Find or Sell Used Cars, Trucks, and SUVs in USA

1923 Ford Bucket T Truck Street Rod 302 Automatic on 2040-cars

Year:1923 Mileage:1259 Color: Red /
 White
Location:

Des Moines, Iowa, United States

Des Moines, Iowa, United States
Advertising:
Transmission:Automatic
Body Type:Pickup Truck
Engine:302
Vehicle Title:Clear
Fuel Type:Gasoline
For Sale By:Dealer
VIN: DRMVB0000154199MO Year: 1923
Model: Model T
Trim: Bucket T
Cab Type (For Trucks Only): Regular Cab
Drive Type: automatic
Mileage: 1,259
Exterior Color: Red
Disability Equipped: No
Interior Color: White
Warranty: Vehicle does NOT have an existing warranty
Number of Cylinders: 8
Condition: Used: A vehicle is considered used if it has been registered and issued a title. Used vehicles have had at least one previous owner. The condition of the exterior, interior and engine can vary depending on the vehicle's history. See the seller's listing for full details and description of any imperfections. ... 

This bucket T has a 1995 Mustang 302 HO engine with a rebuilt 1985 Mustang AOD transmission with a new torque converter.  Rear axle is from a 1966 Mustang. Total weight is 2100 lbs, wheelbase 124 3/4 inches.  The body was stretched 12 inches, the frame was stretched 14 inches.  Front axle has a super glide front leaf spring.  Transmission has Lokar shifter, kickdown cable, and dip stick.  Holley electric fuel pump, Speedway nostalgic steering column, with signals.  Painless 12 circuit wiring harness.  39 Ford tail lights, Dietz headlights.  Bomber seats are genuine Douglas aircraft issue.  Fuel lines and Trans lines are braided stainless steel.  Vintage wheels and caps with BF Goodrich tires, 185/70/15 fronts and 255/70/15 rears.  The top half of the windshield is there with the brackets, we have it off because we like the look.  Located in Des Moines, IA it will be sold as-is on a regular Iowa title.  Deposit may be made by paypal, balance must be wire transfer, cash.  We can assist in loading.

Auto Services in Iowa

Trail`s End Auto and Truck Salvage ★★★★★

Automobile Parts & Supplies, Used & Rebuilt Auto Parts, Automobile Salvage
Address: 1600 NE 44th Ave, Berwick
Phone: (866) 595-6470

Shaffer`s Auto Body Co. Inc ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Body Repairing & Painting, Brake Repair
Address: 1712 E Lincoln Way, Huxley
Phone: (515) 509-2535

Schuling Hitch Company ★★★★★

Automobile Parts & Supplies, Trailer Hitches, Automobile Accessories
Address: 5067 NW 2nd St, West-Des-Moines
Phone: (866) 595-6470

Quality Car Care ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Diagnostic Service, Automobile Inspection Stations & Services
Address: 900 Highway 965 NE Unit #6, Oakdale
Phone: (319) 626-2500

Phillip`s Auto Clinic ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Tire Dealers
Address: 200 S Jefferson St, Mount-Pleasant
Phone: (319) 385-2769

Orlando`s Automotive ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service
Address: 5245 NW Beaver Dr # B, Johnston
Phone: (515) 331-1922

Auto blog

Ford board pushing Mulally for decision amidst fears story is drowning out other news

Thu, 12 Dec 2013

Automakers and their executives rarely like to divulge information regarding future goings on, but the board of directors at Ford sound like they're getting a little antsy about chief executive officer Alan Mulally and his plans for 2014.
According to Reuters, as news of Mulally's possible departure to Microsoft continues to swirl, Ford's board is looking to push the affable executive to make a decision about his future sooner rather than later. Apparently, the board is growing concerned that this will-he/won't-he drama may end up distracting the media from covering Ford's other big news events next year - items like the debut of key all-new products like the Mustang and F-150.
So far, the picture for Mulally's eventual successor remains fuzzy, but it's understood that the leading candidate remains the company's chief operating officer, Mark Fields. Just recently, we heard that Mulally will stay until the end of 2014, but a few months ago, Ford seemed open to the idea of him stepping down earlier than that.

Lexus tops JD Power Vehicle Dependability Study again, Buick bests Toyota

Wed, Feb 25 2015

It shouldn't surprise anyone, but Lexus has once again taken the top spot in JD Power's Vehicle Dependability Study. That'd be the Japanese luxury brand's fourth straight year at the top of table. The big news, though, is the rise of Buick. General Motor's near-premium brand beat out Toyota to take second place, with 110 problems per 100 vehicles compared to Toyota's 111 problems. Lexus owners only reported 89 problems per 100 vehicles. Besides Buick's three-position jump, Scion enjoyed a major improvement, jumping 13 positions from 2014. Ram and Mitsubishi made big gains, as well, moving up 11 and 10 positions, respectively. In terms of individual segments, GM and Toyota both excelled, taking home seven segment awards each. The study wasn't good news for all involved, though. A number of popular automakers finished below the industry average of 147 problems per 100 vehicles, including Subaru, (157PP100), Volkswagen (165PP100), Ford/Hyundai (188PP100 each) and Mini (193PP100). The biggest losers (by a tremendous margin, we might add) were Land Rover and Fiat, recording 258 and 273 problems per 100 vehicles. The next closest brand was Jeep, with 197PP100. While the Vehicle Dependability Study uses the same measurement system as the Initial Quality Survey, the two metrics analyze very different things. The VDS looks at problems experienced by original owners of model year 2012 vehicles over the past 12 months, while the oft-quoted IQS focuses on problems in the first 90 days of new-vehicle ownership. Like the IQS, though, the VDS has a rather broad definition of what a problem is. Because of that, a low score from JD Power is no guarantee of extreme unreliability, so much as just poor design. In this most recent study, the two most reported problems focused on Bluetooth connectivity and the voice-command systems. The former leaves plenty of room for user error due to poor design (particularly true of the Bluetooth systems on the low-scoring Fords, Volkswagens and Subarus), while the second is something JD Power has already confirmed as being universally terrible. That makes means that while these studies are important, they shouldn't be taken as gospel when it comes to automotive reliability. News Source: JD PowerImage Credit: Copyright 2015 Jeremy Korzeniewski / AOL Buick Fiat Ford GM Hyundai Jeep Land Rover Lexus MINI Mitsubishi RAM Scion Subaru Toyota Volkswagen Auto Repair Ownership study

Compact SUV Comparison: Specs, pics and reviews of every brand's crossover

Wed, Jul 25 2018

Honda CR-V vs Toyota RAV4. Chevy Equinox vs Ford Escape. Mazda CX-5 vs Subaru Forester. Whichever combinations of compact crossover SUV you're considering, there's probably a comparison test or chart out there to read. Heck, you can even create a three-car comparison yourself here at Autoblog. However, if you want a bunch of that information all in one convenient place, well, here it is. Our mega comparison of specs, features and photos of compact SUV entries from every mainstream manufacturer that sells them. That includes the 2018 Chevrolet Equinox, 2018 Ford Escape, 2018 GMC Terrain, 2018 Honda CR-V, 2018 Hyundai Tucson, 2019 Jeep Cherokee (it's already on sale with notable changes from 2018), 2018 Jeep Compass, 2018 Kia Sportage, 2018 Mazda CX-5, 2018 Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross (none of Mitsu's SUVs are perfect fits for this segment, so we deemed the MEC the most competitive fit), 2018 Nissan Rogue, 2018 Subaru Forester, 2018 Toyota RAV4 and 2018 Volkswagen Tiguan. We can update this comparison as more information about 2019 models is released, most notably the Forester and RAV4. Now, there are certainly some models that are smaller (Nissan Rogue Sport) or larger (Kia Sorento) that could also be considered, but we figured it was wise to stick with those in this sweet spot of comparable size and price. We also included links to Autoblog reviews, buying guides and smaller comparisons. Engines and Transmissions With rare exception, this segment features four-cylinder power. Sometimes it's turbocharged, often its not, but standard engine outputs are generally in the same ballpark. Therefore, we'd recommend focusing on torque output, as it's what will make a difference around town or when passing, and weighing that versus fuel economy (the Chevy Equinox, GMC Terrain, Honda CR-V and Mazda CX-5 make particularly strong cases in this regard). Many drivers aren't too fond of continuously variable transmissions (CVT), either, so that's another thing to consider and note during a test drive. As you can see, several models are available with performance upgrades. Besides the Jeep Cherokee's available V6, all are more powerful turbocharged four-cylinder engines. The exception to this would be the Honda CR-V and Ford Escape, as their 1.5-liter turbo engines don't prioritize performance. Instead, they serve as overall upgrades to the base naturally aspirated engines standard on only their base trim levels (CR-V LX and Escape S).