Find or Sell Used Cars, Trucks, and SUVs in USA

1955 Ford Tbird Convertible on 2040-cars

US $23,983.00
Year:1955 Mileage:21285 Color: White
Location:

Newark, Delaware, United States

Newark, Delaware, United States
Advertising:
Transmission:Manual
Body Type:Convertible
Vehicle Title:Clear
Fuel Type:Gasoline
For Sale By:Dealer
VIN: P5FH238543 Year: 1955
Make: Ford
Model: Thunderbird
Warranty: Vehicle does NOT have an existing warranty
Mileage: 21,285
Exterior Color: White
Number of Cylinders: 8
Condition: UsedA vehicle is considered used if it has been registered and issued a title. Used vehicles have had at least one previous owner. The condition of the exterior, interior and engine can vary depending on the vehicle's history. See the seller's listing for full details and description of any imperfections.Seller Notes:"Rare 3 speed manual 1955 Convertible T-Bird with "Y" Block 282 V8. Triple white and top is like new. As you can tell by the photo's, the interior is in exceptional shape. Steering wheel assembly has been recently re-chromed and is in nice shape. Car has been off the frame for some of it's restoration process. "Tear Drop" spot lights adorn both sides and are handle functional from the inside. Car runs as well as it looks. Local owner trade on a New Era Camaro SS/RS Convertible we had in stock. No stories......just a nice ride and the first year of production of the original "Early Birds"! Title is in house shortly for our out of the country prospective buyers. Nostalgia books and parts catalogs are in trunk."

Auto Services in Delaware

Scott Honda ★★★★★

New Car Dealers, Used Car Dealers, Automobile Parts & Supplies
Address: 706 Autopark Blvd, Claymont
Phone: (610) 692-6000

Peninsula Total Car Care ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Auto Oil & Lube, Truck Service & Repair
Address: 309 E Carroll St, Delmar
Phone: (410) 219-7712

Jeff D`Ambrosio Auto Group ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, New Car Dealers, Used Car Dealers
Address: 1221 E Lancaster Ave, Talleyville
Phone: (484) 593-5000

Curtis Automotive Center Inc. ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automotive Tune Up Service, Inspection Service
Address: 1151 W Chester Pike, Yorklyn
Phone: (610) 431-1818

Carmen`s Auto Body ★★★★★

Automobile Body Repairing & Painting, Automobile Parts & Supplies, Auto Body Parts
Address: 739 Mount Rd Ste F1, Winterthur
Phone: (610) 459-3080

Bargain Car, Truck & Van Rentals ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Car Rental, Truck Rental
Address: 4400 Edgmont Ave, Wilmington
Phone: (610) 874-0204

Auto blog

Ford's Troller introduces even more rugged T4 SUVs in Sao Paulo

Mon, 27 Oct 2014

The Bronco may be long gone from Ford dealerships back home, but down in Brazil its spirit lives on in the Troller brand. Founded independently in 1995, Ford do Brasil took over Troller in 2007 and has been teasing us with its rough-and-tumble SUVs ever since. So with the Sao Paulo Motor Show coming up, Troller has revealed this special version of the T4.
Looking even more rugged than the existing three-door sport-ute, this special T4 packs a snorkel, winch, upgraded bumpers and knobbier tires. We're not sure what to make of the "sophisticated" brown and tan paint job, but send it north and the Jeep Wrangler would have a new challenger on its hands... especially since the Toyota FJ Cruiser was discontinued.
Alongside the version seen here, Troller will also exhibit another T4 outfitted for rescue workers. Scope out initial details of both in the press release below, enclosed in both its original Portuguese and auto-translated into English.

Watch as U.S. auto industry springs back to life after lockdown

Tue, May 19 2020

WARREN, Michigan — The Detroit Three automakers and their suppliers began restarting assembly lines on Monday after a two-month coronavirus lockdown in a slow revival of a sector that employs nearly 1 million people in the United States. On a chilly and damp Monday morning, hundreds of workers at Fiat Chrysler Automobile's (FCA) truck plant in Warren, Michigan, began lining up before 4 a.m. to start the 5 a.m. shift. Signs overhead read: "Let's restart." "I'm a little nervous," said Larry Smith, 53, of New Baltimore, who works on wheel alignment away from the assembly line. "They made all the precautions (and) they've done everything they can to prepare us ... I'm trusting in God." Detroit automakers on Monday said there were no issues with absenteeism as the plants opened. FCA reopened four U.S. assembly plants on Monday, including Warren Truck, on a single shift, as well as four parts plants. The reopening of car plants will be a closely watched test of whether workers across a range of U.S. industries can return to factories in large numbers without a resurgence of infections. General Motors Co, Ford Motor Co and FCA have all been preparing for weeks to reopen their North American factories in a push to restart work in an industry that accounts for about 6% of U.S. economic activity. Investors welcomed the gradual restart, sending GM's shares up more than 9% on Monday. FCA shares rose 7.3%, while Ford's were up 6.7%. Auto companies have redesigned assembly lines and retrained workers in an effort to avoid coronavirus outbreaks that could derail production again. Workers entering factories on Monday were checked by temperature monitors. Face masks or shields are standard protective equipment. Jobs such as installing seat belts that used to require two or more workers to get close together inside a vehicle have been redesigned to keep people a safe distance apart. Plastic screens have been installed along assembly lines to separate workers leaning in to the engine compartments of vehicles. Break areas have been reconfigured to keep workers six feet apart. The Detroit automakers have collaborated with each other and with the United Auto Workers to develop common coronavirus safety practices. Other automakers in the United States are adopting similar safety measures.

Ford made three big mistakes in calculating MPG for 2013 C-Max Hybrid

Tue, Jun 17 2014

It's been a rough time for the official fuel economy figures for the Ford C-Max Hybrid. When the car was released in 2012, Ford made a huge deal about how it would beat the Toyota Prius V, which was rated at 42 combined miles per gallon, 44 city and 40 highway. The Ford? 47 mpg across the board. How did Ford come to this place, where its Prius-beater turned into an also-ran? Well, after hearing customer complaints and issuing a software update in mid-2013, then discovering a real problem with the numbers last fall and then making a big announcement last week that the fuel economy ratings of six different 2013 and 2014 model year vehicles would need to be lowered, the C-Max Hybrid has ended up at 40 combined, 42 city and 37 highway. In other words, the Prius trumps it, as daily drivers of those two vehicles have known for a long time. The changes will not only affect the window sticker, but also the effect that the C-Max Hybrid (and the five other Ford vehicles that had their fuel economy figures lowered last week) have on Ford's compliance with greenhouse gas and CAFE rules for model year 2013 and 2014. How did Ford come to this place, where its Prius-beater turned into an also-ran? There are two technical answers to that question, which we've got below, as well as some context for how Ford's mistakes will play out in the bigger world of green vehicles. Let's start with Ford's second error, which is easy to do since we documented it in detail last year (the first, needing to do a software update, was also covered). The basic gist is that Ford used the general label rule (completely legally) to test the Fusion Hybrid and use those numbers to figure out how efficient the C-Max Hybrid is. That turned out to be a mistake, since the two vehicles are different enough that their numbers were not comparable, despite having the same engine, transmission and test weight, as the rules require. You can read more details here. Ford's Said Deep admitted that the TRLHP issue is completely separate from the general label error from last year. Now let's move on to last week's announcement. What's interesting is that the new recalculation of the MPG numbers – downward, of course – was caused by a completely separate issue, something called the Total Road Load Horsepower (TRLHP). Ford's Said Deep admitted to AutoblogGreen that the TRLHP issue had nothing to do with the general label error from last year.