Find or Sell Used Cars, Trucks, and SUVs in USA

1999 Ford Ranger Xlt Extended Cab 4x4 4wd V6 Auto Low Miles! on 2040-cars

Year:1999 Mileage:125759 Color: Green /
 Gray
Location:

Piggott, Arkansas, United States

Piggott, Arkansas, United States
Advertising:
Transmission:Automatic
Body Type:Extended Cab Pickup
Vehicle Title:Clear
Engine:3.0L 182Cu. In. V6 FLEX OHV Naturally Aspirated
Fuel Type:FLEX
Condition:

Used

VIN (Vehicle Identification Number)
: 1FTZR15V6XPA99531
Year: 1999
Number of Cylinders: 6
Make: Ford
Model: Ranger
Trim: XLT Extended Cab 4WD
Options: CD Player
Drive Type: 4WD
Power Options: Air Conditioning
Mileage: 125,759
Exterior Color: Green
Warranty: Vehicle does NOT have an existing warranty
Interior Color: Gray

It's hard to find a truck like this. This is a 99 Ranger 4WD step side with only 125,000 miles. It is in very good condition. It is an XLT but has crank windows. It has a V6, sliding back glass, tow hitch, and much more. The AC blows very cold.

I don't think this truck will last long. Give me a call at 870-598-4340.

Auto Services in Arkansas

United Motor Service ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Auto Engine Rebuilding, Engine Rebuilding & Exchange
Address: 500 W Broadway St, Morrilton
Phone: (501) 354-4340

Tim Parker Chrysler Dodge Jeep ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, New Car Dealers, Automobile Body Repairing & Painting
Address: 4722 Central Ave, Hot-Springs
Phone: (888) 977-7806

Star Windshield ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Parts & Supplies, Windshield Repair
Address: 225 Buena Vista Rd, Mountain-Pine
Phone: (501) 525-1504

Schroder Tire Co ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Tire Dealers, Wheels-Aligning & Balancing
Address: 5094 Highway 62 E, Flippin
Phone: (870) 453-5555

Safelite AutoGlass - Little Rock ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Windshield Repair, Automobile Accessories
Address: 1306 S University Ave, Little-Rock
Phone: (501) 376-0711

S S Undercar ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service
Address: 2101 S Main St # B, Stuttgart
Phone: (870) 673-3531

Auto blog

Hennessey Ford GT sets 267.6-MPH record at Texas Mile [w/videos]

Mon, 25 Mar 2013

The record-setting Hennessey-powered camouflage Ford GT we showed you at this time last year headed back to the Texas Mile and managed to bring home yet another record. As you may recollect, last year saw Mark Heidraker's machine sprint to a record 257.7 mph thanks to propulsion from its twin-turbo 5.7-liter V8. The big mill sucks down race gas, and this year the creation pulled off a 267.6-mph run over the weekend. That feat set a new record for the event. Something tells us neither Heidraker nor Hennessey are done squeezing more thrust from this machine.
This particular Ford GT has already gone through a number of permutations. Hennessey started by tweaking the factory supercharger set up before abandoning the blower in favor of two turbos. Since then, the crew has poked and prodded it to coerce as much grunt as possible out of the car. We expect Hennessey will probably come out with a video of the record-setting run shortly, but in the meantime, you can see a couple of videos of the car's runs in Texas below (one of which actually captures the record run). Enjoy.

Why the Detroit Three should merge their engine operations

Tue, Dec 22 2015

GM and FCA should consider a smaller merger that could still save them billions of dollars, and maybe lure Ford into the deal. Fiat-Chrysler CEO Sergio Marchionne would love to see his company merge with General Motors. But GM's board of directors essentially told him to go pound sand. So now what? The boardroom battle started when Mr. Marchionne published a study called Confessions of a Capital Junkie. In it, Sergio detailed the amount of capital the auto industry wastes every year with duplicate investments. And he documented how other industries provide superior returns. He's right, of course. Other industries earn much better returns on their invested capital. And there's a danger that one day the investors will turn their backs on the auto industry and look to other business sectors where they can make more money. But even with powerful arguments Marchionne couldn't convince GM to take over FCA. And while that fight may now be over, GM and FCA should consider a smaller merger that could still save them billions of dollars, and maybe lure Ford into the deal. No doubt this suggestion will send purists into convulsions, but so be it. The Detroit Three should seriously consider merging their powertrain operations, even though that's a sacrilege in an industry that still considers the engine the "heart" of the car. These automakers have built up considerable brand equity in some of their engines. But the vast majority of American car buyers could not tell you what kind of engine they have under the hood. More importantly, most car buyers really don't care what kind of engine or transmission they have as long as it's reliable, durable, and efficient. Combining that production would give the Detroit Three the kind of scale that no one else could match. There are exceptions, of course. Hardcore enthusiasts care deeply about the powertrains in their cars. So do most diesel, plug-in, and hybrid owners. But all of them account for maybe 15 percent of the car-buying public. So that means about 85 percent of car buyers don't care where their engine and transmission came from, just as they don't know or care who supplied the steel, who made the headlamps, or who delivered the seats on a just-in-time basis. It's immaterial to them. And that presents the automakers with an opportunity to achieve a staggering level of manufacturing scale. In the NAFTA market alone, GM, Ford, and FCA will build nearly nine million engines and nine million transmissions this year.

2016 Ford Explorer First Drive [w/video]

Mon, May 18 2015

I was still young and impressionable when Jurassic Park hit the big screen, and that movie forever imprinted the Ford Explorer in my mind. You remember the scene, but I'll describe it anyway: It's dark, raining and there's no power. The off-screen footsteps of a tyrannosaurus send shockwaves through the standing water in a plastic cup and the rain-soaked muddy roads. Seconds later, the toothy end of the movie's biggest predator crushes through the roof of a highligher-green-and-yellow Ford Explorer, causing all manner of mayhem to the SUV's occupants inside. It's not lost on me that the Ford Explorer used in the movie is, in reality, a dinosaur itself. When the seminal Explorer hit the scene in 1991 it was based on the guts of the Ranger pickup truck, which was no spring chicken itself. Ford's first real foray into the then-burgeoning SUV marketplace was meant to compete against vehicles like the Jeep Cherokee and Chevy Blazer, along with Japanese models such as the Nissan Pathfinder and Toyota 4Runner. In those early days, none of these vehicles were sold based on the merits of their car-like ride and handling or superior fuel economy. Nowadays, the discerning car shopper wants the looks of an off-road-ready SUV, but the inherent compromises and need for any serious rock-crawling capability faded away years ago. The current Ford Explorer is a prime example of this successful visual hypocrisy, with its SUV-like styling listed as the number-one reason for buying on customer surveys. SUV-like styling is one thing, SUV-like guts are another. In 2011 the Explorer went from its traditional truck-based chassis to Ford's D4 platform, based loosely on the Taurus and shared with the Flex. As with the rest of the unibody crossover world, that means the current Explorer offers an excellent ride, the higher seating position that buyers want, and a useful third row for growing families. None of that inherent family-car goodness goes away for 2016. With class-leading sales already in the bag, Ford hopes its latest Explorer will attract new buyers due to the availability of a 2.3-liter EcoBoost four-cylinder engine and an upper-crust Platinum trim level. Based on some time sitting inside and inspecting the high-content Platinum model (albeit without a drive in this trim level) I believe Ford's claim that this is most luxurious vehicle ever to wear a Blue Oval. Only not all its ovals inside are blue.