicted reliability score at the top), but there are a few eyebrow-raising models, followed by CR's score: Ford F-150 Hybrid: 4 Hyundai Kona Electric: 5 Lincoln Aviator: 8 Nissan Sentra: 9 Ford Explorer: 16 Chevrolet Bolt: 17 Chevrolet Silverado 1500/GMC Sierra 1500: 19 Jeep Gladiator: 21 Mercedes-Benz GLE: 23 Jeep Wrangler: 24 Consumer Reports noted that sedans are the most reliable vehicle category and found that trucks are far lower on the list. That said, the survey showed that trucks from American brands tended to have better reliability scores, so it’s surprising to see GMÂ’s big two and the Ford F-150 on the list. Part of their problematic ownership experience could be due to the fact that all three trucks have received recent updates, and the Ford was completely redesigned for 2022. New tech, fresh drivetrain components, and other improvements can upset the balance of reliability and make newer models look less dependable than their older counterparts. Related video: Green Chevrolet Ford GMC Hyundai Jeep Lincoln Mercedes-Benz Nissan Car Buying Truck Crossover Hatchback SUV Electric Hybrid Sedan Consumer Reports reliability
While automakers are quick to brag about winning a JD Power Initial Quality Study award, the reality, as we've pointed out before, is that these ratings are somewhat misleading, since IQS doesn't necessarily distinguish genuine quality issues. JD Power's new Tech Experience Index aims to solve that problem. The new metric takes the same 90-day approach as IQS but focuses exclusively on technology – collision protection, comfort and convenience, driving assistance, entertainment and connectivity, navigation, and smartphone mirroring. It splits the industry up into just seven segments, based loosely on size, which is why the Chevrolet Camaro is in the same division (mid-size) as Kia Sorento and the Mercedes-Benz GLE-Class is in the same segment as the Hyundai Genesis (mid-size premium). It makes for some screwy bedfellows, to be sure. Still, splitting tech experience away from initial quality should allow customers to make more informed and intelligent decisions when buying new vehicles. In the inaugural study, respondents listed BMW and Hyundai as the big winners, with two segment awards – the 2 Series for small premium and the 4 Series for compact premium, and the Genesis for mid-size premium and Tucson for small segment. The Chevrolet Camaro (midsize), Kia Forte (compact), and Nissan Maxima (large) scored individual wins. Ford also had a surprising hit with the Lincoln MKC, which ranked third in the compact premium segment behind the 4 Series and Lexus IS. This is a coup for the Blue Oval, whose woeful MyFord Touch systems made the brand a victim of the IQS' flaws in the early 2010s. But Ford and other automakers might not want to celebrate just yet. According to JD Power, there's still a lot of room for improvement – navigation systems were the lowest-rated piece of tech in the study. Instead, customers repeatedly saluted collision-avoidance and safety systems, giving the category the best marks of the study and listing blind-spot monitoring and backup cameras as two must-have features – 96 percent of respondents said they wanted those two systems in their next vehicle. But this isn't really a surprise. Implementation of safety systems from brand to brand is similar, and they don't require any input from users, unlike navigation and infotainment systems which are frustratingly deep.