Find or Sell Used Cars, Trucks, and SUVs in USA

One 1 Owner Low Miles 6.7l Powerstroke Diesel Crew Cab Leather Nav Heated Seats on 2040-cars

Year:2014 Mileage:6078 Color: Burgundy
Location:

Puyallup, Washington, United States

Puyallup, Washington, United States
Advertising:

Auto Services in Washington

Wrench-N-Time Quality Auto ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Electric Service
Address: 800 Grand Blvd, Vancouver
Phone: (360) 695-6526

Wesco Autobody Supply Inc ★★★★★

Automobile Body Repairing & Painting, Automobile Parts & Supplies, Automobile Body Shop Equipment & Supply-Wholesale & Manufacturers
Address: 13900 NE 20th St, Preston
Phone: (425) 746-9970

Tiny`s Tire Factory ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Tire Dealers, Brake Repair
Address: 10805 Pacific Ave S, University-Place
Phone: (253) 531-4535

Taylors Mobile RV & Auto Service ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Trailers-Repair & Service, Recreational Vehicles & Campers-Repair & Service
Address: South-Prairie
Phone: (253) 306-6493

Tayag`s Auto Repair ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service
Address: 6185 4th Ave S, Southworth
Phone: (206) 767-7008

Specialty Motors ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Brake Repair
Address: 12517 15th Ave NE, Kingston
Phone: (206) 367-4403

Auto blog

Ford recalling nearly 5,700 2014 F-150s for power steering issue

Wed, 25 Jun 2014

Ford is recalling 5,675 of its 2014 F-150 pickups over an issue with the electric power steering system. There haven't been any injuries or accidents due to the issue.
Ford spokesman Mike Levine told Autoblog that the "electric power-assisted steering and motor position sensor gear were incorrectly installed by a supplier," leading to the recall.
While the recall is larger on the surface, it's important to note that only 260 trucks have been delivered to customers. The remaining pickups are currently en route to dealers. The affected vehicles were manufactured between May 26 and June 19.

Ford made three big mistakes in calculating MPG for 2013 C-Max Hybrid

Tue, Jun 17 2014

It's been a rough time for the official fuel economy figures for the Ford C-Max Hybrid. When the car was released in 2012, Ford made a huge deal about how it would beat the Toyota Prius V, which was rated at 42 combined miles per gallon, 44 city and 40 highway. The Ford? 47 mpg across the board. How did Ford come to this place, where its Prius-beater turned into an also-ran? Well, after hearing customer complaints and issuing a software update in mid-2013, then discovering a real problem with the numbers last fall and then making a big announcement last week that the fuel economy ratings of six different 2013 and 2014 model year vehicles would need to be lowered, the C-Max Hybrid has ended up at 40 combined, 42 city and 37 highway. In other words, the Prius trumps it, as daily drivers of those two vehicles have known for a long time. The changes will not only affect the window sticker, but also the effect that the C-Max Hybrid (and the five other Ford vehicles that had their fuel economy figures lowered last week) have on Ford's compliance with greenhouse gas and CAFE rules for model year 2013 and 2014. How did Ford come to this place, where its Prius-beater turned into an also-ran? There are two technical answers to that question, which we've got below, as well as some context for how Ford's mistakes will play out in the bigger world of green vehicles. Let's start with Ford's second error, which is easy to do since we documented it in detail last year (the first, needing to do a software update, was also covered). The basic gist is that Ford used the general label rule (completely legally) to test the Fusion Hybrid and use those numbers to figure out how efficient the C-Max Hybrid is. That turned out to be a mistake, since the two vehicles are different enough that their numbers were not comparable, despite having the same engine, transmission and test weight, as the rules require. You can read more details here. Ford's Said Deep admitted that the TRLHP issue is completely separate from the general label error from last year. Now let's move on to last week's announcement. What's interesting is that the new recalculation of the MPG numbers – downward, of course – was caused by a completely separate issue, something called the Total Road Load Horsepower (TRLHP). Ford's Said Deep admitted to AutoblogGreen that the TRLHP issue had nothing to do with the general label error from last year.

Ford partnering with MIT, Stanford on autonomous vehicle research

Fri, 24 Jan 2014

Ask any car engineer what's the biggest variable in achieving fuel economy targets, and he'll tell you "the driver." If one human can't understand human driving behavior enough to be certain about an innocuous number like miles per gallon, how is an autonomous car supposed to figure out what hundreds of other drivers are going to do in the course of a day? Ford has enlisted the help of Stanford and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology to find out.
Starting with the automated Fusion Hybrid introduced in December, MIT will be developing algorithms that driverless cars can use to "predict actions of other vehicles and pedestrians" and objects within the three-dimensional map provided by its four LIDAR sensors.
The Stanford team will research how to extend the 'vision' of that LIDAR array beyond obstructions while driving, analogous to the way a driver uses the entire width of a lane to see what's ahead of a larger vehicle in front. Ford says it wants to "provide the vehicle with common sense" as part of its Blueprint for Mobility, preparing for an autonomous world from 2025 and beyond.