2004 Ford Ranger Supercab 4wd Pick Up Truck on 2040-cars
Salem, Oregon, United States
Vehicle Title:Clear
Engine:4.0L V6 SOHC 12V
Fuel Type:Gasoline
For Sale By:Private Seller
Transmission:Automatic
Make: Ford
Cab Type (For Trucks Only): Extended Cab
Model: Ranger
Warranty: Vehicle does NOT have an existing warranty
Trim: SuperCab 4WD
Options: 4-Wheel Drive, CD Player, Tilt Wheel, Tow Receiver, In Bed Storage, Rear Slide Window, Rear Cab Seating, Tinted Glass, AM/FM Radio
Drive Type: 4WD
Safety Features: Anti-Lock Brakes, Driver Airbag, Passenger Airbag
Mileage: 128,177
Power Options: Air Conditioning, Cruise Control, Power Locks, Power Windows
Exterior Color: Pewter
Interior Color: Gray
Number of Cylinders: 6
Disability Equipped: No
Ford Ranger for Sale
2000 ford ranger xlt extented cab ffv rust free clean(US $4,600.00)
2010 ford ranger reg cab 4 cyl auto ac only 49051 miles(US $12,990.00)
1989 ford ranger supercab 4+4 v-6 runs good,daily driven.(US $2,400.00)
1978 ford f150 4x4 lariat shortbed beautiful truck!
1999 ford ranger super duty - excellent condition!(US $5,000.00)
2003 ford ranger edge v-6 auto clean carfax runs great no reserve auction
Auto Services in Oregon
The Parkrose Garage ★★★★★
Racers Automotive ★★★★★
Portland Window Tinting ★★★★★
PM Automotive ★★★★★
Pioneer Auto Wholesale ★★★★★
Oregon Engine Rebuilders ★★★★★
Auto blog
Ford's Farley apologizes for saying Blue Oval tracks customers with GPS
Fri, 10 Jan 2014Ford marketing head honcho Jim Farley made waves at CES this week by telling show attendees, "We know everyone who breaks the law, we know when you're doing it." according to a report by Business Insider. Farley continued by saying, "We have GPS in your car, so we know what you're doing. By the way, we don't supply that data to anyone."
Farley has since amended his statement, saying that Ford dose not, in fact, track its customers in their cars "without their approval or consent."
Apparently carried away with a hypothetical notion, Farley was attempting to describe how Ford might be able to employee aggregated user data for things like accurate traffic reporting and pattern spotting. A Ford spokesperson confirmed with Business Insider that its GPS units are not sharing the whereabouts of drivers, though there are a few on-board services that might do so. After opting in to the services (and presumably being made aware of any/all tracking and data collection), Ford's Sync Services Directions and Crew Chief software do, in fact, allow data collection as a means of improving both systems. Farley added that the opt-in data is not shared, even when being tracked.
Ford to build next F-150, outgoing model concurrently?
Wed, 24 Jul 2013Ford is rumored to be considering concurrent production for old and new F-150 models in a bid to minimize supply chain disruptions and inventory. Automotive News is reporting that the Blue Oval will build both the current F-150 and its replacement, which we showed you testing just last month, side by side for about half a year before switching over entirely to next-generation production.
As IHS Automotive analyst Mike Jackson told AN, "In order to ramp up, you have to retool...and that means you have to take capacity offline." Building both models alongside could allow Ford to cope with the still strong demand for the current F-150, while populating dealer supplies and working out supply chain kinks for the new model before making a full-time switch.
A loss of capacity when demand is so strong, even for a short period, could spell bad news for Ford, which nets an estimated 90 percent of its global profit on pickups and large SUVs. As AN states, Ford produces the F-150 in both Kansas City, Missouri and Dearborn, Michigan, which allows it to maintain some degree of flexibility in production. The new F-150 is expected to arrive at the 2014 North American International Auto Show as a 2015 model, with a design inspired by the Atlas Concept first shown at the Detroit Auto Show last January.
Poor headlights cause 40 cars to miss IIHS Top Safety Pick rating
Mon, Aug 6 2018Over the past few months, we've noticed a number of cars and SUVs that have come incredibly close to earning one of the IIHS's highest accolades, the Top Safety Pick rating. They have great crash test scores and solid automatic emergency braking and forward collision warning systems. What trips them up is headlights. That got us wondering, how many vehicles are there that are coming up short because they don't have headlights that meet the organization's criteria for an "Acceptable" or "Good" rating. This is a revision made after 2017, a year in which headlights weren't factored in for this specific award. This is also why why some vehicles, such as the Ford F-150, might have had the award last year, but have lost it for this year. We reached out to someone at IIHS to find out. He responded with the following car models. Depending on how you count, a whopping 40 models crash well enough to receive the rating, but don't get it because their headlights are either "Poor" or "Marginal." We say depending on how you count because the IIHS actual counts truck body styles differently, and the Infiniti Q70 is a special case. Apparently the version of the Q70 that has good headlights doesn't have adequate forward collision prevention technology. And the one that has good forward collision tech doesn't have good enough headlights. We've provided the entire list of vehicles below in alphabetical order. Interestingly, it seems the Volkswagen Group is having the most difficulty providing good headlights with its otherwise safe cars. It had the most models on the list at 9 split between Audi and Volkswagen. GM is next in line with 7 models. It is worth noting again that though these vehicles have subpar headlights and don't quite earn Top Safety Pick awards, that doesn't mean they're unsafe. They all score well enough in crash testing and forward collision prevention that they would get the coveted award if the lights were better.