Find or Sell Used Cars, Trucks, and SUVs in USA

1963 Ford Econoline Pickup - E100 - Rare! Nice Project Vehicle! Look! on 2040-cars

US $4,000.00
Year:1963 Mileage:91778 Color: Red Primer /
 Red Vinyl
Location:

Ottawa, Kansas, United States

Ottawa, Kansas, United States
Advertising:
Transmission:Automatic
Body Type:Pickup Truck
Engine:289 HP
Vehicle Title:Clear
Fuel Type:Gasoline
For Sale By:Dealer
VIN: E10TH327139 Year: 1963
Interior Color: Red Vinyl
Make: Ford
Number of Cylinders: 8
Model: Other Pickups
Trim: Pickup
Cab Type (For Trucks Only): Regular Cab
Drive Type: Regular
Mileage: 91,778
Sub Model: E100 Pickup
Exterior Color: Red Primer
Warranty: Vehicle does NOT have an existing warranty
Condition: UsedA vehicle is considered used if it has been registered and issued a title. Used vehicles have had at least one previous owner. The condition of the exterior, interior and engine can vary depending on the vehicle's history. See the seller's listing for full details and description of any imperfections.Seller Notes:"Vehicle is a project vehicle in need of a full restoration. Mechanically, the vehicle is strong and sound."

For your consideration:


1963 Ford Econoline E100 pickup - 3 window. This is a rare and unique vehicle!

This particular example is in need of a new, loving owner and a full restoration.  The previous owner states that the engine had been rebuilt while in his possession - a 289 ci engine with a 302 crank, which typically indicates a 289 HP. There's no doubt about it - this little buggy will scoot with the 289 in it. Engine and transmission are strong.

I believe the transmission to be a C4 (automatic), but there is a chance that it is a C6.

Interior is fair, upholstery is decent.

Underneath, the frame rails are clean and without any serious rust (nothing rusted through) - they may be some surface rust.

As seen in the photos, there are some rust issues on the body of the pick up in all of the common areas of these early Fords - the door sills, rocker panels and quarters.

Please look at all the photos carefully and ask ALL questions prior to purchase or submitting an offer.

This vehicle is being listed for sale by Leonard's Used Cars and Truck in Ottawa, KS, and is also for sale locally on the car lot. We have been in business in the same town for 42 years and our word and integrity is our honor and reason for longevity.
Please also take a look at my feedback and buy with confidence.

You may contact the dealer, Leonard Cheasbro, directly at 785-229-9517 with questions.

A $500 non-refundable deposit is due immediately and the balance of the purchase is due within 5 days of listing end, by means of cashier's check, bank loan check or other certified funds. No checks or money orders. Cash in person is fine. While the deposit is payable via PayPal, the balance should be handled with overnight delivery (PayPal fees are too exorbitant for large purchases/sales).

Buyer is solely responsible for all shipping and handling arrangements.

Thank you for looking!

Auto Services in Kansas

X-Treme Automotive L.L.C. ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Parts & Supplies, Tire Dealers
Address: 424 N Washington St, Eastborough
Phone: (316) 265-6245

Vilela Auto Body ★★★★★

Automobile Body Repairing & Painting, Used & Rebuilt Auto Parts, Windshield Repair
Address: 103 S Elm St, Carona
Phone: (620) 231-6350

Salazar Auto Repair ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service
Address: 917 Herald St, Pierceville
Phone: (620) 275-2104

Roe Body Shop ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Body Repairing & Painting
Address: 4715 Roe Pkwy, Westwood
Phone: (913) 722-2545

Rich Industries Auto Parts ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Parts & Supplies, Used & Rebuilt Auto Parts
Address: 4120 Winchester Ave, Tonganoxie
Phone: (816) 482-3672

Ray`s Muffler & Auto Repair ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Parts & Supplies, Mufflers & Exhaust Systems
Address: 4602 NW Gateway Ave, Mission
Phone: (816) 587-9101

Auto blog

Motor Trend pits Camaro 1LE vs Mustang with Performance Pack, surprises ensue

Thu, 16 Oct 2014

With the 2015 Ford Mustang firmly on the scene, the inevitable comparisons with its arch rival, the 2015 Chevrolet Camaro are just starting to trickle out. Over the next several months, you're likely to be inundated by every outlet's muscle car comparison, whether it be the turbocharged Ford against the V6 Chevy, a V8-powered convertible comparo or what we have here, a competition between each vehicle's performance upgrade.
Motor Trend has pitted the Camaro SS 1LE against a Mustang with the GT Performance Pack for a comprehensive series of comparisons on the test stage, street and finally, at Willow Springs with ace Randy Pobst behind the wheel. As per usual, we aren't about to spoil this one for you.
So, hit the play button, have a look and then let us know what you think in Comments.

Top torque-to-weight ratios under $100k, $50k and $25k

Tue, 07 Oct 2014

Horsepower may steal a lot of headlines, but the always-more-complex torque figure is often a critical one for both the workingman and the motoring playboy. The measure of rotational force represents the twist that can liquefy one's tires or haul one's horse trailer. Good stuff.
It follows then, that as with the horsepower-to-weight list that we assembled for you a few months ago, a list of cars that offer the most pound-feet with the fewest pounds to carry, is an interesting one to break down. Sure, there's a big difference in how the torque is applied from a turbocharged six-cylinder in a Swedish luxury sedan and a massive heavy-duty truck's turbo-diesel. But being the car/stat geeks that we are, we think it's kinda neat that those two vehicles rank near each other where torque and weight intersect.
As with the horsepower list, we've given you figures as pounds per every one pound-foot. Again broken down into broad price categories, we've got a mixed bag of 2014 and 2015 models here, too. Every effort has been made to select the most up-to-date prices and specs, and we've also to omitted some '14 cars that won't be re-upped after the ongoing yearly changeover.

2022 Rivian R1T vs. 2022 Ford F-150 Lightning vs. GMC Hummer EV Pickup | How they compare on paper

Tue, Sep 28 2021

The 2022 Rivian R1T has arrived, ushering in the era of the production electric pickup truck. The Rivian reviews are in, and spoiler alert: They're pretty good. Curious how the new battery-powered truck stacks up to its forthcoming competitors? Well, you've come to the right place. Rivian beat all of Detroit's big automakers to market in the half-ton segment, but probably not by the margin the startup would have liked. Ford's answer is the F-150 Lightning, which is due to enter production early next year, coming hot on the heels of GM's first entry into the space – the GMC Hummer EV pickup – which is scheduled to come off the line late this fall. While all three are pickups, they're aimed at distinctly different buyers, as a perusal of their specifications will reveal. Let's have a look, shall we?   Disclaimer: Before we dive in on this one, we'd like to note that while we've made our best effort to verify the specs provided, the Rivian is brand-new and the others are still in the prototype phase. Some of these figures may be inaccurate or may simply change before production. This is all hypothetical until you can actually cross-shop them anyway, right? Cool. End disclaimer. Let's start with the powertrains. They're all battery-electric trucks engineered on a modular rear-wheel-drive configuration engineered to accommodate (theoretically, anyway) up to four electric drive units. Rivian actually makes the most use of this with a quad-motor setup producing 835 horsepower and 908 pound-feet of torque with its high-output initial model. GMC's three-motor Hummer has the R1T beat with its estimated 1,000-horsepower output, while Ford's (also three-motor) comes in with a far more modest 563 horses. This is an excellent illustration of our above point that these are not all engineered for the same crowd. Ford's F-150, which comes in at a lower price point, is meant to be far more mainstream, as its power output suggests.  This theme continues when we look at the dimensions. Despite the image "Hummer" may conjure, GMC's entry actually needs the shallowest parking space. The Rivian is right behind it, with the work-truck-spec Ford extending more than a foot longer than either. What the Hummer lacks in length, it makes up for in girth. It's the widest by a good 5 inches. The Rivian is only slightly pudgier than the F-150, but it's much closer at that end of the scale.