2004 Ford F150 Xl Super Cab V8 4x2 on 2040-cars
Shawnee, Kansas, United States
Engine:4.6L 281Cu. In. V8 GAS SOHC Naturally Aspirated
Vehicle Title:Clear
Exterior Color: White
Make: Ford
Interior Color: Tan
Model: F-150
Number of Cylinders: 8
Trim: XL Extended Cab Pickup 4-Door
Warranty: Unspecified
Drive Type: RWD
Mileage: 150,475
This 2004 Ford F150 XL is in good condition. It has been inspected and fully serviced. It has a clear title and runs great. Would make a great work truck.
Ford F-150 for Sale
2009 ford f-150 xl extended cab pickup 4-door 5.4l(US $9,500.00)
2000 ford f-150 lightning standard cab pickup 2-door 5.4l(US $13,500.00)
2006 ford f-150 king ranch crew cab pickup 4-door 5.4l
2004 ford f150 f-150 dedicated cng natural gas ngv pickup truck 7700 series
2012 ford f-150 xl standard cab pickup 2-door 3.7l
10 crew cab king ranch truck leather low miles
Auto Services in Kansas
Ussery Auto Body Repair Inc ★★★★★
Schoonover`s Auto Repair ★★★★★
Raytown Skelly Service ★★★★★
Pdi Clear Bra ★★★★★
Mike`s Car Care Center ★★★★★
Midwest Tinting ★★★★★
Auto blog
Nuclear-powered concept cars from the Atomic Age
Thu, 17 Jul 2014In the 1950s and early 60s, the dawn of nuclear power was supposed to lead to a limitless consumer culture, a world of flying cars and autonomous kitchens all powered by clean energy. In Europe, it offered the then-limping continent a cheap, inexhaustible supply of power after years of rationing and infrastructure damage brought on by two World Wars.
The development of nuclear-powered submarines and ships during the 1940s and 50s led car designers to begin conceptualizing atomic vehicles. Fueled by a consistent reaction, these cars would theoretically produce no harmful byproducts and rarely need to refuel. Combining these vehicles with the new interstate system presented amazing potential for American mobility.
But the fantasy soon faded. There were just too many problems with the realities of nuclear power. For starters, the powerplant would be too small to attain a reaction unless the car contained weapons-grade atomic materials. Doing so would mean every fender-bender could result in a minor nuclear holocaust. Additionally, many of the designers assumed a lightweight shielding material or even forcefields would eventually be invented (they still haven't) to protect passengers from harmful radiation. Analyses of the atomic car concept at the time determined that a 50-ton lead barrier would be necessary to prevent exposure.
Focus ST Tuner, Traffic Deaths, Audi EV SUV | Autoblog Mintue
Sat, Aug 22 2015Autoblog senior editor Greg Migliore gives the highlights from the week in automotive news.
Why the Detroit Three should merge their engine operations
Tue, Dec 22 2015GM and FCA should consider a smaller merger that could still save them billions of dollars, and maybe lure Ford into the deal. Fiat-Chrysler CEO Sergio Marchionne would love to see his company merge with General Motors. But GM's board of directors essentially told him to go pound sand. So now what? The boardroom battle started when Mr. Marchionne published a study called Confessions of a Capital Junkie. In it, Sergio detailed the amount of capital the auto industry wastes every year with duplicate investments. And he documented how other industries provide superior returns. He's right, of course. Other industries earn much better returns on their invested capital. And there's a danger that one day the investors will turn their backs on the auto industry and look to other business sectors where they can make more money. But even with powerful arguments Marchionne couldn't convince GM to take over FCA. And while that fight may now be over, GM and FCA should consider a smaller merger that could still save them billions of dollars, and maybe lure Ford into the deal. No doubt this suggestion will send purists into convulsions, but so be it. The Detroit Three should seriously consider merging their powertrain operations, even though that's a sacrilege in an industry that still considers the engine the "heart" of the car. These automakers have built up considerable brand equity in some of their engines. But the vast majority of American car buyers could not tell you what kind of engine they have under the hood. More importantly, most car buyers really don't care what kind of engine or transmission they have as long as it's reliable, durable, and efficient. Combining that production would give the Detroit Three the kind of scale that no one else could match. There are exceptions, of course. Hardcore enthusiasts care deeply about the powertrains in their cars. So do most diesel, plug-in, and hybrid owners. But all of them account for maybe 15 percent of the car-buying public. So that means about 85 percent of car buyers don't care where their engine and transmission came from, just as they don't know or care who supplied the steel, who made the headlamps, or who delivered the seats on a just-in-time basis. It's immaterial to them. And that presents the automakers with an opportunity to achieve a staggering level of manufacturing scale. In the NAFTA market alone, GM, Ford, and FCA will build nearly nine million engines and nine million transmissions this year.



