Find or Sell Used Cars, Trucks, and SUVs in USA

1996 Ford Ranger Xlt Standard Cab Pickup 2-door 2.3l on 2040-cars

Year:1996 Mileage:150000 Color: Black /
 Gray
Location:

Heath, Ohio, United States

Heath, Ohio, United States
Advertising:
Transmission:Automatic
Engine:2.3L 140Cu. In. l4 GAS SOHC Naturally Aspirated
Vehicle Title:Clear
Body Type:Standard Cab Pickup
Fuel Type:GAS
For Sale By:Private Seller
VIN: 1FTCR10A8TPB60706 Year: 1996
Exterior Color: Black
Make: Ford
Interior Color: Gray
Model: Ranger
Trim: XLT Standard Cab Pickup 2-Door
Warranty: Vehicle does NOT have an existing warranty
Drive Type: RWD
Options: Cassette Player
Number of Cylinders: 4
Safety Features: Anti-Lock Brakes, Driver Airbag
Power Options: Air Conditioning
Disability Equipped: No
Mileage: 150,000
Sub Model: XLT
Condition: UsedA vehicle is considered used if it has been registered and issued a title. Used vehicles have had at least one previous owner. The condition of the exterior, interior and engine can vary depending on the vehicle's history. See the seller's listing for full details and description of any imperfections.Seller Notes:"Have a 1996 Ford Ranger step-side 2.3 L Auto. This truck runs and drives great.Does not use no oil. Body & interior is fair.Good tires.Needs work on driver side rear wheel well and driver door.A/C needs charged.The bad is the frame needs work near the driver side rear spring shackle. I drive it every day to work and back. Do not have the time or resources to fix it. Would make someone a good project or parts truck."

Have a 1996 Ford Ranger step-side 2.3 L Auto. This truck runs and drives great.Does not use no oil. Body & interior is fair.Good tires.Needs work on driver side rear wheel well and driver door.A/C needs charged.The bad is the frame needs work near the driver side rear spring shackle. I drive it every day to work and back. Do not have the time or resources to fix it. Would make someone a good project or parts truck.

Auto Services in Ohio

West Side Garage ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Electric Service, Brake Repair
Address: 429 Front St, Millersport
Phone: (740) 653-0772

Wally Armour Chrysler Dodge Jeep Ram ★★★★★

Used Car Dealers, Used Truck Dealers, Credit Repair Service
Address: 1950 W State St, Beloit
Phone: (888) 689-9957

Valvoline Instant Oil Change ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Auto Oil & Lube, Automotive Tune Up Service
Address: 5363 Dixie Hwy, Mayfield-Village
Phone: (513) 829-9733

Tucker Bros Auto Wrecking Co ★★★★★

Automobile Parts & Supplies, Automobile Salvage, Used & Rebuilt Auto Parts
Address: 760 Hickory Ln, Mansfield
Phone: (855) 877-3557

Tire Discounters Inc ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Tire Dealers, Auto Oil & Lube
Address: 795 Sunbury Rd, Magnetic-Springs
Phone: (740) 203-2926

Terry`s Auto Service ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Truck Service & Repair, Brake Repair
Address: 10620 Main St, Struthers
Phone: (330) 391-7437

Auto blog

2021 Ford F-150 Raptor vs. 2021 Ram 1500 TRX | How they compare on paper

Wed, Feb 3 2021

Yep, the F-150 Raptor is back, though you'd be forgiven for not noticing that it ever left. Ford's off-road model is taking a few months off to accommodate the broader 2021 F-150 redesign from which it benefits. And the fine folks over at Ram took full advantage of that lull to launch the new 702-horsepower TRX, which in one big way (hint: it's the engine) stands at the top of the performance pickup heap. Ford says that's all going to change in 2022, but for now, the Raptor returns with a familiar 3.5-liter EcoBoost V6 (albeit with an unspecified power figure) along with several other revisions to Ford's tried-and-true formula. The 2020 Raptor was already a worthy adversary to the beefy Ram despite the latter's definitive power advantage, so how has that picture evolved for 2021? Let's take a look.    Powertrain This is a big question mark for the Ford right now, but it seems reasonable to expect a bit more than the outgoing model's 450 horsepower and 510 pound-feet of torque. The TRX's Hellcat-sourced powerplant needs no introduction. Its 702 horsepower will easily eclipse whatever Ford has planned for its 3.5-liter twin-turbo V6, even if the V6 has more grunt than it did before, but that's OK. It's not the base-model Raptor's job to dethrone the TRX in straight-line speed; that honor will go to the 2022 Raptor R. We also don't know what the Raptor's fuel economy will be like, but we suspect it will be better than the TRX's, if only slightly.  Both these trucks come with four-wheel-drive standard, and they both have a number of drive modes that alter the powertrain’s characteristics depending on the terrain. Baja mode transforms the trucks into the desert runners that they both are at heart, but theyÂ’re plenty capable of crawling around rocks, too. We wonÂ’t know for certain which is best at specific tasks until we can get them both on (or off) equal ground. Suspension / off-roading capability And the ground is where things narrow significantly, both on- and off-paper. The specs are freakishly similar when we compare ground clearance, approach/departure angles and water fording, but the Raptor's leapfrog here is clearly evident. Both trucks utilize a coil-sprung rear suspension now, with Ford having abandoned the Raptor's previous leaf-spring setup with the redesign.  The two use different shocks to handle 100-mph-plus desert running.

2019 Detroit Auto Show Special | Autoblog Podcast #568

Wed, Jan 16 2019

This week's Autoblog Podcast is a special one, recorded from Cobo Center in Detroit, site of the 2019 North American International Auto Show (NAIAS). Editor-in-Chief Greg Migliore is first joined by Senior Editor Alex Kierstein and Consumer Editor Jeremy Korzeniewski to talk about the Toyota Supra, Ford Shelby GT500 and Subaru STI S209. Then Senior Editor, Green, John Snyder and Associate Editor Joel Stocksdale join Greg to discuss the Nissan IMs Concept, new Ford Explorer and Kia Telluride, before going over the Editors' Picks for the best cars of the Detroit Auto Show. Autoblog Podcast #568 Get The Podcast iTunes – Subscribe to the Autoblog Podcast in iTunes RSS – Add the Autoblog Podcast feed to your RSS aggregator MP3 – Download the MP3 directly Rundown 2020 Toyota Supra 2020 Ford Mustang Shelby GT500 2019 Subaru WRX STI S209 Nissan IMs Concept 2020 Ford Explorer (including ST and Hybrid) 2020 Kia Telluride Best in Show: 2019 Detroit Auto Show Editors' Picks Feedback Email – Podcast@Autoblog.com Review the show on iTunes Related Video:

Ford F-150 extended cab struggles in IIHS small overlap test

Thu, Jul 30 2015

Update: Ford issued a statement to Autoblog to clarify the results of the test and dispute the IIHS repair cost estimates. A quote from a Ford representative has been added to the story. See the full statement below the IIHS press release. Of all the vehicles undergoing crash tests this year, few will be as closely watched as the new 2015 Ford F-150. That's not only because it remains the top-selling vehicle in America year after year, but also because it features an aluminum body instead of steel. While the F-150 performed well in the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety test, one factor prompted the institute to undertake a second round of testing that uncovered a problem. Like most full-size pickups, the F-150 is available in several cab styles: the regular two-door, the extended SuperCab and the four-door SuperCrew. The IIHS typically takes the most popular version of a particular model for testing, and in the Ford truck's case that meant the SuperCrew. The F-150 performed well in all the tests the IIHS put it through, including the small overlap test in which the vehicle is driven 40 miles per hour into a five-foot-tall barrier impacting the front left corner of the vehicle. Its overall performance in the tests earned the F-150 a Top Safety Pick rating, missing out on the higher Top Safety Pick + rating only because it doesn't have an automatic braking system. But how do the other versions of Ford's best-seller hold up? Given that even less popular versions of the F-150 still sell more than many other vehicles on the market, the IIHS put an extended cab through the same battery of tests. It performed comparably except in one area: the small overlap test. In that case, the extended cab model's steering column was pushed eight inches into the cabin (dangerously close to the crash test dummy's chest), the dummy's head missed the airbag almost entirely and hit the instrument panel, and the dummy's legs would risk sustaining "moderate" injuries. The reason for the disparity is that "Ford added structural elements to the crew cab's front frame to earn a good small overlap rating and a Top Safety Pick award but didn't do the same for the extended cab," according to the Institute's chief research officer David Zuby. "That shortchanges buyers who might pick the extended cab thinking it offers the same protection in this type of crash as the crew cab.