1963 Ford Falcon Futura Coupe Automatic 6 Cylinder No Reserve on 2040-cars
Orange, California, United States
Body Type:Coupe
Vehicle Title:Clear
Engine:3.3L V6
Fuel Type:Gasoline
For Sale By:Private Seller
Used
Year: 1963
Number of Cylinders: 6
Make: Ford
Model: Falcon
Trim: Futura
Options: Leather Seats
Drive Type: RWD
Mileage: 96,100
Exterior Color: Silver
Warranty: Vehicle does NOT have an existing warranty
Interior Color: Red
Ford Falcon for Sale
1964 ford falcon sprint convertible(US $27,000.00)
1963 ford falcon futura convertible 93,000 miles automatic 170 6 cyllinder
1965 ford falcon base 2.8l(US $6,000.00)
65 ford falcon futura - 2 door(US $5,500.00)
1964 ford falcon sprint convertible v-8 auto(US $21,999.00)
1962 ford falcon, 170 cubic inch inline 6cyl. 3 speed on the tree, all original.
Auto Services in California
Zenith Wire Wheel Co ★★★★★
Yucca Auto Body ★★★★★
World Famous 4x4 ★★★★★
Woody`s & Auto Body ★★★★★
Williams Auto Care Center ★★★★★
Wheels N Motion ★★★★★
Auto blog
2015 Ford Mustang EcoBoost flogged and analyzed by Ignition
Mon, 13 Oct 2014Aside from the way it looks and perhaps its independent rear suspension, the biggest bit of news on the 2015 Mustang may be the inclusion of its 2.3-liter, turbocharged four-cylinder engine. That blown mill marks the first time since the Mustang SVO of the '80s that a turbo has been fitted under the engine of Ford's pony car.
The Mustang EcoBoost is the subject of the latest episode of Ignition from Motor Trend, giving us a great look at the technical, nitty-gritty side of the turbocharged coupe. Covering it from bow to stern, host Carlos Lago walks us through the boosted Ford before taking to the track for some driving impressions, with particular praise given to the low-end grunt of the 2.3-liter mill.
Check out the full video and then let us know which 2015 Mustang has your interest piqued the most - the EcoBoost four, the 5.0L V8 or the entry-level V6.
CES 2018 brings a buffet of automotive tech — here's a taste
Mon, Jan 8 2018Green CES Ford GM Honda Kia Lexus Nissan Tesla Toyota Technology Emerging Technologies Gadgets Autonomous Vehicles Uber las vegas rinspeed Samsung nvidia intel harman Nio baidu
EPA says fuel economy test for hybrids is accurate
Mon, 26 Aug 2013
The EPA says it stands behind its fuel economy test for hybrid vehicles following controversy about the testing process after Ford C-Max Hybrid customers and automotive journalists alike struggled to achieve 47 miles per gallon, the advertised mpg number, Automotive News reports. Ford responded to the issue almost two weeks ago by claiming that a 1970s-era EPA general label rule was responsible for the inaccurate mileage numbers, rerating the C-Max Hybrid's mpg numbers and offering customers rebates. Ford later said it didn't overstate the C-Max Hybrid's fuel economy and that it was surprised by the low numbers.
Ford technically didn't do anything wrong because it was following the general label rule, but agency regulator Christopher Grundler says the automaker was exploiting a loophole when it came up with the hybrid C-Max numbers, and that the testing process remains accurate. The general label rule allows vehicles that use the same engine and transmission and are in the same weight class to share fuel economy numbers, but it doesn't take into account other factors such as aerodynamic efficiency, which affects hybrids more drastically than non-hybrid vehicles. Ford originally used the Fusion Hybrid economy figures for the C-Max Hybrid and claimed the engineers didn't realize that its aerodynamic efficiency would affect fuel economy as much as it did.
2040Cars.com © 2012-2025. All Rights Reserved.
Designated trademarks and brands are the property of their respective owners.
Use of this Web site constitutes acceptance of the 2040Cars User Agreement and Privacy Policy.
0.046 s, 7929 u
