2008 Ford F-150 Xlt Crew Cab Pickup 4-door 5.4l on 2040-cars
Bay City, Michigan, United States
Body Type:Crew Cab Pickup
Vehicle Title:Clear
Engine:5.4L 330Cu. In. V8 GAS SOHC Naturally Aspirated
Fuel Type:GAS
For Sale By:Private Seller
Number of Cylinders: 8
Make: Ford
Model: F-150
Trim: XLT Crew Cab Pickup 4-Door
Options: 4-Wheel Drive, CD Player
Drive Type: 4WD
Safety Features: Anti-Lock Brakes, Driver Airbag, Passenger Airbag
Mileage: 116,500
Power Options: Air Conditioning, Cruise Control, Power Locks, Power Windows
Sub Model: XLT
Exterior Color: Red
Interior Color: Black/Grey
I am the original owner of this truck. I bought it from dealer and it had approximately 6,000 miles on the odometer when I drove it off the lot. The local dealer got it from a dealer in NY that apparently used the truck at their dealership. The miles on the truck are mostly highway miles driven for work with just myself in the truck. Interior is in excellent condition. The exterior of the truck in in very good condition. No rust! There are two small dents on the passanger side, one from a baseball and one from a car wash wand that hit the fender. The truck get about 16 mpg on average. The transmission was replaced at the dealership due to a bearing worn out in the middle of the trans, when the truch had approximately 82,000 miles on it. Cap and bed mat included. Cap is approx 17 months old. NADA is $21,775.00. The reserve is set considerably lower! Message me with any questions or to make offer. Note there is an accident that shows up on the history report, my wife was driving the truck and backed out of a driveway and a small station wagon across the street was also backing out and hit my truck in the rear left tire. The other car broke his tail light and the police were called out for the accident. There was no damage to the truck or tire!
Ford F-150 for Sale
2011 ford f-150 superwcrew xlt texas edition 2wd pick up truck 6cd one owner!(US $26,988.00)
2000 ford f-150 base standard cab pickup 2-door 4.6l
2009 ford f-150 xl extended cab pickup 4-door 4.6l 3-valve(US $15,900.00)
2009 ford f-150 supercrew crew cab one owner serviced 22" wheels low reserve no(US $13,900.00)
1976 ford f150 ranger highboy xlt 4x4 longbed 1975 1974 1973 1977 1978 f250
2012 ford f150 harley-davidson crew 6.2 sunroof nav 14k texas direct auto(US $44,980.00)
Auto Services in Michigan
Wohlford`s Brake Stop ★★★★★
Wilder Auto Service ★★★★★
Valvoline Instant Oil Change ★★★★★
Trend Auto Sales ★★★★★
Transmission Authority ★★★★★
The Collision Shop ★★★★★
Auto blog
Bill Ford op-ed argues we can't just build and sell more of the same cars
Thu, 10 Jul 2014It's hardly a secret that the auto industry is undergoing an enormous, tectonic shift in the way it thinks, builds cars and does business. Between alternative forms of energy, a renewed focus on low curb weights and aerodynamic bodies, the advent of driverless and autonomous cars and the need to reduce the our impact on the environment, it's very likely that the car that's built 10 years down the line will be scarcely recognizable when parked next to the car from 10 years ago.
Few people are as able to explain the industry's many upcoming changes and challenges as clearly as William Clay Ford, Jr., better known as Bill Ford. The 57-year-old currently sits as the executive chairman of the company his great-grandfather, Henry Ford, founded over 110 years ago.
In an op-ed piece in The Wall Street Journal (subscription required), Ford explains that the role of automakers is, necessarily, going to change to suit the needs of the future world. That means changing the view of not just the automobile, but the automaker. As Ford explains it, automakers will "move from being just car and truck manufacturers to become personal-mobility companies."
Poor headlights cause 40 cars to miss IIHS Top Safety Pick rating
Mon, Aug 6 2018Over the past few months, we've noticed a number of cars and SUVs that have come incredibly close to earning one of the IIHS's highest accolades, the Top Safety Pick rating. They have great crash test scores and solid automatic emergency braking and forward collision warning systems. What trips them up is headlights. That got us wondering, how many vehicles are there that are coming up short because they don't have headlights that meet the organization's criteria for an "Acceptable" or "Good" rating. This is a revision made after 2017, a year in which headlights weren't factored in for this specific award. This is also why why some vehicles, such as the Ford F-150, might have had the award last year, but have lost it for this year. We reached out to someone at IIHS to find out. He responded with the following car models. Depending on how you count, a whopping 40 models crash well enough to receive the rating, but don't get it because their headlights are either "Poor" or "Marginal." We say depending on how you count because the IIHS actual counts truck body styles differently, and the Infiniti Q70 is a special case. Apparently the version of the Q70 that has good headlights doesn't have adequate forward collision prevention technology. And the one that has good forward collision tech doesn't have good enough headlights. We've provided the entire list of vehicles below in alphabetical order. Interestingly, it seems the Volkswagen Group is having the most difficulty providing good headlights with its otherwise safe cars. It had the most models on the list at 9 split between Audi and Volkswagen. GM is next in line with 7 models. It is worth noting again that though these vehicles have subpar headlights and don't quite earn Top Safety Pick awards, that doesn't mean they're unsafe. They all score well enough in crash testing and forward collision prevention that they would get the coveted award if the lights were better.
IIHS updates overlap test: 2 SUVs get good marks, 9 fare poorly
Tue, Dec 13 2022Vehicles in crashes keep occupants safe by deforming around the cabin in a way that maintains cabin integrity. The Insurance Institute for Highway Safety's moderate overlap test, introduced in 1995, has been a huge contributor to improved safety for front-row passengers in a crash. IIHS President David Harkey said, "Thanks to automakers’ improvements, drivers in most vehicles are nearly 50% less likely to be killed in a frontal crash today than they were 25 years ago." In the 'unintentional side effects' column, crash safety has gotten worse for passengers in the back seats. When carmakers reengineered the front crash structure to protect the driver, more crash forces got distributed throughout the rear. IIHS research claims rear passengers have a 46% greater risk of fatal injury than front-row passengers, but back-seaters haven't benefited from the same upgrades in safety as the front row. The IIHS updated its moderate overlap test to address the issue, putting 15 vehicles through the new regime. Two earned good ratings — the 2023 Ford Escape and the 2021-2023 Volvo XC40 — one was acceptable, three were marginal and nine were rated poor. Every one of the crossovers sampled got good marks for all passengers in the original test. That test sees 40% of vehicle's width on the driver's side impacting an aluminum honeycomb barrier at 40 miles per hour. The updated test puts a crash dummy representing small woman or 12-year-old child in the seat behind the driver, the dummy's sensors and grease paint measuring the effectiveness of the restraints and the forces a human body would need to endure. To achieve a good rating, the "measurements must not exceed limits indicating excessive risk of injury to the head, neck, chest, abdomen or thigh." An institute engineer said, "In real-world crashes, chest injuries are the most common serious rear-seat injuries for adults." The sensors and video evidence showed back seat dummies in the Escape and XC40 endured minimal risk of injuries from excessive crash forces, from submarining under the seat belt, or from unwanted interaction with the side curtain airbag.  The Toyota RAV4 scored acceptable. The second-row dummy also endured minimal risk of injury to the chest and lower extremities. However, the lap belt slipped upward in a way that could increase abdominal injuries, and after the dummy's head dipped during crash impact, the head came back up between the rear curtain airbag and rear window.
















