1999 Ford Ranger Ext Cab Xlt 3.0l Automatic, Great Work Truck on 2040-cars
East Moline, Illinois, United States
Engine:3.0L 182Cu. In. V6 FLEX OHV Naturally Aspirated
Body Type:Pickup Truck
Vehicle Title:Clear
Exterior Color: Red
Make: Ford
Interior Color: Gray
Model: Ranger
Number of Cylinders: 6
Trim: XLT Extended Cab Pickup 2-Door
Drive Type: RWD
Cab Type (For Trucks Only): Extended Cab
Mileage: 148,000
1999 Ford Ranger EXT Cab XLT 3.0L Automatic 148.000 miles. Great work truck. Very good runner. Good Rubber, good glass. COLD AIR, NO BODY RUST, bed liner, rear slider window. New alternator this early summer... Sorry, no tilt, cruise, electric windows or door locks.
Ive had the truck for 4 years and I put on 4000 miles. Ive used synthetic oil since ive own it and has 3000 miles left on oil change. Ive also put on 4 newer tires. 225/15 on the front and 235/15 on the back. I added the bed liner.
Now for the issues........... The truck has minor dings, dents, paint chips, scratches. The interior is in good shape but could use a shampooing on the seats and carpet. Dome light removed due to passenger door open sensor sometimes stays on. Front bumper was tweaked and flaking rust. Also check engine light due to EGR Air Flow Sensor, Bumper tweaked and Air bags was deployed by the previous owner due to running over a mail box poll. Truck has a minor tremor 55mph and above, MIDAS Muffler said it was perhaps a tire, wheel or rodar out of balance and the front suspension and steering checked out good.
Ive described this vehicle the best I could and as you can see by my feedback I am a good eBayer and try to be a straight shooter as I can.
Now for the after auction details.... I do expect payment within 7 days. C@SH Payment in person or a W@lm@rt M0n3y 0rd3r. If you need to have the vehicle shipped I can take it to a local shipping center at no extra charge. I will hold the vehicle for free storage for up to 2 weeks. vehicle sold as is with no warranty.
Ford Ranger for Sale
2004 ford ranger edge extended cab pickup 2-door 4.0l(US $8,500.00)
2001 ford ranger edge extended cab pickup 4-door 3.0l(US $1,500.00)
1994 ford ranger splash tubbed and lowered 27000 original miles(US $8,500.00)
1996 ford ranger xlt standard cab pickup 2-door 4.0l(US $1,950.00)
1997 ford ranger xlt 4x4 supercab 2d 4.0l v6(US $4,200.00)
1985 ford ranger stx(US $700.00)
Auto Services in Illinois
World Class Motor Cars ★★★★★
Wilkins Hyundai-Mazda ★★★★★
Unibody ★★★★★
Turpin Chevrolet Inc ★★★★★
Tuffy Auto Service Centers ★★★★★
Triple T Car Wash Lube & Detail Center ★★★★★
Auto blog
2016 Ford Mustang SVT hides big power under its domed hood
Tue, 17 Jun 2014With a number of 2015 Ford Mustang versions finally available to configure, the fun of speculating about next year's high-performance 'Stang can now begin. It looks like Ford has something seriously fun planned too. One of our spy photographers just snapped some fresh pics of the 2016 Mustang SVT, which is believed to be hiding the final body shape under all of that heavy camouflage.
Ford clearly doesn't want prying eyes looking at its new pride and joy. It would be hard to put much more obfuscation on a car than this one wears - it even has mesh baffles around the exhausts to conceal how many there are and panels over the wheels to hide their design. However, the Blue Oval can't keep everything a secret. The biggest clue that something special is hidden underneath is the massive hood bulge and vent in front of it. Clearly, whatever is under there is hungry for cool air. The shape of the camo indicates that there may be fender vents on each side, and there are also obscured outlets behind the front wheels likely to pull cool air through the brakes. At the rear, the concealment does its job, making it hard to observe any big changes. The fact that Ford wants it kept such a secret might indicate something, though.
A few photos of the interior show far less cover than the outside. You can easily make out the model's 6,500 rpm redline with a possible 7,000 rpm over-rev function. The big Recaro sport seats also look quite supportive.
Vile Gossip | Adventures in tire testing
Fri, Oct 13 2017Jean Jennings has been writing about cars for more than 30 years, after stints as a taxicab driver and as a mechanic in the Chrysler Proving Grounds Impact Lab. She was a staff writer at Car and Driver magazine, the first executive editor and former president and editor-in-chief of Automobile Magazine , the founder of the blog Jean Knows Cars and former automotive correspondent for Good Morning America . She has lifetime awards from both the Motor Press Guild and the New England Motor Press Association. This is her first column for Autoblog — look for more Vile Gossip in the future. I began writing at Car and Driver magazine back in its golden age in the 1970s, before I'd actually read it. I knew very little about cars. The only magazine I read religiously was Four Wheeler because I owned big trucks and liked to go off-roading with my Chrysler Proving Grounds friends. My vast 10 years of driving experience up to that point (high-speed dirt-road idiot, taxicab driver, Chrysler Proving Grounds test driver) had less bearing on my being hired at Car and Driver than the fact that the editor just wanted to rile up the all-male staff. He didn't need me for that. They were already in full dudgeon when I arrived. They'd just spent a chunk of time testing a stack of tires for their big tire-test issue, and the editor-in-chief was toe-to-toe with the technical editor over the rankings of the top 10 tires. It was loud, and it was angry. I had no idea that car magazines tested tires. Cab driving had led me to believe that airing up a tire and changing a flat was all you needed to know. I changed so many flats on that cab, I eventually wound up in front of a live audience on the " Oprah Winfrey Show" demonstrating my brilliance with a jack and a tire iron. My point, of course, is that tires are more controversial, and also more essential, than you'd think. My other point is that it's good to get worked up about the subject, but not quite so good to let yourself be seen, as I did, on my hands and knees with my ass up in the air on national TV. This is how I prefer to test a tire: First, pick a top brand. Then accept their invitation to try and beat the crap out of their tire. I chose Yokohama, celebrating its 100th anniversary this year. The big news for them was the GEOLANDER M/T G003!
Ford Mustang Mach-E fails Sweden's moose test
Wed, Sep 29 2021The infamous moose test has claimed another casualty. This time it's the Ford Mustang Mach-E AWD Long Range, which was tested in an electric four-way alongside the Tesla Model Y, Hyundai Ioniq 5 and Skoda Enyaq iV (an electric utility vehicle closely related to the Volkswagen ID.4 that is sold in the United States). According to the Swedish testers at Teknikens Varld, Ford's electric car not only failed to hit the speed necessary for a passing grade, it didn't perform well at slower speeds, either. To pass the outlet's moose test, a car has to complete a rapid left-right-straight S-shaped pattern marked by cones at a speed of at least 72 km/h (44.7 miles per hour). The test is designed to mimic the type of avoidance maneuver a driver would have to take in order to avoid hitting something that wandered into the road, which in Sweden may be a moose but could just as easily be a deer or some other member of the animal kingdom elsewhere in the world, or possibly a child or car backing into the motorway. Not only is the maneuver very aggressive, it's also performed with weights belted into each seat and more weight added to the cargo area to hit the vehicle's maximum allowable carrying capacity. The Mustang Mach-E only managed to complete the moose test at 68 km/h (42.3 mph), well below the passing-grade threshold. Even at much lower speeds, Teknikens Varld says the Mach-E (which boasts the highest carrying capacity and was therefore loaded with more weight than the rest of the vehicles tested in this quartet) is "too soft in the chassis" and suffers from "too slow steering." Proving that it is indeed possible to pass the test, the Hyundai and Skoda completed the maneuver at the 44.7-mph figure required for a passing grade and the Tesla did it at 46.6 mph, albeit with less weight in the cargo area. It's not clear whether other versions of the Mustang Mach-E would pass the test. It's also unknown if Ford will make any changes to its chassis tuning or electronic stability control software, as some other automakers have done after a poor performance from Teknikens Varld, to improve its performance in the moose test. Related video:








