2011 Ford Ranger Xlt on 2040-cars
900 Nc Highway 66 S, Kernersville, North Carolina, United States
Engine:4.0L V6 12V MPFI SOHC
Transmission:5-Speed Automatic
VIN (Vehicle Identification Number): 1FTKR4EE7BPB08183
Stock Num: G11422
Make: Ford
Model: Ranger XLT
Year: 2011
Exterior Color: Gray
Interior Color: Medium Dark Flint
Options: Drive Type: RWD
Number of Doors: 4 Doors
Mileage: 20470
Local Trade!!! Includes a CARFAX buyback guarantee.. Clean CARFAX History!!! Complete CARFAX Service History!!! This XLT has less than 21k miles* PRICES SLASHED!!! Safety Features Include: ABS, Traction control, Passenger Airbag, Front fog/driving lights, Stability control - Stability control with anti-roll...Relax in the comfort of features like: Power locks, Power windows, Air conditioning, Power mirrors, Tilt steering wheel... CD Player, AUX, MP3, Towing, Owner's Manual.We Will Not Be Undersold! CALL our Sales Dept. @ 877-519-6249 for more information. WE HAVE ONE OF THE TRIAD'S LARGEST SELECTION OF GM CERTIFIED USED VEHICLES. THIS IS OUR 43RD YEAR HERE IN BUSINESS, AND WE ARE HERE TO HELP YOU FIND THE RIGHT VEHICLE. PRICES DO NOT INCLUDE STATE SALES TAX, TAG FEE, $399 DOCUMENTATION FEE.
Ford Ranger for Sale
2003 ford ranger xlt(US $3,900.00)
2008 ford ranger xlt(US $10,990.00)
2002 ford ranger edge(US $7,990.00)
2010 ford ranger sport(US $17,950.00)
2011 ford ranger xlt(US $10,947.00)
2001 ford ranger xlt(US $5,495.00)
Auto Services in North Carolina
Wright`s Transmission ★★★★★
Wilburn Auto Body Shop Belmont ★★★★★
Whitaker`s Auto Repair ★★★★★
Trull`s Body & Paint Shop ★★★★★
Tint Wizard ★★★★★
Texaco Xpress Lube ★★★★★
Auto blog
Big electric trucks won't save the planet, says the NYT
Tue, Feb 21 2023When The New York Times decides that an issue is an issue, be prepared to read about it at length. Rarely will a week passes these days when the esteemed news organization doesn’t examine the realities, myths and alleged benefits and drawbacks of electric vehicles, and even The Atlantic joins in sometimes. That revolution, marked by changes in manufacturing, consumer habits and social “consciousness,” may in fact be upon us. Or it may not. Nonetheless, the newspaper appears committed to presenting to the public these pros and cons. In this recently published article titled, “Just How Good for the Planet Is That Big Electric Pickup Truck?”—wow, thatÂ’s a mouthful — the Times focuses on the “bigness” of the current and pending crop of EVs, and how that impacts or will impact the environment and road safety. This is not what news organizations these days are fond of calling “breaking news.” In October, we pointed to an essay in The Atlantic that covered pretty much the same ground, and focused on the Hummer as one particular villain, In the paper and online on Feb. 18, the Times' Elana Shao observes how “swapping a gas pickup truck for a similar electric one can produce significant emissions savings.” She goes on: “Take the Ford F-150 pickup truck compared with the electric F-150 Lightning. The electric versions are responsible for up to 50 percent less greenhouse gas emissions per mile.” But she right away flips the argument, noting the heavier electric pickup trucks “often require bigger batteries and more electricity to charge, so they end up being responsible for more emissions than other smaller EVs. Taking into consideration the life cycle emissions per mile, they end up just as polluting as some smaller gas-burning cars.” Certainly, itÂ’s been drummed into our heads that electric cars donÂ’t run on air and water but on electricity that costs money, and that the public will be dealing with “the shift toward electric SUVs, pickup trucks and crossover vehicles, with some analysts estimating that SUVs, pickup trucks and vans could make up 78 percent of vehicle sales by 2025." No-brainer alert: Big vehicles cost more to charge. And then thereÂ’s the safety question, which was cogently addressed in the Atlantic story. Here Shao reiterates data documenting the increased risks of injuries and deaths caused by larger, heavier vehicles.
Jaguar design boss admits X-Type was a mistake
Thu, 19 Sep 2013History has a way of repeating itself, especially in the auto industry. When Jaguar was owned by Ford, the British brand attempted to field a competitor for the BMW 3 Series, called the X-Type. Based on the bones of a Ford Mondeo, it aped the styling of Jaguar's flagship model, the XJ, while borrowing liberally from the Ford parts bin. That was 2001.
Now, in 2013, Jaguar is planning a new 3 Series challenger based on the platform previewed by the C-X17 Concept, while Ford is attempting to take the latest Mondeo upmarket. The moves have both brands recognizing where, why, and how the X-Type failed. "It didn't look mature or powerful or anything. It was just a car," Jaguar's current head of advanced design, Julian Thomson, told PistonHeads. Basing the X-Type on a front-drive car while giving it styling that was meant for a rear-driver lead to proportions that "were plainly wrong," Thomson told PH. Ford's European head of quality, Gunnar Herrmann, added that the X-Type was "a fake Jaguar, because every piece I touch is Ford."
For what it's worth, the X-Type's successor in the segment will sport rear-drive, with plenty of input from Ian Callum. Thomson described the new model, which would challenge the 3 Series as having, "Big wheels right to the ends of the car, low bonnet, short overhangs, very low cabins." Sounds good to us.
Recharge Wrap-up: Ford 1.0L EcoBoost a hit in Europe; Build a tiny inverter, win $1 million
Mon, Aug 11 2014In Europe, Ford's 1.0-liter EcoBoost engine is the best-selling turbocharged gasoline engine. The three-cylinder motor powers 20 percent of new Fords sold in Europe. Earlier this year, it won its third International Engine of the Year award, and between January and June, it was sold in about 120,000 cars. So far this year, 38 percent of Fords sold in the Netherlands, 35 percent in Denmark and 32 percent in Switzerland have been powered by the 1.0-liter EcoBoost. The engine's turbocharger spins at 248,000 rpm, and provides 24 psi of pressure. The engine produces up to 138 horsepower, depending on the version. Read more in the press release below. When lithium-ion battery packs are retired from the road, remanufacturing, repurposing, and recycling are worthwhile options, according to a study by Mineta Transportation Institute. The study included a cost-benefit analysis of those three options, and found remanufacturing to be the best route. To get the most out of them, batteries should be tested and have their damaged cells replaced then put back to use. Repurposing is the second best option, using the remaining available charge for something besides cars. Recycling on its own isn't profitable, but it could make economic sense with "increased technological breakthroughs." Learn more at Recycling International or download the report here. A smaller inverter for EVs can win you $1 million. The Little Box Challenge is an open competition to build a power inverter with a density of at least 50 watts per cubic inch. Google and the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) are offering the hefty prize to the team that builds the inverter with the highest power density within an enclosed volume of 40 cubic inches. Teams must register by September 30. Read more at Green Car Congress or learn more at the Little Box Challenge website.