Find or Sell Used Cars, Trucks, and SUVs in USA

2008 Ford Ranger Extended Cab 2wd Xl One Owner Fleet Maintained Very Clean Truck on 2040-cars

US $5,495.00
Year:2008 Mileage:183341
Location:

Saint Charles, Missouri, United States

Saint Charles, Missouri, United States
Advertising:

UP FOR BID IS A 2008 FORD RANGER XL EXTENDED CAB ONE OWNER FLEET MAINTAINED. THIS IS A CLEAN, WELL MAINTAINED TRUCK THAT RUNS AND DRIVES GREAT. IT HAS A STRONG RUNNING 3.0L V6 AND SMOOTH SHIFTING AUTOMATIC TRANSMISSION. THIS IS A GREAT TRUCK THAT WAS USED FOR SURVEYING AND LIVED A PRETTY EASY LIFE. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS PLEASE FEEL FREE TO ASK, WE HAVE BEEN IN BUSINESS FOR ALMOST 30 YEARS AND WOULD BE HAPPY TO HELP YOU IN ANY WAY WE CAN. AS ALWAYS THERE ARE NO BUYERS FEES! WHAT YOU BID IS WHAT YOU PAY! WE OFFER FREE PICK UP AT LAMBERT ST.LOUIS AIRPORT. THANKS AND GOOD LUCK BIDDING!

Auto Services in Missouri

Wodohodsky Auto Body ★★★★★

Automobile Body Repairing & Painting, Automobile Parts & Supplies, Truck Body Repair & Painting
Address: 24300 County Road 9020, Dixon
Phone: (573) 759-6250

West County Nissan ★★★★★

New Car Dealers, Used Car Dealers
Address: 14747 Manchester Road, Saint-Ann
Phone: (636) 394-0330

Wayne`s Auto Body ★★★★★

Automobile Body Repairing & Painting
Address: 9902 S Broadway, Sulphur-Springs
Phone: (314) 544-4141

Superior Collision Repair ★★★★★

Automobile Body Repairing & Painting
Address: 1008 N Robin St, Nixa
Phone: (417) 724-0707

Superior Auto Service ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Truck Service & Repair, Brake Repair
Address: 620 W Main St, Smithton
Phone: (660) 826-0578

Springfield Transmission Inc ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Parts & Supplies, Auto Transmission
Address: 1548 N Glenstone Ave, Branson-West
Phone: (417) 831-5960

Auto blog

For thousands of US auto workers, the downturn is already here

Thu, Jun 22 2017

LORDSTOWN, Ohio - Wall Street is fretting that the auto industry is heading for a downturn, but for thousands of workers at General Motors factories in the United States, the hard times are already here. Matt Streb, 36, was one of 1,200 workers laid off on Jan. 20 - inauguration day for President Donald Trump - when GM canceled the third shift at its Lordstown small-car factory here. Sales of the Chevrolet Cruze sedan, the only vehicle the plant makes, have nosedived as consumers switch to SUVs and pickup trucks. Streb is looking for another job, but employers are wary because they assume he will quit whenever GM calls him back. "I get it," said Streb, who has a degree in communications, "but it's frustrating." Layoffs at Lordstown and other auto plants point to a broader challenge for the economy in Midwestern manufacturing states and for the Trump administration. "This is about economics, not what Trump says. Even if Trump went out and bought 10,000 Cruzes a month, he wouldn't get the third shift back here." The auto industry's boom from 2010 through last year was a major driver for manufacturing job creation. The fading of that boom threatens prospects for US industrial output and job creation that were central to Trump's victory in Ohio and other manufacturing states. "This is about economics, not what Trump says," said Robert Morales, president of United Auto Workers (UAW) union Local 1714, which represents workers at GM's stamping plant at Lordstown. "Even if Trump went out and bought 10,000 Cruzes a month, he wouldn't get the third shift back here." Last week the Federal Reserve said factory output fell 0.4 percent in May, the second decline in three months, due partly to a 2 percent drop in motor vehicles and parts production. Mark Muro, a senior fellow at the Brookings Institution, has compiled data from government sources that show the auto industry punching higher than its weight in job creation in recent years - accounting for between 60 percent and 80 percent of all US manufacturing jobs added in 2015 and 2016. In the first quarter of this year, the auto industry accounted for less than 2 percent of the 45,000 manufacturing jobs created. "There's no argument with the idea that auto has been pulling the manufacturing sled up the mountain for the last three or four years," Muro said.

Ward's calls out Ford's EcoBoost engines for their crummy fuel economy

Thu, Jan 8 2015

With a name like EcoBoost, one might expect Ford's line of turbocharged engines to be somewhat, um, economical. In other words, replacing displacement with a turbocharger is supposed to deliver better fuel economy. Based on the experience time and time again of multiple Autoblog editors, your author included, this is simply not the case. Now, Ward's is calling out the cruddy efficiency numbers of Ford's EcoBoost line of engines. The column dresses down not just the new 2.7-liter V6 of the 2015 F-150, but also the 2.3-liter of the Mustang, the 1.5-liter from the Fusion and the 3.2-liter PowerStroke diesel found in the Transit, while also explaining why just one Ford engine was named to Ward's 10 Best Engines list. In its testing of all four engines, Ward's editors never came even remotely close to matching the 2.7's claimed 26 miles per gallon (for two-wheel-drive models), with the truck's computer indicating between 17.6 and 19 mpg over a 250-odd-mile run. Calculating the fuel economy manually revealed an even more depressing 15.6 miles per gallon. Criticisms with the 2.3-liter four-cylinder focused on its strange soundtrack, although it was business as usual with the 1.5-liter and 3.2 diesel, with Ward's criticizing the fuel economy of both engines. The 1.5, which Ward's claims is sold as a hybrid alternative, failed to get over 30 miles per gallon, while the five-cylinder turbodiesel's figures couldn't stand up against FCA's 3.0-liter EcoDiesel. The entire column really is worth a read, especially if you were disappointed in Ward's decision to only salute Ford's three-cylinder EcoBoost while shunning the rest of the company's new turbocharged mills.

2020 Ford Escape, Lincoln Corsair ace crash tests, earn Top Safety Pick from IIHS

Fri, Nov 15 2019

The redesigned 2020 Ford Escape and its platform-mate, the 2020 Lincoln Corsair, have both just completed their bout of crash tests at the hands of the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety, and while they did not emerge unscathed, they did come away with the agency's Top Safety Pick Award. One caveat: The rating only applies to the Escape equipped with the available LED headlights, which were deemed Acceptable. Similarly, the Corsair needs the available curve-adaptive LED headlights, also rated Acceptable, in order to achieve Top Safety Pick. The Escape's standard halogen headlights scored only a Marginal rating, while the Corsair's base LED headlights were deemed Poor due to glare. Those low headlight ratings knock the vehicles out of contention for Top Safety Pick. Had either vehicle offered headlights able to achieve a Good rating, that would have been enough to get them the agency's Top Safety Pick+ rating. Outside of their headlights, the 2020 Escape and Corsair acquitted themselves well. The Escape saw a big improvement in the difficult small-overlap front crash test, going from a Poor result in the previous generation to Good with the new one. The Corsair performed identically, and both achieved Good ratings in all six crash tests. The IIHS also tests automatic emergency-braking systems, and the standard and optional systems in the Escape and the Corsair both earned Superior ratings.