Find or Sell Used Cars, Trucks, and SUVs in USA

1930 Ford Model A Deluxe Coupe on 2040-cars

US $18,500.00
Year:1930 Mileage:21000
Location:

Summerfield, Florida, United States

Summerfield, Florida, United States
Advertising:

1930 Ford Model A, Deluxe Coupe.  Older restoration to original standards.  One owner for past 17 years.  Great driver. 

ColorsChickle drab and copra drab with black fenders; pin stripe and wheels are straw

Features6 volt system with alternator; Halogen headlights; Engine has 1500 miles since rebuild; Engine plumbed to receive oil immediately upon starting; New rear brakes, drums and lining; Front brakes are very good; New radiator; Motor meter; Trailer hitch, small (40”x48”) trailer painted to match car; Wind wings, etched; Tan trunk.

AwardsAACA – Senior; VMCCA – Golden Award of Excellence

$18,500

Call Buddy Pearce – (352) 307-8521 -- CALL BUDDY IF YOU ARE INTERESTED IN BUYING THIS PIECE OF AMERICAN HISTORY.

Auto Services in Florida

Zephyrhills Auto Repair ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service
Address: 39242 South Ave, Kathleen
Phone: (813) 780-7181

Yimmy`s Body Shop & Auto Repair ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Body Repairing & Painting
Address: 3070A Michigan Ave, Celebration
Phone: (407) 932-4551

WRD Auto Tints ★★★★★

Used Car Dealers, Window Tinting, Car Wash
Address: 1200 South Dixie Highway, North-Miami-Beach
Phone: (305) 970-2357

Wray`s Auto Service Inc ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Parts & Supplies, Brake Repair
Address: 5550 Wray Way, Trinity
Phone: (727) 937-2902

Wheaton`s Service Center ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Towing, Tire Dealers
Address: 101500 Overseas Hwy, Ocean-Reef
Phone: (305) 451-3500

Waltronics Auto Care ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service
Address: 1080 E Carroll St, Davenport
Phone: (407) 931-2518

Auto blog

Ford starting up 2.0L EcoBoost engine production in Ohio

Fri, 22 Feb 2013

Joe Hinrichs, Ford's President of The Americas (pictured above), announced today that in late 2014, the automaker will be building the 2.0-liter EcoBoost four-cylinder at its Cleveland Engine Plant, a move requiring a $200-million investment and the hiring of 450 new employees. European-built Ford products will continue to source this engine from the Valencia, Spain plant where all of these EcoBoost four-cylinder engines are currently built, and the new Cleveland engines will be used for all North American-made models.
Ford is planning to build its popular EcoBoost engines regionally to maximize production capacity and meet customer demand. Last year, Ford sold 334,364 vehicles with EcoBoost engines in the US alone, and that number is expected to swell to more than 500,000 by the end of this year, with global sales expected to total 1.6 million. By 2015, Ford says that 95 percent of its nameplates will offer an EcoBoost engine.
One such vehicle that could be adding an EcoBoost engine, according to Automotive News, is none other than the 2015 Ford Mustang. The report says that Ford could use either the 2.0-liter EcoBoost or an upcoming 2.3-liter EcoBoost in the sixth-generation pony car.

BMW, Hyundai score big in JD Power's first Tech Experience Index

Mon, Oct 10 2016

While automakers are quick to brag about winning a JD Power Initial Quality Study award, the reality, as we've pointed out before, is that these ratings are somewhat misleading, since IQS doesn't necessarily distinguish genuine quality issues. JD Power's new Tech Experience Index aims to solve that problem. The new metric takes the same 90-day approach as IQS but focuses exclusively on technology – collision protection, comfort and convenience, driving assistance, entertainment and connectivity, navigation, and smartphone mirroring. It splits the industry up into just seven segments, based loosely on size, which is why the Chevrolet Camaro is in the same division (mid-size) as Kia Sorento and the Mercedes-Benz GLE-Class is in the same segment as the Hyundai Genesis (mid-size premium). It makes for some screwy bedfellows, to be sure. Still, splitting tech experience away from initial quality should allow customers to make more informed and intelligent decisions when buying new vehicles. In the inaugural study, respondents listed BMW and Hyundai as the big winners, with two segment awards – the 2 Series for small premium and the 4 Series for compact premium, and the Genesis for mid-size premium and Tucson for small segment. The Chevrolet Camaro (midsize), Kia Forte (compact), and Nissan Maxima (large) scored individual wins. Ford also had a surprising hit with the Lincoln MKC, which ranked third in the compact premium segment behind the 4 Series and Lexus IS. This is a coup for the Blue Oval, whose woeful MyFord Touch systems made the brand a victim of the IQS' flaws in the early 2010s. But Ford and other automakers might not want to celebrate just yet. According to JD Power, there's still a lot of room for improvement – navigation systems were the lowest-rated piece of tech in the study. Instead, customers repeatedly saluted collision-avoidance and safety systems, giving the category the best marks of the study and listing blind-spot monitoring and backup cameras as two must-have features – 96 percent of respondents said they wanted those two systems in their next vehicle. But this isn't really a surprise. Implementation of safety systems from brand to brand is similar, and they don't require any input from users, unlike navigation and infotainment systems which are frustratingly deep.

EPA says fuel economy test for hybrids is accurate

Mon, 26 Aug 2013


The EPA says it stands behind its fuel economy test for hybrid vehicles following controversy about the testing process after Ford C-Max Hybrid customers and automotive journalists alike struggled to achieve 47 miles per gallon, the advertised mpg number, Automotive News reports. Ford responded to the issue almost two weeks ago by claiming that a 1970s-era EPA general label rule was responsible for the inaccurate mileage numbers, rerating the C-Max Hybrid's mpg numbers and offering customers rebates. Ford later said it didn't overstate the C-Max Hybrid's fuel economy and that it was surprised by the low numbers.
Ford technically didn't do anything wrong because it was following the general label rule, but agency regulator Christopher Grundler says the automaker was exploiting a loophole when it came up with the hybrid C-Max numbers, and that the testing process remains accurate. The general label rule allows vehicles that use the same engine and transmission and are in the same weight class to share fuel economy numbers, but it doesn't take into account other factors such as aerodynamic efficiency, which affects hybrids more drastically than non-hybrid vehicles. Ford originally used the Fusion Hybrid economy figures for the C-Max Hybrid and claimed the engineers didn't realize that its aerodynamic efficiency would affect fuel economy as much as it did.