Find or Sell Used Cars, Trucks, and SUVs in USA

1931 Ford Model A 2 Door Sedan Project Car - Medal Body, No Engine, No Trans on 2040-cars

US $7,600.00
Year:1931 Mileage:0
Location:

Sun City, California, United States

Sun City, California, United States
Advertising:
Engine:-
Vehicle Title:Clear
Year: 1931
Make: Ford
Drive Type: -
Model: Model A
Mileage: 0
Trim: -
Condition: Used: A vehicle is considered used if it has been registered and issued a title. Used vehicles have had at least one previous owner. The condition of the exterior, interior and engine can vary depending on the vehicle's history. See the seller's listing for full details and description of any imperfections. ... 

 1931 Ford Model A

For sale 1931 Ford Model A 2 door sedan.  Metal body/good condition.  TCI Chasis.  8" rear end.  Set up for small block Chevy.  No engine, no trans.  It comes with everything you see in the photos (+ it has all brake lines, master cylinder and booster, break pedal, and 2 headlights that are not pictured). 20" rear wheels, 18" front wheels.  It HAD a motor in it (motor not included) and ran and was registered about a year or two ago.  It has the glass for all windows except the read side one.  It has the hood.  The 2 front fenders are steel.  The two wide back fenders are fiberglass.

If you have more questions please email Ernie @ gibsonjewel@aol.com 

Thanks for your interest.  Price $7,600.00

Auto Services in California

Xtreme Auto Sound ★★★★★

Automobile Parts & Supplies, Automobile Accessories, Automobile Radios & Stereo Systems
Address: 10080 Foothill Blvd, Lytle-Creek
Phone: (909) 481-9555

Woodard`s Automotive ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Parts & Supplies, Automobile Inspection Stations & Services
Address: 12831 Alcosta Blvd, San-Ramon
Phone: (925) 830-4701

Window Tinting A Plus ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Parts & Supplies, Window Tinting
Address: 3074 Broadway, Canyon
Phone: (510) 839-9871

Wickoff Racing ★★★★★

Automobile Parts & Supplies, Automobile Performance, Racing & Sports Car Equipment, Automobile Accessories
Address: 2352 E Orangethorpe Ave, Santa-Fe-Springs
Phone: (714) 526-6925

West Coast Auto Sales ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, New Car Dealers, Used Car Dealers
Address: 2165 Pine St, Weaverville
Phone: (530) 244-8088

Wescott`s Auto Wrecking & Truck Parts ★★★★★

Automobile Parts & Supplies, Used & Rebuilt Auto Parts, Junk Dealers
Address: 1569 Sebastopol Rd, San-Anselmo
Phone: (707) 542-0311

Auto blog

2018 Ford Expedition vs other big SUVs: How it compares on paper

Fri, Nov 10 2017

With our Alex Kierstein rightly impressed in his first-drive review of the new 2018 Ford Expedition, we decided to dig a little deeper into the numbers, and we came up with the spreadsheet below to highlight how the new 2018 Expedition compares on paper to its main full-size SUV competitors: the 2018 Chevy Tahoe and Suburban (and therefore the 2018 GMC Yukon), 2018 Toyota Sequoia and 2018 Nissan Armada. We also threw in the new, even bigger 2018 Chevrolet Traverse since, as you'll see, its massive dimensions should put it on the radar for anyone who needs loads of passenger and cargo space but doesn't care as much about towing. A few notes about the chart above. First, the 6.2-liter V8 that's included with the new-for-2018 Tahoe RST trim level is the standard engine on the GMC Yukon Denali. You can apply most of the Tahoe's numbers to the entire Yukon and Yukon XL lineup. Second, though we highlighted categories where the Traverse led, we also highlighted the runner-up full-size SUV, since this was ultimately about that segment. Traverse numbers are broadly applicable to the new Buick Enclave. Related Video: Chevrolet Ford GMC Nissan Toyota SUV Comparison consumer ford expedition gmc yukon chevy traverse toyota sequoia nissan armada chevrolet tahoe ford expedition max

Ford Q1 profits dragged down by warranty costs

Fri, 25 Apr 2014

General Motors isn't the only Detroit automaker posting falling profits in the first quarter. Ford just released its Q1 2014 financial data, and it reported a net income of $989 million, down $622 million from Q1 2013. The drop is partially blamed on higher warranty and recall expenses than the company had anticipated.
Financially, Ford suffered a rough quarter almost across the board. Its pre-tax profit of $1.4 billion was also down $765 million from a year ago. Things were even worse in the North American market where operating profit fell significantly to $1.5 billion, down from $2.392 billion in Q1 2013. However, its global revenue ticked up slightly to $35.9 billion, from $35.6 billion in this period in 2013.
Ford admitted that it spent about $900 million on expenses that it hadn't planned for during this quarter. According to Reuters, the company paid about $400 million in additional warranty and recall costs in North America. The automaker didn't explain why the costs were so much higher than expected. However, in the last three months, Ford has had several recalls, including on the 2001-2004 Escape for rust, Explorer for its steering, Edge for its fuel line and others.

Consumer Reports: Ford Fusion fun but flawed; Mitsubishi i-MiEV slow, chintzy [w/videos]

Wed, 23 Jan 2013

Waiting for a Ford compliment from Consumer Reports these days is like waiting for a low-cost new product from Apple. So we weren't really expecting a glowing review of the 2013 Ford Fusion when CR got its hands on the car. The institute's crew bought three different versions of the Fusion (Hybrid, 1.6-liter EcoBoost and a Titanium with the 2.0-liter EcoBoost) to put through its barrage of tests, and while we aren't too surprised by some of the findings, they're still interesting nonetheless.
CR praises the Fusion for its "eye-catching" design and says that the sportier Titanium trim level is the best-handling midsize sedan they've ever tested, but that's about where the good news ends for Ford. The Fusion Hybrid also posted the best-ever fuel economy CR has recorded in a midsize sedan, but the only problem is that their number was 39 miles per gallon combined - far less than Ford's 47 mpg rating for city, highway and combined. As expected, CR also dinged the Fusion for its MyFord Touch, but some of the other gripes about the car include a cramped cabin and poor fit and finish.
Other Ford products tested this time around include the Focus Electric and C-Max Hybrid. Like the Fusion, CR's observed fuel economy of 37 mpg for the C-Max fell well short of Ford's advertised 47-mpg rating, and both cars were criticized for the use of MyFord Touch. CR notes that the Focus Electric's interior is also cramped, with the battery pack taking up a lot of cargo space.