Find or Sell Used Cars, Trucks, and SUVs in USA

2014 Ford F350 Xl on 2040-cars

US $39,790.00
Year:2014 Mileage:98 Color: Oxford White /
 Steel
Location:

602 W Rose Ave, Crane, Missouri, United States

602 W Rose Ave, Crane, Missouri, United States
2014 Ford F350 XL, US $39,790.00, image 1
Advertising:
Fuel Type:Gasoline
Engine:6.2L V8 16V MPFI SOHC
Transmission:6-Speed Automatic
Condition: New
VIN (Vehicle Identification Number): 1FD8X3H63EEA98908
Stock Num: 14646
Make: Ford
Model: F350 XL
Year: 2014
Exterior Color: Oxford White
Interior Color: Steel
Options:
  • 1st and 2nd row curtain head airbags
  • 4 Door
  • 4-wheel ABS Brakes
  • Auxilliary transmission cooler
  • Cancellable Passenger Airbag
  • Clock: In-radio display
  • Coil front spring
  • Cupholders: Front
  • Curb weight: 6,874 lbs.
  • Diameter of tires: 17.0"
  • Door reinforcement: Side-impact door beam
  • Driveline Traction Control
  • Dual Rear Wheels
  • External temperature display
  • Fixed antenna
  • Fold-up cushion rear seats
  • Front and rear suspension stabilizer bars
  • Front Head Room: 40.7"
  • Front Hip Room: 67.6"
  • Front Leg Room: 41.1"
  • Front reading lights
  • Front Shoulder Room: 68.0"
  • Front Ventilated disc brakes
  • Fuel Capacity: 40.0 gal.
  • Fuel Type: Regular unleaded
  • Gross vehicle weight: 14,000 lbs.
  • Instrumentation: Low fuel level
  • Leaf rear spring
  • Leaf rear suspension
  • Left rear passenger door type: Reverse opening
  • Non-independent front suspension classification
  • Other front suspension
  • Overall height: 80.1"
  • Overall Length: 247.5"
  • Overall Width: 92.2"
  • Overhead console: Full with storage
  • Power steering
  • Rear Head Room: 38.1"
  • Rear Hip Room: 67.3"
  • Rear Leg Room: 31.6"
  • Rear Shoulder Room: 68.1"
  • Rear Stabilizer Bar: Regular
  • Regular front stabilizer bar
  • Right rear passenger door type: Reverse opening
  • Rigid axle rear suspension
  • Side airbag
  • Split rear bench
  • Suspension class: Firm
  • Tachometer
  • Tilt and telescopic steering wheel
  • Tires: Load Rating: E
  • Tires: Prefix: LT
  • Tires: Profile: 75
  • Tires: Speed Rating: S
  • Tires: Width: 245 mm
  • Type of tires: AS
  • Urethane shift knob trim
  • Variable intermittent front wipers
  • Vehicle Emissions: Federal
  • Wheel Diameter: 17
  • Wheel Width: 6.5
  • Wheelbase: 162.0"
Drive Type: 4WD
Number of Doors: 4 Doors
Mileage: 98

Auto Services in Missouri

Total Tinting & Total Customs ★★★★★

Automobile Parts & Supplies, Truck Accessories, Window Tinting
Address: 796 Hoff Rd, Saint-Paul
Phone: (636) 474-8468

The Auto Body Shop Inc. ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Body Repairing & Painting, Insurance
Address: 6665 Center Grove Rd, West-Alton
Phone: (618) 656-6545

Tanners Paint And Body ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Body Repairing & Painting, Dent Removal
Address: 2070 E Pythian St, Verona
Phone: (417) 865-4385

Tac Transmissions & Custom Exhaust ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Auto Transmission, Mufflers & Exhaust Systems
Address: 320 S Bernhardt Ave, Gerald
Phone: (573) 764-5540

Square Deal Transmission ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Automobile Parts & Supplies, Auto Transmission
Address: 9725 Manchester Rd, Saint-Ann
Phone: (314) 968-7500

Sports Car Centre Inc ★★★★★

Auto Repair & Service, Brake Repair, Emissions Inspection Stations
Address: 1866 Larkin Williams Rd, Valley-Park
Phone: (636) 343-8363

Auto blog

2016: The year of the autonomous-car promise

Mon, Jan 2 2017

About half of the news we covered this year related in some way to The Great Autonomous Future, or at least it seemed that way. If you listen to automakers, by 2020 everyone will be driving (riding?) around in self-driving cars. But what will they look like, how will we make the transition from driven to driverless, and how will laws and infrastructure adapt? We got very few answers to those questions, and instead were handed big promises, vague timelines, and a dose of misdirection by automakers. There has been a lot of talk, but we still don't know that much about these proposed vehicles, which are at least three years off. That's half a development cycle in this industry. We generally only start to get an idea of what a company will build about two years before it goes on sale. So instead of concrete information about autonomous cars, 2016 has brought us a lot of promises, many in the form of concept cars. They have popped up from just about every automaker accompanied by the CEO's pledge to deliver a Level 4 autonomous, all-electric model (usually a crossover) in a few years. It's very easy to say that a static design study sitting on a stage will be able to drive itself while projecting a movie on the windshield, but it's another thing entirely to make good on that promise. With a few exceptions, 2016 has been stuck in the promising stage. It's a strange thing, really; automakers are famous for responding with "we don't discuss future product" whenever we ask about models or variants known to be in the pipeline, yet when it comes to self-driving electric wondermobiles, companies have been falling all over themselves to let us know that theirs is coming soon, it'll be oh so great, and, hey, that makes them a mobility company now, not just an automaker. A lot of this is posturing and marketing, showing the public, shareholders, and the rest of the industry that "we're making one, too, we swear!" It has set off a domino effect – once a few companies make the guarantee, the rest feel forced to throw out a grandiose yet vague plan for an unknown future. And indeed there are usually scant details to go along with such announcements – an imprecise mileage estimate here, or a far-off, percentage-based goal there. Instead of useful discussion of future product, we get demonstrations of test mules, announcements of big R&D budgets and new test centers they'll fund, those futuristic concept cars, and, yeah, more promises.

Ford Focus EV's slow sales trigger massive incentives

Fri, 25 Jan 2013

The Detroit News reports Ford is having real trouble moving its new Focus Electric. As a result, the automaker is offering substantial incentives in an attempt to lure in more buyers. How substantial? Try $10,750 off of a three-year lease. What's more, the EV can now be had for $37,995 ($2,000 less than its original base price) on top of an additional $2,000 cash discount to buy the EV outright - or you can opt for 1.9-percent financing if you work through Ford Motor Credit. None of which factors in various potential government incentives. Last year, Ford managed to sell a paltry 685 of the 1,627 Focus EV hatchbacks it built.
Ford isn't alone in trying to woo more buyers to its EV effort. Nissan cut the price of its Leaf by a whopping 18 percent for 2013, now down to $28,800 and built in the USA. The move followed the automaker's substantial incentives in 2012.
If you want a Focus Electric, you can now apparently get your hands on one for as little as $285 per month with $930 due at signing for a 36-month lease with 10,500 miles per year.

Recharge Wrap-up: Ford steals Best Green Brand spot from Toyota, EV buyer survey goes online

Wed, Jun 25 2014

Chevrolet is one of the Top Global Green Brands of 2014, according to brand consultancy firm Interbrand. Chevy ranks number 32 on the list, which cover brands across a wide variety of segments. The report measures brand perception and brand performance, and the gap between the two is small for Chevrolet. "The company is not only actively demonstrating its environmental commitment," says Interbrand CEO Jez Frampton. "It's communicating those efforts in an authentic way that resonates with customers." Chevrolet cites its Spark EV, Volt and Cruze models as reason for its green cred. This is the first time Toyota didn't take the top spot. Being 32nd is good and all, but other automotive brands ranked much higher than the Bowtie. Ford, Toyota, Honda and Nissan took the top four spots in the report, respectively, with BMW, Volkswagen and Mercedes-Benz all besting Chevrolet. The big takeaway here is that Ford topped the list. In the Top Global Green Brand list's four-year history, this is the first time Toyota didn't take the top spot. Ford was second on the list last year, and 15th in 2012. "Ford embodies everything the business of the future must be: efficient, visionary, flexible, adept at problem-solving, cooperative, and focused on creating shared value," Interbrand says on its website. "From unveiling a first-of-its-kind solar-powered vehicle, the C-MAX Solar Energi Concept, to partnering with peers across sectors to do the seemingly impossible - like creating bio-plastic out of tomato fiber with Heinz-Ford is showing us what's possible." It bears mentioning that Ford's most recent MPG adjustments came after the study was conducted. Ford is also making the news for its 1.0-liter EcoBoost engine earning International Engine of the Year for the third straight year. Awarded Best Engine Under 1.0 Liter, the turbocharged three-cylinder motor earned high praise from judges. "This year's competition was the fiercest yet, but the 1.0-liter EcoBoost continues to stand out for all the right reasons – great refinement, surprising flexibility and excellent efficiency," said International Engine of the Year co-chairman Dean Slavnich. "The 1.0-liter EcoBoost engine is one of the finest examples of powertrain engineering." The 123-horsepower engine powers the Fiesta 1.0-liter EcoBoost, and will be available in a version of the Ford Focus in the US later this year. See more about the award in the press release, below.