Find or Sell Used Cars, Trucks, and SUVs in USA

1968 Ford Mustang Gt on 2040-cars

US $27,800.00
Year:1968 Mileage:68000 Color: Green /
 Black
Location:

Harrisonburg, Virginia, United States

Harrisonburg, Virginia, United States
Advertising:

If you have more questions or want more details please email : wondawaaleff@ukme.com .

1968 Mustang S Code GT, complete rotisserie restored. Has a rebuilt matching number 390 motor, 4 sp trans. All the drive train is original to the car, Everything on the car either is new or has been restored, tried to use as many of the original parts as possible. This is rare bench seat car. There were only 1,079 built in 1968, a little over 500 of them were GT's. Was told that this car was an armrest delete car which would make it very rare but have not found any documentation to prove it but this car with that being said is still a one of one car. It was the only one built in 1968 with this paint and trim code which is lime gold with the black out hood. shows just how rare this car really is. The car is beautiful.

Auto Services in Virginia

Wilson`s Auto Repair ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service
Address: 1925 E Pembroke Ave, Fort-Monroe
Phone: (757) 727-0008

Wicomico Auto Body ★★★★★

Automobile Body Repairing & Painting, Truck Body Repair & Painting
Address: 5345 Jessie Dupont Memorial Hwy, Heathsville
Phone: (804) 580-8419

Valley Collision Repair Inc ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Body Repairing & Painting, Automobile Restoration-Antique & Classic
Address: 23101 Old Valley Pike, Berryville
Phone: (540) 459-2005

Toyota of Stafford ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, New Car Dealers, Used Car Dealers
Address: 95 Garrisonville Rd, Ruby
Phone: (888) 607-9714

Tire City New & Used tires & Affordable Auto Repair ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Tire Dealers, Machine Shops
Address: 3655 N Military Hwy, Norfolk
Phone: (757) 588-5660

The Brake Squad - Mobile Brake Repair Service ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Repair Referral Service, Brake Repair
Address: Fairfax
Phone: (703) 994-2773

Auto blog

2020 Ford Escape hybrids vs other crossover fuel sippers: How they compare on paper

Wed, Apr 3 2019

Along with a new generation of Escape, Ford also reintroduced the world to the 2020 Ford Escape Hybrid. And if that weren't enough, Ford is adding a plug-in hybrid version. This is a sign of the times: people are more crossover crazy than ever, but are also seeking ways to use less fuel, whether it's for environmental or purely money-motivated reasons. The Ford hybrids aren't the only fuel-efficient compact crossovers on the market. They will be going head-to-head with conventional hybrids including the 2019 Kia Niro, 2019 Nissan Rogue Hybrid and 2019 Toyota RAV4 Hybrid. There are other plug-in hybrids including the 2019 Subaru Crosstrek PHEV, 2019 Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV and the plug-in version of the 2019 Kia Niro. There are even a couple diesels in the form of the 2019 Chevy Equinox and 2019 GMC Terrain. So we've rounded up the details on all these crossovers to see who leads and lags in criteria such as power, fuel efficiency, space and price. Check out all their details below. 2019 Subaru Crosstrek Hybrid View 68 Photos How do their engines and fuel economy compare? Conventional Hybrids and Diesels Let's face it, if you're buying one of these crossovers, one of the things that matters most to you is just how frugal with fuel they are. We'll start off with the conventional hybrids and diesels, and the clear victor is the Kia Niro, which in base FE trim, manages to hit 50 mpg combined. This is thanks to it sharing its powertrain with the Hyundai Ioniq, the Hyundai equivalent of the Toyota Prius. Buyers should take note that only the FE returns such high fuel economy. The LX and EX drop to 49 mpg, and the S Touring and Touring get 43. Even then, the least efficient Niro is the most efficient of the normal hybrids and diesels. It is nearly the least powerful, though, with 139 horsepower. Just behind it is the Toyota RAV4 Hybrid. It delivers 40 mpg combined, and it has an ace up its sleeve: it comes standard with all-wheel drive. Every other vehicle in this powertrain group has front drive standard, and the Niro isn't available with all-wheel drive at all. If that weren't enough, the RAV4 Hybrid also boasts the most power at 219 horses. While we can't say anything about Escape Hybrid fuel economy, we do know that it will make 198 horsepower, which is close to the class-leading RAV4. The least powerful of these is the Equinox and Terrain, and they return the worst fuel economy at 32 mpg.

IIHS Crash-tests Expose American Muscle Cars' Weaknesses | Autoblog Minute

Thu, Jun 2 2016

Turns out American muscle cars aren?t that strong according to IIHS crash tests. The Insurance Institute for Highway Safety put three iconic American sports cars through a range of performance crash tests. Chevrolet Dodge Ford Autoblog Minute Videos Original Video crash test camaro challenger

Ford recalls 434k vehicles for several unrelated issues

Mon, 07 Apr 2014

It seems that the hard winter in much of the country has been as rough on some Fords as it has on many people. The Blue Oval is recalling roughly 434,000 vehicles in two separate recalls, and one of them partially caused by the salt used to melt the snow on roads.
The first recall covers 385,750 2001-2004 Escape models in the Midwest, Northeast and Canada because a subframe could rust and eventually fail. This is partially due to the road salt used in those areas, and about 349,000 of the affected vehicles are in the US. To remedy the problem, dealers are installing a reinforcement cross brace on the frame to strengthen them. There has been one crash caused by the failure but no injuries. According to The Detroit News, this is not the first rust-related recall for Ford. It estimates the company has repaired over two million vehicles since 2010 for problems on vehicles related to the iron oxide, including the rear wheel wells of the Freestar minivan.
The second recall covers 48,950 2013-2014 Ford Fusion, Escape, C-MAX and Lincoln MKZ models because welds in their seatbacks don't meet National Highway Traffic Safety Administration standards. The fault affects the front seats, and the sub-standard welds joining the setback to the recliner could increase the chance on injury. There have been no reported injuries or accidents caused by the problem, but there are 42,972 affected vehicles in the US and 4,744 in Canada.