Find or Sell Used Cars, Trucks, and SUVs in USA

2010 Ford Transit Connect Xl Mini Cargo Van 4-door 2.0l on 2040-cars

US $14,900.00
Year:2010 Mileage:54418 Color: White /
 Gray
Location:

Norfolk, Virginia, United States

Norfolk, Virginia, United States
Advertising:
Transmission:Automatic
Engine:2.0L 121Cu. In. l4 GAS DOHC Naturally Aspirated
Vehicle Title:Clear
Body Type:Mini Cargo Van
Fuel Type:GAS
For Sale By:Dealer
VIN: nm0ls7an8at010136 Year: 2010
Sub Model: XL
Make: Ford
Exterior Color: White
Model: Transit Connect
Interior Color: Gray
Trim: XL Mini Cargo Van 4-Door
Warranty: Vehicle has an existing warranty
Drive Type: FWD
Number of Cylinders: 4
Safety Features: Driver Airbag, Passenger Airbag
Power Options: Air Conditioning
Disability Equipped: No
Mileage: 54,418
Condition: Used: A vehicle is considered used if it has been registered and issued a title. Used vehicles have had at least one previous owner. The condition of the exterior, interior and engine can vary depending on the vehicle's history. See the seller's listing for full details and description of any imperfections. ... 

WE ARE OFFERING A 2010 FORD TRANSIT CONNECT WITH 54,000 MILES. THIS IS A DEALER TRADE WITH A  EXELLENT SERVICE HISTORY. THE ENGINE RUNS SMOOTH WITH NO LEAKS AND THE TRANSMISSION SHIFTS PERFECT WITH NO HESITATIONS. OPTIONS ON THIS TRANSIT INCLUDE : 2.0 4 CYL ENGINE, AUTOMATIC TRANSMISSION, POWER STEERING, CLOTH SEATS , DUAL AIRBAGS, MANUAL WINDOWS, DUAL SLIDING REAR DOORS,AM/FM STEREO, ICE COLD AIR CONDITIONING, TINTED GLASS, ABS BRAKES AND REAR BARN DOORS.WE ARE A VIRGINIA DEALER #4137, SERVING OUR AREA SINCE 1996. ALL RETAIL SALES ARE SUBJECT TO A $250.00 PROCESSING FEE TO COVER TEMP. TAGS AND TITLE TRANSFER. THIS FORD IS STILL COVERED UNDER THE 5 YEAR/100,000 MILE POWERTRAIN WARRANTY. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE CALL 1800 569 7278 OR 757 461 7552. THANKS FOR LOOKING AND GOOD LUCK WITH YOUR SEARCH!

Auto Services in Virginia

Xtensive Body & Paint ★★★★★

Automobile Body Repairing & Painting
Address: 10707 Stoner Dr, Corbin
Phone: (540) 710-9684

Tread Quarters Discount Tire ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Tire Dealers
Address: 1401 Airline Blvd, Portsmouth
Phone: (757) 393-6000

Taylor`s Automotive ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service
Address: 201 Beech Dr, Grafton
Phone: (757) 240-5996

Sterling Transmission ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Clutches, Transmissions-Other
Address: 45759-A Elmwood Ct, Herndon
Phone: (571) 748-6340

Staples Automotive ★★★★★

Automobile Parts & Supplies, Automobile Parts, Supplies & Accessories-Wholesale & Manufacturers, Automobile Accessories
Address: 1907 Boulevard, Carson
Phone: (804) 526-2936

Stanton`s Towing ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Truck Wrecking, Towing
Address: 1377B Anderson Hwy, Powhatan
Phone: (804) 658-6088

Auto blog

Ford Mustang Mach-E fails Sweden's moose test

Wed, Sep 29 2021

The infamous moose test has claimed another casualty. This time it's the Ford Mustang Mach-E AWD Long Range, which was tested in an electric four-way alongside the Tesla Model Y, Hyundai Ioniq 5 and Skoda Enyaq iV (an electric utility vehicle closely related to the Volkswagen ID.4 that is sold in the United States). According to the Swedish testers at Teknikens Varld, Ford's electric car not only failed to hit the speed necessary for a passing grade, it didn't perform well at slower speeds, either. To pass the outlet's moose test, a car has to complete a rapid left-right-straight S-shaped pattern marked by cones at a speed of at least 72 km/h (44.7 miles per hour). The test is designed to mimic the type of avoidance maneuver a driver would have to take in order to avoid hitting something that wandered into the road, which in Sweden may be a moose but could just as easily be a deer or some other member of the animal kingdom elsewhere in the world, or possibly a child or car backing into the motorway. Not only is the maneuver very aggressive, it's also performed with weights belted into each seat and more weight added to the cargo area to hit the vehicle's maximum allowable carrying capacity. The Mustang Mach-E only managed to complete the moose test at 68 km/h (42.3 mph), well below the passing-grade threshold. Even at much lower speeds, Teknikens Varld says the Mach-E (which boasts the highest carrying capacity and was therefore loaded with more weight than the rest of the vehicles tested in this quartet) is "too soft in the chassis" and suffers from "too slow steering." Proving that it is indeed possible to pass the test, the Hyundai and Skoda completed the maneuver at the 44.7-mph figure required for a passing grade and the Tesla did it at 46.6 mph, albeit with less weight in the cargo area. It's not clear whether other versions of the Mustang Mach-E would pass the test. It's also unknown if Ford will make any changes to its chassis tuning or electronic stability control software, as some other automakers have done after a poor performance from Teknikens Varld, to improve its performance in the moose test. Related video:

Trucks, SUVs drive U.S. October new vehicle sales

Wed, Nov 1 2017

DETROIT — Major automakers posted mixed U.S. new vehicle sales in October on Wednesday, though America's love affair with high-margin pickup trucks and SUVs remained in full bloom as larger, pricier vehicles fared better than passenger cars. Auto industry publication WardsAuto put the seasonally-adjusted annualized rate (SAAR) for light vehicle sales in October at a robust level of 18 million units. But after a long boom cycle, carmakers are still ill-prepared for the slight decline in sales anticipated for full-year 2017 and have taken too few steps to trim production, said Doug Mehl, a partner in consultancy A.T. Kearney's automotive practice. "When you make a new vehicle, you have volume assumptions tagged to it, and who wants to be the guy who says, 'I'm going to make less of this really cool model'?" Mehl said. "But eventually the market is the reality, and it's going to force companies one way or other here." General Motors GM reported a sales drop of 2.2 percent for the month, with consumer sales down 6.6 percent. But sales of high-margin pickup trucks, sport utility vehicles and crossovers all rose. GM also cut its inventory of unsold vehicles — a source of concern for the market — slightly. The automaker has worked to reduce its volume of excess inventory, including through significant production shutdowns in the third quarter. GM had said its inventory would rise in October. "We are heading into the fourth quarter with good momentum, thanks to a strong U.S. economy and very strong pickup and crossover sales," said Kurt McNeil, GM vice president for U.S. sales operations. GM slightly reduced consumer discounts as a percentage of average transaction prices to 13.5 percent, from 13.7 percent in the third quarter. Industry experts believe consumer discounts above 10 percent of the average transaction price are unhealthy as they erode resale values and are unsustainable in the long term. Consultants J.D. Power and LMC said last week that based on preliminary October sales numbers, discounts have exceeded 10 percent in 15 of the past 16 months. Ford The U.S. auto industry posted record sales of 17.55 million vehicles in 2016. New sales received a strong boost in September as consumers replaced vehicles damaged in southeast Texas by Hurricane Harvey the previous month. Full-year 2017 sales are expected to be slightly lower than 2016.

The 1965 Ford Mustang could have looked a lot different

Fri, May 8 2020

The 1965 Ford Mustang is unquestionably an automotive design icon, and nearly every generation of Mustang has some connection to that original car. Because it's such a universally-known vehicle, we were amazed to see all the different designs that were being considered. Head of Ford's archives Ted Ryan recently shared photos of design proposals for the original Mustang on Twitter that he and Jamie Myler found, and we reached out to them to find out more. As Ryan initially noted, the photos were taken on August 19, 1962, and they are proposals for the Ford Mustang. Apparently Ford had committed to doing a Falcon-based youth-oriented car at this point, and it did have plans to launch the car in 1964 for the 1965 model year. But after having little success with early design proposals, the company asked all of its design studios — the Advanced Studio, Lincoln-Mercury Studio and Ford Studio — to submit proposals. With only about two years before the planned launch, Ford was understandably short on time, and it's believed that the studios only had a month to create and present these designs. Lincoln-Mercury design proposal View 8 Photos The majority of the designs, a total of five, came from the Advanced Studio, and part of this was because they already had a couple of concept designs in reserve it could present. Two other models representing three design possibilities came from Lincoln-Mercury, and just one model with two options came from Ford. The Advanced Studio proposals are shown in the gallery at the very top of this article, and the Lincoln-Mercury and Ford proposals are in the gallery directly above this paragraph. The Advanced Studio's most radical design is the one that was clearly related to the Mustang I concept that would be shown later that year with huge wraparound rear glass, turbine-inspired bumpers and enormous side scoops. The other proposals from the studio were more conservative, featuring simple lines, grilles reminiscent of the Falcon, and one even borrowing the jet-thruster-style taillights made famous on the Thunderbird. Lincoln-Mercury had some impressively bold designs, particularly its fastback that had buttresses to extend the shape all the way to the tail. This car had two different side trim possibilities. The other Lincoln-Mercury design was toned down a bit, but had two interesting possibilities for side detailing, as well as some crisp, low-profile tail fins.