2000 Ford Ranger on 2040-cars
117 E Broad St, Hemingway, South Carolina, United States
Engine:3.0L V6 12V MPFI OHV Flexible Fuel
VIN (Vehicle Identification Number): 1FTYR14VXYTA98680
Stock Num: UT2478
Make: Ford
Model: Ranger
Year: 2000
Options: Drive Type: RWD
Number of Doors: 2 Doors
Mileage: 200921
Our Used Vehicles generally come from locals in the area. We acquire and keep our trade in's to sell ourselves, this way we can pass the savings on to the consumer. Instead of buying from a random lot where they purchase their vehicles from sales and wholesalers, buy from us. Many of our vehicles were sold New and regularly serviced here, and we have the records to show it.
Ford Ranger for Sale
1999 ford ranger(US $2,495.00)
2003 ford ranger xlt fx4(US $11,996.00)
2008 ford ranger(US $9,064.00)
2011 ford ranger(US $20,989.00)
2009 ford ranger xlt(US $17,999.00)
2011 ford ranger xlt(US $18,700.00)
Auto Services in South Carolina
Wingard Towing Service ★★★★★
Sumter Tire Plus LLC ★★★★★
Stepp`s Garage & Towing ★★★★★
Stateline Auto Brokers ★★★★★
Patterson`s Towing & Recovery ★★★★★
Parish Automotive ★★★★★
Auto blog
Carmakers, NHTSA to unveil auto-emergency braking agreement tomorrow
Wed, Mar 16 2016Happy St. Patrick's Day Eve. Tomorrow, there will be green beer, corned beef and cabbage, and automatic emergency braking for all. Weird combo, we know. But on St. Patty's we can expect an official announcement from a pact of automakers making auto-braking systems standard equipment by 2022. That's per a report from Reuters, which cites three sources familiar with the plans. Originally announced in September 2015 by 10 automakers and the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, the agreement is expected to be even larger when the details are unveiled tomorrow. According to Reuters, the manufacturers of 99 percent of the US domestic market's vehicles will be represented by the new agreement. It's believed that standard AEB systems could prevent thousands of accidents across the country. Expect more on the official announcement when it's made. Related Video:
China's auto sales continue to drop
Sat, Sep 12 2015The days of unending growth of carmakers in China look to be over, and some analysts are even forecasting a net drop in volume this year, The Detroit News reports. After falling numbers in June and July, the China Association of Automobile Manufacturers tallied total sales, including trucks and buses, in August to 1.7 million, down 3 percent from 2014. There were some tiny specs of good news in China, but there's no turnaround in sight. Total vehicle sales from January to August are actually still up but only 2.6 percent. Like the rest of the world, SUVs are booming with numbers up 45.6 percent from the previous year. Honda managed a very impressive 50.7 percent gain on the strength of the CR-V and Vezel (the HR-V here), according to The Detroit News. Also, the country's domestic automakers, which generally offer less expensive products, posted a 2.5 percent growth in sales. The news continues to look bad for Detroit's automakers, though. Volume from General Motors dropped 4.8 percent in August, and Ford fell 3 percent in August. Both of them have invested significant amounts there in the past years. The vehicle industry in China grew last year, but there was burgeoning evidence of weakness. At the end of 2014, dealers there pushed back against huge inventories pushed by automakers. Even before the big drops began in June, GM saw the writing on the wall and started cutting prices. BMW responded to the slump by cutting back production to deal with the changing demand. News Source: The Detroit NewsImage Credit: Mark Schiefelbein / AP Photo BMW Ford GM Honda Car Buying
Tier 1 suppliers call GM the worst OEM to work with
Mon, 12 May 2014Among automakers with a big US presence, General Motors is the worst to work for, according to a new survey from Tier 1 automotive suppliers, conducted by Planning Perspectives, Inc.
The Detroit-based manufacturer, which has been under fire following the ignition switch recall and its accompanying scandal, finished behind six other automakers with big US manufacturing operations. Suppliers had issues with trust and communications, as well as intellectual property protection. GM was also the least likely to allow suppliers to raise their prices in the face of unexpected increases in material cost, all of which contributed to 55 percent of suppliers saying their relationship with GM was "poor to very poor."
GM's cross-town competitors didn't fare much better. Chrysler finished in fifth place, ahead of GM and behind Dearborn-based Ford, which was passed for third place this year by Nissan. Toyota took the top marks, while Honda captured second place.