Ford F-350 Xlt Crew Cab Pickup 4-door on 2040-cars
Happy Valley, Oregon, United States
This is a very nice truck with pretty well every factory option you could get in 1996 and truck has always been stored under cover. Has new exhaust with exhaust brake and Edge four stage tuner. This truck is outfitted with the Roll Along Package that includes lit grab handles on the side of the cab, overhead cab lights, lit running boards, custom rear bumper, custom pin striping, custom driving lights in the grill just to name a few items. Has Kelderman air ride conversion system and B&W trailer goose neck hitch. The inside of the bed has no dents and preserved with a spray in bed liner. Comes with transfer tank in bed and combined fuel capacity is over 80 gallons. Tailgate and bed rails are caped in diamond plate. New Bushwacker flares painted to match. Has AC, Power steering, Power brakes, Cruise, tilt, AM/FM Tape deck, Power windows, door locks, Power seats, Tow package. Recent work done includes, New starter, cam sensor, fuel filter canister and regulator, Mass air, New fuel pump, New oversized injectors.
Ford F-350 for Sale
Jhkjhkjhk(US $3,500.00)
Ford f-350 ranger xlt(US $2,000.00)
1960 f350 classic dump truck, straight body, mechanically sound, runs excellent, clean title(US $3,000.00)
Ford f-350 xlt heavy duty(US $2,000.00)
Ford f-350 xlt(US $2,000.00)
Ford f-350 lariat(US $22,000.00)
Auto Services in Oregon
Uncle Al`s Automotive Service ★★★★★
Toyota of Gladstone ★★★★★
Tommy`s Window Tinting ★★★★★
Three Sisters Automotive ★★★★★
Peoria Electric ★★★★★
Oak Valley Honda ★★★★★
Auto blog
2014 Ford F-150 gets CNG option
Wed, 31 Jul 2013Ford is toiling away, installing heavy-duty engine components into select 3.7-liter V6s to allow them to run on compressed natural gas (CNG) and liquid petroleum gas (LPG) in addition to gasoline. That's nothing new, but now, Ford has announced that it will offer the 2014 F-150 with this engine configuration, bringing the Blue Oval's total number of CNG/LPG-friendly vehicles up to eight. The F-150 will be the only half-ton pickup on the market that can run on these gases.
Ford will charge $315 per vehicle to equip the optional engine, but the trucks won't be ready to run on the alternative fuels straight from the factory and must be upfitted with additional equipment. A Ford Qualified Vehicle Modifier will install a separate fuel system for the compressed gases at a cost of $7,500 to $9,500, depending on fuel tank size. With the right-size tank, the F-150 equipped with the CNG/LPG-prepped engine can go 750 miles on one tank of gas, according to Ford, averaging 23 miles per gallon.
The practice of offering flex-fuel vehicles is gaining momentum as businesses take advantage of cheap gas. CNG can be bought for $2.11/gallon on average (per gasoline equivalent), and sometimes for as little as $1.00 in some parts of the US, Ford states. "With the money saved using CNG, customers could start to see payback on their investment in as little as 24 to 36 months," says Jon Coleman, Ford's fleet sustainability and technology manager. The automaker expects to sell a total of 15,000 CNG/LPG-prepped vehicles in the 2014 model year.
Ford Everest Concept shows China also has an affinity for big trucks
Mon, 21 Apr 2014The Ford Everest Concept SUV at the 2014 Beijing Motor Show shows the future of the Blue Oval's truck line in China. While a concept for now, we're told that JMC, Ford's Chinese joint-venture partner, will build a production version sometime in the near future.
With design from Ford's Asia Pacific design team, the handsome seven-passenger SUV shows off some very muscular styling with wraparound headlights that hook into the contours of the angular trapezoidal grille. The beltline rises up the body in the rear and makes the back appear higher than the front. The rear is made from hard, chiseled contours that give the truck a very tough look. The Everest looks ready for some rough roads.
Ford is keeping the interior and mechanical details about the Everest a secret for now, but the SUV is rumored to share some components with the overseas Ranger pickup. The company has no plans to sell the truck in North America. Scroll down to read the official announcement, including the few details on its production.
Poor headlights cause 40 cars to miss IIHS Top Safety Pick rating
Mon, Aug 6 2018Over the past few months, we've noticed a number of cars and SUVs that have come incredibly close to earning one of the IIHS's highest accolades, the Top Safety Pick rating. They have great crash test scores and solid automatic emergency braking and forward collision warning systems. What trips them up is headlights. That got us wondering, how many vehicles are there that are coming up short because they don't have headlights that meet the organization's criteria for an "Acceptable" or "Good" rating. This is a revision made after 2017, a year in which headlights weren't factored in for this specific award. This is also why why some vehicles, such as the Ford F-150, might have had the award last year, but have lost it for this year. We reached out to someone at IIHS to find out. He responded with the following car models. Depending on how you count, a whopping 40 models crash well enough to receive the rating, but don't get it because their headlights are either "Poor" or "Marginal." We say depending on how you count because the IIHS actual counts truck body styles differently, and the Infiniti Q70 is a special case. Apparently the version of the Q70 that has good headlights doesn't have adequate forward collision prevention technology. And the one that has good forward collision tech doesn't have good enough headlights. We've provided the entire list of vehicles below in alphabetical order. Interestingly, it seems the Volkswagen Group is having the most difficulty providing good headlights with its otherwise safe cars. It had the most models on the list at 9 split between Audi and Volkswagen. GM is next in line with 7 models. It is worth noting again that though these vehicles have subpar headlights and don't quite earn Top Safety Pick awards, that doesn't mean they're unsafe. They all score well enough in crash testing and forward collision prevention that they would get the coveted award if the lights were better.