Find or Sell Used Cars, Trucks, and SUVs in USA

2015 Ford F350 Lariat on 2040-cars

US $61,086.00
Year:2015 Mileage:19 Color: Tuxedo Black Metallic /
 Leather 40/Console/40 Seat Adobe
Location:

600 Ohio Pike, Cincinnati, Ohio, United States

600 Ohio Pike, Cincinnati, Ohio, United States
Advertising:
Fuel Type:Diesel
Engine:Intercooled Turbo Diesel V-8 6.7 L/406
Transmission:6-Speed Automatic w/OD
Condition: New
VIN (Vehicle Identification Number): 1FT8W3BT0FEA18052
Stock Num: T15-115
Make: Ford
Model: F350 Lariat
Year: 2015
Exterior Color: Tuxedo Black Metallic
Interior Color: Leather 40/Console/40 Seat Adobe
Options:
  • 5TH WHEEL/GOOSENECK HITCH PREP PACKAGE-inc: 5 pickup bed attachment points w/plugs1 frame under-bed cross member and 1 integrated 7-pin connector on driver's side pickup bed wall5th wheel hitch compatibility: the 5th Wheel/Gooseneck Prep Package (53W) is compatible w/the factory orderable 5th Wheel Hitch Kit (15K) and dealer-installed Ford custom accessories 5th Wheel Hitch Kit by Reese - part #BC3Z-19D520-A (8ft box only)The prep package is also compatible w/Reese Signature Series 5th wheel hitch kits updated w/a new Leg Service Kit - part #BC3Z-A00A25-A (8ft box only)The 5th Wheel Hitch Kit (15K) and dealer-installed Ford custom accessories 5th Wheel Hitch Kit by Reese - part #BC3Z-19D520-A is not released to the short box (6.75ft box)NOTE: the short pickup box provides less clearance between the cab and 5th wheel trailer compared to long box pickupsThe receiver centerline of the hitch should be mounted at least 2" forward from the rear-axle of the truck chassisWhen s
  • ALL-WEATHER FLOOR MATS-inc: Deletes carpeted mats
  • CHROME PACKAGE-inc: Chrome Exhaust TipWheels: 18" Chrome Clad Cast Aluminum6" Angular Chrome Step BarsUnique Chrome Mirror Caps
  • ELECTRONIC LOCKING W/3.55 AXLE RATIO
  • ENGINE BLOCK HEATER
  • ENGINE: 6.7L POWER STROKE V8 TURBO DIESEL B20-inc: 4 valve OHVmanual push-button engine-exhaust brakingGVWR: 11 300 lb Payload Package3.31 Axle Ratio26 Gallon Fuel TankDual 78-AH 750 CCA Batteries
  • FX4 OFF-ROAD PACKAGE-inc: unique FX4 Off-Road box decalColored Front & Rear Rancho Branded ShocksHill Descent ControlTransfer Case & Fuel Tank Skid Plates
  • GOOSENECK HITCH KIT-inc: Pre-installed custom accessory
  • HEATED REAR SEATS
  • LARIAT ULTIMATE PACKAGE-inc: Memory PowerScope Trailer Tow MirrorsRemote Start SystemPower Heated/Cooled Passenger SeatTailgate Step & HandleMemory Power Heated/Cooled Driver's Seateasy-entry/exit memory driver's seat featurePower Moonroofmap lights and moonroof switchesNavigation System w/HD & Satellite BroadcastMemory Power Adjustable Pedals
Drive Type: 4WD
Number of Doors: 4 Doors
Mileage: 19

Beechmont Ford has your largest selection of New Trucks, Cars and SUV's in the Greater Cincinnati Tri-State area. 12 Time President's Award Winner for Superior Sales and Customer Service. Must print this listing to receive Special Internet Price. Contact our live chat representative and ask about the current month's rebates and incentives!

Auto Services in Ohio

Zerolift ★★★★★

Automobile Parts & Supplies, Automobile Accessories, Automobile Parts & Supplies-Used & Rebuilt-Wholesale & Manufacturers
Address: 3195 Homeward Way, N-College-Hl
Phone: (513) 874-2508

Worthington Towing & Auto Care Inc ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Towing
Address: Whitehall
Phone: (614) 888-5999

Why Pay More Motors ★★★★★

Used Car Dealers, Wholesale Used Car Dealers
Address: 1200 W 4th St, North-Robinson
Phone: (419) 529-5557

Wayne`s Auto Repair ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Parts & Supplies, Automobile Electric Service
Address: 5995 Westerville Rd, Galena
Phone: (614) 423-6164

Walt`s Auto Inc ★★★★★

Automobile Parts & Supplies, Used & Rebuilt Auto Parts, Automobile Salvage
Address: 3551 Springfield Xenia Rd, Wilberforce
Phone: (800) 325-7564

Voss Collision Centre ★★★★★

Automobile Body Repairing & Painting
Address: 94 Loop Rd, New-Lebanon
Phone: (937) 254-8589

Auto blog

Ford F-150, Chevy Silverado, Toyota Tundra flunk IIHS headlight test

Tue, Oct 25 2016

The Insurance Institute for Highway Safety put pickup truck headlights to the test and found that the majority of them were equipped with subpar units. The 2017 Honda Ridgeline was the only truck to earn a rating of "good." The large pickup truck test was comprised of the: 2016 to 2017 GMC Sierra, 2017 Nissan Titan, 2016 Ram 1500, 2016 to 2017 Chevrolet Silverado, 2016 to 2017 Ford F-150, and 2016 to 2017 Toyota Tundra. The Sierra's headlights earned a rating of "acceptable," the headlights found on the Titan and Ram 1500 were found to be "marginal," and the ones on the Silverado, F-150, and Tundra were rated as "poor." IIHS claims the F-150 was the most disappointing out of the large pickup trucks as both its halogen and optional LED headlights failed to provide adequate visibility during testing. The Ridgeline (which earned a "good rating"), is usually considered a midsize or small truck, though IIHS included it in the field of large pickups. The headlights on the 2016 Chevrolet Colorado, 2016 GMC Canyon, 2016 Nissan Frontier, and 2016 to 2017 Toyota Tacoma, which made up the small pickup truck group, all earned a rating of "poor." The IIHS claimed the Colorado had the worst headlights of any truck that was tested, as the base vehicle's units were only able to illuminate up to 123 feet in front of the car. The Ridgeline's headlights, for reference, were able to illuminate up to 358 feet in front of the vehicle. To conduct its test, the IIHS utilizes a special tool to measure how far light is projected out of the headlights in different driving situations. The trucks' headlights were tested in a straight line and in corners, while vehicles with high-beam assist were given extra praise. The headlights on the pickup trucks also mimic the testing that was done on small SUVs and cars earlier this year. Next year, automakers will need to fit their vehicles with headlights that earn a rating of either good or acceptable to earn the IIHS Top Safety Pick+. Related Video:

All eyes on Detroit as automakers prepare for slow, careful reopening of plants

Thu, May 14 2020

DETROIT — The U.S. factories that make Fords, Chevys and Jeeps are coming back to life this week as workers install new safety equipment and wake up machines ahead of the high-stakes restart the Detroit automakers plan to launch on Monday. Ford, General Motors and Fiat Chrysler Automobiles all plan to reopen North American factories on May 18. The reopening of the U.S. auto sector will be a closely watched test of whether workers across a range of industries can return to factories in large numbers without a resurgence of COVID-19 infections. How well the automakers do will be significant for the U.S. economy, as nearly 1 million workers are employed in the sector. Executives at Ford and GM said separately this week the companies have not recorded any cases of COVID-19 transmission in plants outside the United States since adopting new safety protocols. Those procedures include mandatory face masks, separation of workers on assembly lines, frequent cleaning of work areas and requirements that workers pass through temperature monitors and report any symptoms before entering a plant. The Detroit Three have taken unprecedented steps to share information about coronavirus safety practices and develop a common set of workplace standards for their restarts, working with the United Auto Workers union, executives said. "We thought it was critical that we did it together," Ford manufacturing and labor chief Gary Johnson told Reuters. "We've never done this as an industry." The Detroit automakers will restart U.S. plants without regular testing of workers, because they do not have access to sufficient testing capacity, executives and UAW officials said. They will test workers who report COVID-19 symptoms or have fevers discovered by temperature scanners installed at factory entrances. "We have to continue to push for this testing," United Auto Workers union Vice President Cindy Estrada told Reuters on Wednesday. "Unless we have testing weekly to keep sick people out of the plant there is always a risk." Adopting new safety practices is just part of the work the companies must do to reopen after an extraordinary shutdown that has lasted two months.   Wave zero At Ford, workers going in to ready factories are part of what Chief Operating Officer Jim Farley calls "wave zero." The work of wave zero employees "is really important for success of the startup," he said in an interview.

The 1965 Ford Mustang could have looked a lot different

Fri, May 8 2020

The 1965 Ford Mustang is unquestionably an automotive design icon, and nearly every generation of Mustang has some connection to that original car. Because it's such a universally-known vehicle, we were amazed to see all the different designs that were being considered. Head of Ford's archives Ted Ryan recently shared photos of design proposals for the original Mustang on Twitter that he and Jamie Myler found, and we reached out to them to find out more. As Ryan initially noted, the photos were taken on August 19, 1962, and they are proposals for the Ford Mustang. Apparently Ford had committed to doing a Falcon-based youth-oriented car at this point, and it did have plans to launch the car in 1964 for the 1965 model year. But after having little success with early design proposals, the company asked all of its design studios — the Advanced Studio, Lincoln-Mercury Studio and Ford Studio — to submit proposals. With only about two years before the planned launch, Ford was understandably short on time, and it's believed that the studios only had a month to create and present these designs. Lincoln-Mercury design proposal View 8 Photos The majority of the designs, a total of five, came from the Advanced Studio, and part of this was because they already had a couple of concept designs in reserve it could present. Two other models representing three design possibilities came from Lincoln-Mercury, and just one model with two options came from Ford. The Advanced Studio proposals are shown in the gallery at the very top of this article, and the Lincoln-Mercury and Ford proposals are in the gallery directly above this paragraph. The Advanced Studio's most radical design is the one that was clearly related to the Mustang I concept that would be shown later that year with huge wraparound rear glass, turbine-inspired bumpers and enormous side scoops. The other proposals from the studio were more conservative, featuring simple lines, grilles reminiscent of the Falcon, and one even borrowing the jet-thruster-style taillights made famous on the Thunderbird. Lincoln-Mercury had some impressively bold designs, particularly its fastback that had buttresses to extend the shape all the way to the tail. This car had two different side trim possibilities. The other Lincoln-Mercury design was toned down a bit, but had two interesting possibilities for side detailing, as well as some crisp, low-profile tail fins.