Find or Sell Used Cars, Trucks, and SUVs in USA

1940 Ford Pickup on 2040-cars

Year:1940 Mileage:50
Location:

Wichita, Kansas, United States

Wichita, Kansas, United States
Advertising:
Engine:1979 Chrysler 360
Vehicle Title:Clear
Condition:
Used: A vehicle is considered used if it has been registered and issued a title. Used vehicles have had at least one previous owner. The condition of the exterior, interior and engine can vary depending on the vehicle's history. See the seller's listing for full details and description of any imperfections. ...
VIN (Vehicle Identification Number)
: 54432171
Year: 1940
Make: Ford
Drive Type: automatic
Model: Other Pickups
Mileage: 50
Trim: none

This 1/2 ton pickup has less than 100 miles on the new build.

Extremely nice fenders and sheet metal on the entire truck.  Has a new metal bed with plywood base with powder coated skid plate with stainless strips.  Also stake pockets and top rails have been capped.  New tail-gate.  The truck has been chopped 2" with the back window left the original size.  New burgandy roll and pleat leather interior.  Mercedes-style gray carpet.  New tires and 5-spoke polished Halabrand wheels.  Fresh 1979 Chrysler 360 motor and transmission.  Has 8" Ford rear end, Mustang II front end with rack and pinion steering and disc brakes.  Also has a power booster on brakes.  Tilt GM steering column, vintage heat and air, Kenwood stereo, new bumpers, new Drake headlight rings.  The truck is Folkstone gray.  Stainless steel exhaust, deeper stainless steel gas tank.  Gas fill is located under license plate.  Hood has been filled and peaked.  Has new tinted glass and rubber seals.

The man who built this truck has built several nice street rods here in Wichita.

I'm setting the reserve on this truck at $35,000 because this is an exteremly nice, well-built truck that drives and handles well.

I'm only selling this truck to be able to purchase an early Ford coupe.

$1000.00 deposit due within 48 hours of sale.  The balance due in CASH when you pickup the vehicle. 

 

Auto Services in Kansas

Warner Automotive ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Tire Dealers
Address: 2485 W Oklahoma Ave, Ulysses
Phone: (620) 356-5599

Walter`s Tire & Service ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Parts & Supplies, Tire Dealers
Address: 5500 King Hill Ave, Elwood
Phone: (816) 238-1005

Sunflower Auto Plaza ★★★★★

New Car Dealers, Used Car Dealers
Address: 103 W 4th St, Tonganoxie
Phone: (913) 845-0002

Snyder`s Garage Inc ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service
Address: 3419 E Harry St, Haysville
Phone: (316) 684-4043

Rob Sight Auto Plz ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, New Car Dealers
Address: 13901 Washington St, Stanley
Phone: (913) 826-6492

Norris Collision Center ★★★★★

Automobile Body Repairing & Painting, Automobile Parts & Supplies, Auto Body Parts
Address: 19918 W Kellogg Dr, Goddard
Phone: (316) 794-1161

Auto blog

Acura Integra, Cadillac CT4-V Blackwing, Porsche Taycan | Autoblog Podcast #721

Fri, Mar 18 2022

In this episode of the Autoblog Podcast, Editor-in-Chief Greg Migliore is joined by Yahoo Finance Senior Reporter Pras Subramanian. They kick things off by talking about driving the Cadillac CT4-V Blackwing and Porsche Taycan. In this week's news, they discuss the production reveal of the 2023 Acura Integra, Tesla's latest price hike, and Ford leaving the rear climate controls out of Explorers due to the chip shortage. Finally, they talk about the current state of affairs at Stellantis as the company plays catch-up with electric vehicles. Send us your questions for the Mailbag and Spend My Money at: Podcast@Autoblog.com. Autoblog Podcast #721 Get The Podcast Apple Podcasts – Subscribe to the Autoblog Podcast in iTunes Spotify – Subscribe to the Autoblog Podcast on Spotify RSS – Add the Autoblog Podcast feed to your RSS aggregator MP3 – Download the MP3 directly Rundown Cars we're driving 2022 Cadillac CT4-V Blackwing 2022 Porsche Taycan 2023 Acura Integra production specs and photos revealed Tesla increases prices yet again Ford to sell Explorer SUVs missing rear climate controls due to chip crunch Analyzing the state of Stellantis Feedback Email – Podcast@Autoblog.com Review the show on Apple Podcasts Autoblog is now live on your smart speakers and voice assistants with the audio Autoblog Daily Digest. Say “Hey Google, play the news from Autoblog” or "Alexa, open Autoblog" to get your favorite car website in audio form every day. A narrator will take you through the biggest stories or break down one of our comprehensive test drives. Related video:

Ford, Ram in heavy-duty towing spat

Mon, 28 Jul 2014

Every pickup truck commercial has the brand trying to convince us that its model is the biggest, brawniest vehicle on the block. But Ford and Ram appear ready to really throw down the gauntlet and scrap over the towing figures for their heavy-duty models, and it could potentially end up in court.
The issue revolves around what it means to be best in class. Ford claims that its 2015 F-450 (pictured above) has a max tow rating of 31,200 pounds, compared to 30,000 pounds for the Ram 3500 (right). However, both companies market these heavy haulers as having the top towing in their class. According to Automotive News, Ford is threatening legal action if Ram doesn't back down.
The situation isn't as simple as just comparing the numbers, though. First, the two companies calculate their towing capacities differently. Ram adheres to the SAE J2807 rating, while Ford uses its own internal system. Although, as the company introduces new models, they are certified using the SAE standard. "When an all-new F-Series Super Duty is introduced, it also will use SAE J2807," said Ford to Autoblog in an emailed statement.

After Years Of Delays, Rear Visibility Requirements Move Closer To Reality

Fri, Jan 3 2014

Regulations that would require automakers to improve rear-view visibility on all new cars and light trucks are nearing completion after six years of delays. The U.S. Department of Transportation sent its proposed rear-visibility rules to the Obama administration for review on Christmas Day. The White House Office of Management and Budget now must finalize the regulations. The rule are intended to minimize the risk of pedestrian deaths from vehicles in reverse, a type of accident that disproportionately affects children. Already in 2014, two children have died from cars backing over them, driven in each case by the children's father. Specifics of the Transportation Department's proposal are not available during the review, but the rules are expected to compel automakers to install rear-view cameras as mandatory equipment on all new vehicles. That's what safety advocates have wanted all along. Thought they were pleased the proposed ruling had finally been issued, there was some worry Friday the final rules would omit the rear-view camera mandate. "We're encouraged, but we're also a little concerned about speculation the rear-view camera may not be in there," said Janette Fennell, the president and founder of Kids and Cars, a nonprofit organization dedicated to protecting children in and around vehicles. "I'm wondering where that might be coming from." On Thursday, The Automotive News had reported the possibility the new standards could offer an alternative to rear-view cameras, such as redesigned mirrors, that improved visibility. The Office of Management and Budget typically completes its reviews of new rules in 90 days, although that can be extended. OMB officials said Friday they do not comment on pending rules. The intent of the rules is to enhance rear visibility for drivers and prevent pedestrian deaths. Approximately 200 pedestrians are backed over in the United States each year, according to estimates from the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. Accidents Mostly Affect Children Roughly half the victims are children younger than age five. A government analysis concluded approximately half the victims -– 95 to 112 -– could be saved with new regulations. Yet the rules have arrived at a glacial pace. President George W. Bush signed legislation that had been passed with bipartisan Congressional support in 2008. But automakers have fought the idea of adding rear-view cameras, saying it is too expensive.