2011 Ford Fiesta Ses on 2040-cars
514 West Walnut, Paris, Arkansas, United States
Engine:1.6L I4 16V MPFI DOHC
Transmission:6-Speed Automatic with Auto-Shift
VIN (Vehicle Identification Number): 3FADP4FJ6BM186153
Stock Num: A1458C
Make: Ford
Model: Fiesta SES
Year: 2011
Exterior Color: Red
Options: Drive Type: FWD
Number of Doors: 4 Doors
Mileage: 56300
Come to the experts! Red and Ready! 5 year, 60,000 mile warranty. Here at Paris Ford Inc, we try to make the purchase process as easy and hassle free as possible. We encourage you to experience this for yourself when you come to look at this outstanding-looking 2011 Ford Fiesta. Consumer Guide Subcompact Car Best Buy. New Car Test Drive called it ...a fresh entry in an increasingly popular and important market, the small, fuel efficient runabout... This great Ford Fiesta would look so much better waiting for you in your driveway instead of sitting here idly on our lot. As usual, it's ready...Come and get it! Internet pricing is subject to change. It is a buy outright price. Prices may vary at dealership location. Pricing goes through a 3rd party vendor, therefore we are not responsible for errors.
Ford Fiesta for Sale
2011 ford fiesta se
2014 ford fiesta se(US $17,790.00)
2012 ford fiesta sel(US $13,997.00)
2014 ford fiesta se(US $17,500.00)
2012 ford fiesta se(US $12,988.00)
2014 ford fiesta se(US $18,425.00)
Auto Services in Arkansas
Roberts Brothers Tire Service ★★★★★
Precision Automotive ★★★★★
Money Tree ★★★★★
Meineke Car Care Center ★★★★★
Marks Auto Repair ★★★★★
Hodges Wrecker Service ★★★★★
Auto blog
Ford debuts Fusion NASCAR racer that edges closer to stock [w/video]
Wed, 20 Feb 2013The sixth-generation NASCAR Sprint Cup racecar, which will make its competition debut at the 2013 Daytona 500 this weekend, marks the closest thing to a "stock car" that the sport has seen in more than 20 years. No longer using just stickers to distinguish the different brands, the image above shows the lengths NASCAR and automakers went in order to create a racecar design that more closely resembles the individual cars they represent.
Ford, one of the more open and vocal OEMs regarding the Gen6 car's development, is giving us a closer look at its racing version of the Fusion with a pretty revealing side-by-side comparison with last years' racer (click above for an expanded view). Aside from the more realistic front end and production-like body lines, the overall shape, dimensions and proportions have also been designed to give the racecar a more stock appearance. Most of the new racer was designed by the Ford Design Center, which the automaker says was the first time it has been so involved in the design process since the 1960s. Of course, one area the Sprint Cup Fusion really differs from the production Fusion is its Ford Racing 5.8-liter V8 producing around 850 hp. Can you say Fusion SVT?
Scroll down for a quick video from Ford Racing showing a production Fusion morph into a Cup car.
The fascinating forgotten civil defense history of Mister Softee trucks
Mon, 26 Aug 2013Hemmings came across an interesting article from the Throwin' Wrenches blog about the intersection of ice cream, cars and civic duty in America's late 1950s. In particular, it focuses on the Mister Softee trucks, which criss-crossed neighborhoods of the eastern US serving ice cream. Looking past the ultra-durable vehicles used - heavy-duty Ford-based chassis, for what it's worth - the article delves into some deeper national-security territory.
See, Mister Softee truck owners were voluntary members of the Civil Defense, thanks to all the useful stuff (potable water, generators, freezers and fridges) that the machines carried with them for serving ice cream. Click over to Throwin' Wrenches for the full run down of how Mister Softee would have stepped in to help fight if the Cold War ever turned a little hotter.
2016: The year of the autonomous-car promise
Mon, Jan 2 2017About half of the news we covered this year related in some way to The Great Autonomous Future, or at least it seemed that way. If you listen to automakers, by 2020 everyone will be driving (riding?) around in self-driving cars. But what will they look like, how will we make the transition from driven to driverless, and how will laws and infrastructure adapt? We got very few answers to those questions, and instead were handed big promises, vague timelines, and a dose of misdirection by automakers. There has been a lot of talk, but we still don't know that much about these proposed vehicles, which are at least three years off. That's half a development cycle in this industry. We generally only start to get an idea of what a company will build about two years before it goes on sale. So instead of concrete information about autonomous cars, 2016 has brought us a lot of promises, many in the form of concept cars. They have popped up from just about every automaker accompanied by the CEO's pledge to deliver a Level 4 autonomous, all-electric model (usually a crossover) in a few years. It's very easy to say that a static design study sitting on a stage will be able to drive itself while projecting a movie on the windshield, but it's another thing entirely to make good on that promise. With a few exceptions, 2016 has been stuck in the promising stage. It's a strange thing, really; automakers are famous for responding with "we don't discuss future product" whenever we ask about models or variants known to be in the pipeline, yet when it comes to self-driving electric wondermobiles, companies have been falling all over themselves to let us know that theirs is coming soon, it'll be oh so great, and, hey, that makes them a mobility company now, not just an automaker. A lot of this is posturing and marketing, showing the public, shareholders, and the rest of the industry that "we're making one, too, we swear!" It has set off a domino effect – once a few companies make the guarantee, the rest feel forced to throw out a grandiose yet vague plan for an unknown future. And indeed there are usually scant details to go along with such announcements – an imprecise mileage estimate here, or a far-off, percentage-based goal there. Instead of useful discussion of future product, we get demonstrations of test mules, announcements of big R&D budgets and new test centers they'll fund, those futuristic concept cars, and, yeah, more promises.