Find or Sell Used Cars, Trucks, and SUVs in USA

1969 Ford Ranchero on 2040-cars

Year:1969 Mileage:117000 Color: Lt Blue /
 Dk Blue
Location:

Raymore, Missouri, United States

Raymore, Missouri, United States
Advertising:
Body Type:U/K
Fuel Type:GAS
Engine:4.1L 250Cu. In. l6 GAS Naturally Aspirated
Transmission:Automatic
Vehicle Title:Clear
VIN: 9A47L287289 Year: 1969
Make: Ford
Model: Ranchero
Mileage: 117,000
Trim: Base
Exterior Color: Lt Blue
Interior Color: Dk Blue
Drive Type: U/K
Number of Cylinders: 6
Condition: Used: A vehicle is considered used if it has been registered and issued a title. Used vehicles have had at least one previous owner. The condition of the exterior, interior and engine can vary depending on the vehicle's history. See the seller's listing for full details and description of any imperfections. ... 

1969 FORD RANCHERO. IT'S SOLID AND  IS A MOSTLY ORIGINAL VEHICLE. IT HAS VERY LITTLE RUST AND ALL ORIGNAL SHEET METAL, EXCLUDING RIGHT FRONT FENDER. THE ORIGINAL COLOR IS A VERY LIGHT BLUE WITH A REPAINT YEARS AGO OF A DARKER LIGHT BLUE. THIS RANCHERO RUNS AND DRIVES GREAT. IT STILL HAS ITS ORIGINAL 6 CYLINDER WITH AUTOMATIC TRANSMISSION. STANDARD STEERING AND BRAKES. THE INTERIOR IS IN GOOD SHAPE. THE FRONT SEAT WAS RECOVERED AT SOME POINT. THE ORIGINAL OWNERS MANUAL IS IN THE GLOVE BOX. THE FLOORS ARE ORIGINAL AND SOLID WITH VERY LITTLE RUST. PLEASE SEE PICTURES. 


THE BAD: THE BRAKES NEED TO BE BLEED, BUT WORK IF YOU PUMP THEM A COUPLE OF TIMES. NEEDS THE MUFFLER REPAIRED.  THE DOOR GLASS NEEDS TO BE ALIGNED IN THE TRACKS. I DON'T THINK THE ORIGINAL AM RADIO WORKS.

THIS RANCHERO WOULD BE A GREAT DAILY DRIVER AND IF I DIDN'T ALREADY HAVE SEVERAL DAILY DRIVERS I WOULDN'T BE SELLING IT.  I'M RELISTING IT AGAIN, SO PLEASE BID TO BUY. I HAVE A VERY LOW RESERVE AND THIS RANCHERO WILL MOST LIKELY SELL.

PLEASE FEEL FREE TO COME INSPECT PRIOR TO THE AUCTION ENDING. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTION PLEASE EMAIL AND OR CALL ME. THANK YOU LOOKING, CHRIS 816.590.7660.

Auto Services in Missouri

Yocum Automotive ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Auto Oil & Lube, Tire Dealers
Address: 906 US Highway 60 E, Halltown
Phone: (417) 732-6430

Wright Automotive ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Auto Oil & Lube, Truck Service & Repair
Address: 109 James St, Rayville
Phone: (816) 532-8982

Winchester Cleaners ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Drapery & Curtain Cleaners, Dry Cleaners & Laundries
Address: 14622 Manchester Rd, Saint-Ann
Phone: (636) 227-7884

Taylor`s Auto Salvage ★★★★★

New Car Dealers, Automobile Body Repairing & Painting, Used Car Dealers
Address: 6898 Saint Charles Rock Rd, Overland
Phone: (314) 726-6181

STS Car Care & Towing ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Parts & Supplies, Towing
Address: 6507 W Florissant Ave, Jennings
Phone: (314) 658-9559

Stepney`s Towing ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Body Repairing & Painting, Automobile Parts & Supplies
Address: Brentwood
Phone: (314) 713-2079

Auto blog

American automakers fall in latest Fortune 500 rankings

Fri, 10 May 2013

Not that it means anything beyond bragging rights, but if you're fixated on the positions of domestic automakers on the annual Fortune 500 list, both General Motors and Ford are still on it but they've slipped a couple of notches. The list ranks American companies and they're ordered solely by revenue. GM, fifth last year, came in seventh, while Ford fell from ninth to tenth even though both companies saw small gains in annual revenue.
GM's $152.3 billion in revenue was less than a third of that of the first company on the list: Wal-Mart, which regained the title from Exxon Mobil. Berkshire Hathaway and Apple are the firms that moved GM down. Ford, displaced by energy company Valero, had $134.3 billion in revenue.
On a side note, profitability isn't a factor, but both GM and Ford were down in this year's list compared to last year's: GM declined from $9.2 billion to $6.2 billion, Ford fell from $20.2 billion to $5.6 billion. If profits were included, Exxon Mobil would probably still be king: although the energy company made almost $20 billion less in revenue than Wal-Mart's $469.2 billion, it posted $44.9 billion in profit compared to Wal-Mart's $17 billion.

Ford ending Focus, C-Max production in Michigan after 2018

Thu, Jul 9 2015

Ford will no longer produce the Focus and C-Max at its Michigan Assembly Plant in Wayne, MI, beyond 2018. United Auto Workers vice president Jimmy Settles confirmed this in a letter Thursday, which was posted on Twitter. According to the UAW Ford Department's tweet, production of the Focus and C-Max will shift to Mexico. Ford isn't confirming this, though – a spokesperson tells Autoblog, "We didn't say that." Instead, Ford issued the following statement about the matter: We will move production of the next-generation Ford Focus and C-Max, which currently are built at Michigan Assembly Plant, beginning in 2018. We actively are pursuing future vehicle alternatives to produce at Michigan Assembly and will discuss this issue with UAW leadership as part of the upcoming negotiations. Earlier this year, Ford announced layoffs of 700 employees at the Michigan Assembly Plant, citing slow sales of both the Focus and C-Max. The MAP was once heralded as a flexible, futuristic facility when it was retooled for C-segment car production in 2009. Prior to that, the Ford Expedition and Lincoln Navigator SUVs were built at the Wayne facility. It also produced the iconic Ford Bronco. The future of the MAP is uncertain, but the UAW remains hopeful. In Settles' letter, he writes, "We are extremely confident that a new product commitment will be secured during the upcoming 2015 negotiations and that the Michigan Assembly Plant will maintain a full production schedule." Related Video:

Ford Mustang Mach-E fails Sweden's moose test

Wed, Sep 29 2021

The infamous moose test has claimed another casualty. This time it's the Ford Mustang Mach-E AWD Long Range, which was tested in an electric four-way alongside the Tesla Model Y, Hyundai Ioniq 5 and Skoda Enyaq iV (an electric utility vehicle closely related to the Volkswagen ID.4 that is sold in the United States). According to the Swedish testers at Teknikens Varld, Ford's electric car not only failed to hit the speed necessary for a passing grade, it didn't perform well at slower speeds, either. To pass the outlet's moose test, a car has to complete a rapid left-right-straight S-shaped pattern marked by cones at a speed of at least 72 km/h (44.7 miles per hour). The test is designed to mimic the type of avoidance maneuver a driver would have to take in order to avoid hitting something that wandered into the road, which in Sweden may be a moose but could just as easily be a deer or some other member of the animal kingdom elsewhere in the world, or possibly a child or car backing into the motorway. Not only is the maneuver very aggressive, it's also performed with weights belted into each seat and more weight added to the cargo area to hit the vehicle's maximum allowable carrying capacity. The Mustang Mach-E only managed to complete the moose test at 68 km/h (42.3 mph), well below the passing-grade threshold. Even at much lower speeds, Teknikens Varld says the Mach-E (which boasts the highest carrying capacity and was therefore loaded with more weight than the rest of the vehicles tested in this quartet) is "too soft in the chassis" and suffers from "too slow steering." Proving that it is indeed possible to pass the test, the Hyundai and Skoda completed the maneuver at the 44.7-mph figure required for a passing grade and the Tesla did it at 46.6 mph, albeit with less weight in the cargo area. It's not clear whether other versions of the Mustang Mach-E would pass the test. It's also unknown if Ford will make any changes to its chassis tuning or electronic stability control software, as some other automakers have done after a poor performance from Teknikens Varld, to improve its performance in the moose test. Related video: